Rocky Lockridge vs Azumah Nelson

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Titan1, Jun 30, 2007.


  1. Titan1

    Titan1 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,479
    3,017
    Oct 18, 2004
    Could Rocky conceivably last 15 and upset Azumah?
     
  2. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    55,201
    49,501
    Apr 27, 2005
    I think Rocky would stand a decent chance in this one simply because he is underrated to the max and has a difficult style for anyone. He beat a faded Gomez handily but got robbed blind. I'll go for Azumah by very narrow decision based on his class and guile.
     
    Clinton, Jel and PhillyPhan69 like this.
  3. unitas

    unitas Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,062
    768
    May 12, 2007
    gotta go with azumah......but rocky could very well score an upset. he had the goods.
     
    Clinton likes this.
  4. heerko koois

    heerko koois Obsessed with Boxing

    25,258
    19,812
    Apr 26, 2006
    Nelson was a much better boxer....Lockridge was crude and did have bad balance.........
     
    Seamus likes this.
  5. Cobra33

    Cobra33 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,031
    15,272
    Feb 2, 2006
    Rocky was not a crude boxer.How do you come up with that?
    Nelson would have his hands full as Rocky had some fast hands and a decent chin.I think Laporte was the only one to ever stop Lockridge.
     
  6. ThinBlack

    ThinBlack Boxing Addict banned

    4,768
    27
    Sep 18, 2007
    Rocky by an upset decision in a thrilling fight.It would come down to the final three rounds, and Rocky would do just enough to offset Azumah.
     
  7. Totentanz.

    Totentanz. Gator Wrestler Extraordinaire banned Full Member

    1,878
    2,264
    Jun 11, 2024
    Nelson's got it, but damn... I would kill to see this fight.
     
    Clinton likes this.
  8. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    52,177
    27,636
    Jan 3, 2007
    I gotta go with Nelson. Lockridge might have made it a good fight but Azumah was a true all time great
     
    Clinton and Fireman Fred like this.
  9. Jel

    Jel Obsessive list maker Full Member

    8,042
    13,708
    Oct 20, 2017
    I guess this one could have happened - probably just a question of timing - but it would have been an excellent fight.

    I pick Azumah as he is fundamentally a greater fighter but it would go to the cards and might even be a split decision.
     
    Fireman Fred likes this.
  10. Fireman Fred

    Fireman Fred Active Member Full Member

    810
    1,998
    Mar 8, 2014
    If this fight were at featherweight I´d pick Azumah by ko. Nelson gave Sanchez hell, destroyed Gomez easily and blasted Pat Cowdell in crushing fashion as well as beating teak tough future champ Villasana twice. Nobody could knock out Villasana.

    At feather Lockridge lost a controversial decision to Eusebio Pedroza in their 1st fight, was blasted by Juan Laporte and faded badly against Pedroza in their return. Showed guts to make it to the final bell.

    At Super-feather Nelson wasn´t as good, took controversial decisions vs Mario Martinez and Juan Laporte. Clearly lost in his draw against Fenech but made up for it with one of the his greatest performances in the return.

    Lockridge on the other hand flourished at this weight. Terrific wins over Roger Mayweather, Boza-Edwards and arguably over Gomez. Gave Chavez a good fight and made 3 defences in his second reign.

    Lockridge at Super-feather would give Nelson a much better fight and might have a chance over 12 but would fade over 15 where Azumah would take over to win on points.

    Would be a great fight.
     
    Clinton likes this.
  11. Clinton

    Clinton Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,273
    6,588
    Jan 22, 2009
    Great post, Double F. Cheers!
     
    Fireman Fred likes this.