Prime Holyfield vs Prime Povetkin

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by mr. magoo, May 22, 2024.



  1. Furey

    Furey EST & REG 2009 Full Member

    16,347
    6,225
    Oct 18, 2009
  2. Saintpat

    Saintpat Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,778
    20,970
    Jun 26, 2009
    Never saw the big deal about Povetkin.

    When he held the WBA ‘regular’ title, he defended against:

    42-year-old Cedric Boswell, who I’m pretty sure nobody considered to be a contender

    Marko Huck, a cruiserweight fighting at heavy for the first time (majority decision that was pretty heavily disputed and reffed very heavily in Povetkin’s favor at that)

    40-year-old Hasim ‘Past His Sell-By’ Rahman

    Andrzej “Dionne” Warwick, a never-was if there ever was

    A lot of his opponents were very carefully hand-picked for name value while being past viable. Someone mentioned him beating Duhaupas, who literally flew up on day-of-fight notice and had to borrow shoes. Yeah, fair fight there.

    I just don’t see it.
     
    Last edited: May 25, 2024
  3. InMemoryofJakeLamotta

    InMemoryofJakeLamotta I have defeated the great Seamus Full Member

    12,769
    8,678
    Sep 21, 2017
    Tyson wasn't peak, but was still a formidable heavyweight and certainly was regarded as one of the best heavies of 95-97. Beating a 96 Tyson would be an outstanding win on any resume.
     
  4. Gazelle Punch

    Gazelle Punch Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,374
    7,818
    Aug 15, 2018
    I pick Holy too but Pov has an excellent resume
     
    Greg Price99 likes this.
  5. Man_Machine

    Man_Machine Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,840
    8,115
    Jun 9, 2010
    Povetkin was fairly solid and one of the better HWs during the Klitschko Doldrum Era but he tended to be quite formularized in his approach, without adaptation, and relied heavily on those firm fundamentals and being the fitter man in there.

    It also helped that he was as hard as a coffin nail.


    Holyfield had more variety in his arsenal and had the better engine, IMO. He was equally as tough, so this would go the distance in what I reckon would be a good fight - But it's one that Holyfield takes on a comfortable points decision.
     
  6. William Reader

    William Reader Member Full Member

    280
    240
    May 16, 2024
    True. Povetkin was no more of a world champion than Daniel Dubois. He held the WBA 'regular' belt.
     
  7. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    95,667
    25,582
    Jun 2, 2006
    Holyfield in a tough fight that goes the distance.
     
  8. Gog97675

    Gog97675 Member banned Full Member

    254
    129
    Apr 13, 2024
    Lol the things these people say make me think they don't even watch boxing. I seen somebody say Bob Fitizsimmons could beat Lennox Lewis. A 160 pound boxer could beat Lennox Lewis. I seen one person say since the 6'3 230 pound Buster Douglas beat Mike Tyson then the 5'10 180 pound Marciano could do it. I see people say the 170 pound Gene Tunney could baet Foreman since the 6'2 215 pound Jimmy Young did.

    Evander Holyfield fought and beat better opponents in comparison to Povetkin. Holyfield TKO's a prime Povetkin in the middle rounds.
     
  9. Devon

    Devon Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,911
    2,193
    Dec 31, 2018
    Holyfield roughs him up imo, uses the jab, counters left hook, get inside and get dirty, while Povetkin is a front foot fighter and can fight on the inside, he could only really fight clean and didn’t like it when roughed up, don’t think Holyfield should go punch for punch with him on the inside, but grab him push him off and get punches off instead.