Would you classify Tony Tucker as an underachiever?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by dmt, Aug 7, 2024.

  1. dmt

    dmt Hardest hitting hw ever Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2006
    Messages:
    10,626
    Likes Received:
    15,389
    I would. Apart from his win vs Douglas and a solid effort loss to Tyson, he didn't amount to much. He has decent power, good punch variety ( a rare heavyweight who could throw the left uppercut with accuracy and authority), good footwork and defense and a solid chin.

    He should have been in the mix with Holyfield, Bowe, hell even Ruddock, Bruno, Morrison, Mercer etc.

    In a way he was unlucky to run into a peak Tyson and he knew there was nothing he could have done to beat the best version of Mike. So perhaps he was demoralized that the best he could do vs Tyson was to survive. But i still think he had loads of potential.
     
  2. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2006
    Messages:
    97,517
    Likes Received:
    28,721
    Yes,I think I would.
     
  3. bolo specialist

    bolo specialist Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2024
    Messages:
    3,848
    Likes Received:
    7,678
    I would to some degree, although I don't think he would've ever been a truly great fighter.
     
    Smoochie likes this.
  4. Overhand94

    Overhand94 Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2024
    Messages:
    701
    Likes Received:
    918
    I would too.
    Unfortunately, he lacked the killer instinct and was often prone to fight on first gear. And at the moment he seemed to develop into something good, he disappeared and returned without his former speed and mobility.
     
    bolo specialist likes this.
  5. Dynamicpuncher

    Dynamicpuncher Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2022
    Messages:
    14,809
    Likes Received:
    30,403
    He missed out on too many of the notable 80s contenders to really gauge how good he was.

    We know Tucker had a good chin and some decent skills but that's about it. He was also too cautious and fought too much in one gear.

    I often compare Tucker to Bugner two big durable guys with decent skills who fought on the cautious side who are both best known for going the distance against ATGs.

    As for whether Tucker underachieved probably but I don't see him doing that much better there was simply better fighters around Witherspoon, Bowe, Holyfield, Lewis, Tyson, etc.

    Tucker was 48-1 going into the Lewis fight for example how much better could he of done ? I mean had he stayed off the drugs he probably could've got a few bigger fights. But again we don't really know how good Tucker was because he doesn't have many stand out wins. And had he fought the likes of Witherspoon, Holyfield, he probably would've ended up with more losses.
     
    Last edited: Aug 7, 2024
  6. Journeyman92

    Journeyman92 B R B Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2021
    Messages:
    17,962
    Likes Received:
    19,945
    Not really he achieved a lot IMO not everyone gets to be Joe Louis.
    Tony won a piece of the belt and beat two guys who would hold the lineal title. I’d walk away happy with just his amateur career. With what he achieved it was a worthy way to spend a youth.
     
    KellyB, Rockin1 and bolo specialist like this.
  7. robert ungurean

    robert ungurean Богдан Philadelphia Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2007
    Messages:
    15,962
    Likes Received:
    14,819
  8. Smokin Bert

    Smokin Bert Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2013
    Messages:
    5,026
    Likes Received:
    6,739
    Clearly, he underachieved. Bad management and drug problems can do that to a fighter.
     
    Overhand94 and bolo specialist like this.
  9. kingfisher3

    kingfisher3 Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2011
    Messages:
    6,078
    Likes Received:
    1,618
  10. northpaw

    northpaw Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2010
    Messages:
    17,066
    Likes Received:
    10,555
    everyone isn't an underachiever or overachiever, some guys.......................the majority of guys actually.......................accomplished what they were supposed to. No more, no less

    Tony Tucker is that
     
    kingfisher3 likes this.
  11. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2012
    Messages:
    25,718
    Likes Received:
    16,645
    He performed well against Tyson and Lewis. He should’ve regained a title against Seldon, but Seldon messed his eye up.
     
    Smokin Bert likes this.
  12. Fergy

    Fergy Walking Dead Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2017
    Messages:
    28,767
    Likes Received:
    34,974
    Yep he did well to go the distance with Tyson and Lewis, and he got the win over Buster but that's the highlight s really.
     
  13. Markus.C.65

    Markus.C.65 Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2024
    Messages:
    142
    Likes Received:
    199
    His father wrecked his career stage 1.
    Sold so many shares in him for upfront money without Tony's knowledge..
    Kept him away from big fights because a big payday would reveal his duplicity to his son.
    Eventually it had to happen and Tony received less than 30 thousand dollars from a million dollar payday and he only got that because his father was selling new shares in him the night prior to the bout.
    When Tony found out , he was devastated at what his father had done.
    He took time out before resuming under Don King.
    He was a talented fighter.
    Excellent Boxer who had every box ticked.
    He lasted the distance with peak Tyson with relative ease although it was a landslide verdict for Mike.
    Funny moment at the end when he goes over to Tysons corner and tells him and Rooney " Praise the Lord and don't worry Mike , I'll give you a rematch " !
    Never really worked his way up against rated fighters , he was either beating lower ranked guys or losing to Tyson or Lewis. There wasn't much in between apart from the Douglas win.
    Had lots of cracks at ' title versions ' later , but I don't look much at his career post Lennox ,as he was 34 and on the downgrade .
    It's a shame he didn't have one or 2 other high profile fights in between Tyson and Lewis , as this would've given us a better idea as to to his capabilities.
    If I had to give a straight answer to the O.P I would say yes he did under achieve slightly.
     
    zadfrak, Rockin1 and Overhand94 like this.
  14. Saintpat

    Saintpat Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2009
    Messages:
    23,011
    Likes Received:
    25,863
    Of the 14 other 1980s heavyweight title holders, Tyson is the only one he fought.

    No Dokes. No Thomas. No Tubbs or Witherspoon nor Page, Weaver, etc. Not even shopworn-but-still-useful versions. He avoided basically the entire decade in which he came up.

    You can’t miss ALL those guys on the way up (or post-Tyson) by accident. He had to be deliberately steered away from that bunch for it to happen.
     
  15. catchwtboxing

    catchwtboxing Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2014
    Messages:
    26,661
    Likes Received:
    35,254
    I'd classify him as a cokehead.

    But I guess you could say he minored in underachieving.