Usyk or Byrd: who is the greater heavyweight?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Cleaver, Oct 17, 2024.


Who is the greater heavyweight of the two?

This poll will close on Jul 14, 2027 at 10:29 AM.
  1. Byrd

    1 vote(s)
    1.9%
  2. Usyk

    53 vote(s)
    98.1%
  1. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,550
    43,817
    Apr 27, 2005
    These were his words about Joshua in 2018 - Wladimir Lewis and Joshua have all been dominant

    And who could forget - "Joshua might be ahead of Lewis head to head but in overall accomplishments I think Lewis still has an edge although two or three more good wins could put Joshua ahead."
     
    swagdelfadeel likes this.
  2. swagdelfadeel

    swagdelfadeel Obsessed with Boxing

    18,936
    20,261
    Jul 30, 2014
    Actually Chisora just came back and beat the guy who many swore was the real #1 in the division being avoided by Fury, Joshua, and Wilder.
     
  3. Cleaver

    Cleaver Member Full Member

    498
    494
    Sep 24, 2024
    No one swore Joyce was #1 after being Zhang'd twice!
     
    swagdelfadeel likes this.
  4. swagdelfadeel

    swagdelfadeel Obsessed with Boxing

    18,936
    20,261
    Jul 30, 2014
    I was referring to before that.
     
  5. Cleaver

    Cleaver Member Full Member

    498
    494
    Sep 24, 2024
    Yes. But they are all at the end of the road. Dubois is the opposite, he's possibly still improving. I tend to give Usyk more credit for defeating an up-and-coming Dubois than the other wins he has made at heavyweight. It is an impressive win, even if Dubois was still a bit short of what he's possibly become since.
     
    swagdelfadeel likes this.
  6. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,610
    28,866
    Jun 2, 2006
    Pulev was ranked no5
    Povetkin no4
    Parker no3
    Where are Tua's equivalent wins?
     
    MaccaveliMacc and swagdelfadeel like this.
  7. Cleaver

    Cleaver Member Full Member

    498
    494
    Sep 24, 2024
    Pulev and Povetkin were 39 years old. Tua was in a stronger era. Tua beat several opponents who were as good as 39 year old Pulev, of course. That's not even worth arguing about - it is obvious.
     
    cross_trainer likes this.
  8. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,610
    28,866
    Jun 2, 2006
    Tua was in a stronger era but he did not beat the best of that era.
    Unless you think Rahman and Maskaev were as good as Povetkin and Parker?
     
    MaccaveliMacc and swagdelfadeel like this.
  9. Dynamicpuncher

    Dynamicpuncher Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,216
    31,543
    Jan 14, 2022
    People need to look at the context of Byrd's win vs Vitali.

    He had 7 days notice fighting in Vitali's backyard against a much larger opponent. Byrd was able to make Vitali miss a considerable amount of punches whilst landing over 40 percent of his own punches.

    At the time of the stoppage only 8 punches separated Byrd & Vitali with Byrd landing at a much higher percentage. It was a very competitive fight despite the myth of people telling you Vitali was dominating which is nonsense.

    I credit Byrd's defense for Vitali's shoulder injury and taking into account he had 7 days notice and being much smaller it's a good win IMO.
     
    MaccaveliMacc and Overhand94 like this.
  10. Overhand94

    Overhand94 Active Member Full Member

    735
    983
    Jun 23, 2024
    Completely agree. The fight was closer than what the scorecards indicated.
    The thing that surprised me the most is that Byrd seemed to hurt Vitali with his shots.
     
    MaccaveliMacc and Dynamicpuncher like this.
  11. Dynamicpuncher

    Dynamicpuncher Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,216
    31,543
    Jan 14, 2022
    He actually had Vitali backing up after the 5th round and totally neutralised his jab I don't think Byrd gets enough credit for the win.

    How many other fighters on 7 days notice with a 6 inch height disadvantage 5 inch reach disadvantage with a 33 pound weight disadvantage could fight a very competitive fight vs Vitali ?
     
    OddR and Overhand94 like this.
  12. Overhand94

    Overhand94 Active Member Full Member

    735
    983
    Jun 23, 2024
    Yes, that's an underrated win of Byrd.
     
    MaccaveliMacc and Dynamicpuncher like this.
  13. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,503
    27,039
    Feb 15, 2006
    When you compare the number of ranked contenders they thought, there isn't as much in it as you might think.
    When you look at the stage of their careers when he fought them, it is not as impressive as it sounds.
    Hergovic was ranked #5 I think, so that counts for something.

    It is also not too late for him to come back.
    I can't dispute any of this, albeit the Wallin win was respectable.
     
    swagdelfadeel likes this.
  14. The Long Count

    The Long Count Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,362
    8,746
    Oct 8, 2013
    Byrd was smaller than Usyk so he was even more disadvantaged fighting the super heavies. He also fought more total fights, the majority of which in the big boy division. Naturally I would expect him to have some more warts on his career than Usyk. Having said that I believe Usyk beats him head to head, as his legs and stamina are the perfect foil to Byrd's style. As far as top level wins go, I would give slight edge to Usyk and he doesn't have any prime losses or losses at all at this point. So he gets the edge. but Byrd is underrated.
     
    Overhand94 likes this.
  15. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    60,021
    80,019
    Aug 21, 2012
    Usyk. Come on.
     
    swagdelfadeel likes this.