Wilder v Wlad Klitschko

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by KO_King, Jan 11, 2025.


  1. Shootlow

    Shootlow Member Full Member

    434
    499
    Jun 29, 2016
    I'm not confused at all. I was taking a very simplistic view in order for LUFC to see my point that just because Wilder was ranked 3rd or 4th does not mean he beats lower ranked but still good boxers but hes adamant Wilder was top 3 and theres no alternative argument. I thought that would have been obvious the way I put it, maybe you were confused.
     
  2. ruffryders

    ruffryders Active Member Full Member

    1,111
    798
    Oct 7, 2010
    Wilder was top 3, so he’s right.

    whether he beats everyone else ranked below is irrelevant.

    Ah I thought you were confused, you have clarified that your not and your point just has completely no value.

    a ranking system does not mean a fighter theoretically does anything, it goes by achievements.
     
  3. Shootlow

    Shootlow Member Full Member

    434
    499
    Jun 29, 2016
    Surely you should have to do something to achieve a high ranking. He made his dough so he was successful and he was a world champion but his rankings flattered to deceive he beat a lot of very average, mediocre opponents and their rankings clarify that.
     
    BubblesUK likes this.
  4. ruffryders

    ruffryders Active Member Full Member

    1,111
    798
    Oct 7, 2010
    Sorry I’m not sure I understand what you mean here.

    rankings work exactly off achievements, not theoretical fights.
    So to be ranked high, it’s not off theory but off achievement.
    so to achieve a high ranking you generally have to do the right things in the ring.

    Most the heavyweights out there are very average and mediocre, unfortunately we didn’t have a stacked hw division and still don’t. It’s typically a weak division with a lot of cumbersome or fat guys.
    This is why people have criticised the resume of all top guys since the 70’s.

    Which ones are ranked so low and by which body?
    Wilders defences were all against top 15 ranked opponents in the wbc.
     
    Jackomano likes this.
  5. ruffryders

    ruffryders Active Member Full Member

    1,111
    798
    Oct 7, 2010
    Wilder was not some golden boy.
    He came out of the olympics with a bronze medal and unlike most Olympians, he started from the bottom in small hall shows and had to work his way up.
    he did this by fighting very regularly, which is a common way to build a fighter and get them the work they need.
     
  6. Hazaroth

    Hazaroth New Member banned Full Member

    91
    51
    Oct 24, 2023
  7. northpaw

    northpaw Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,940
    10,372
    Jun 5, 2010
    In 2017 Wilder would've melted Wlad in 2-3 rounds (he would've gotten him out way faster than Joshua)

    Any version of Wlad before his initial retirement Wlad would stop Wilder.............7-8 rounds.
     
    MarkusFlorez99 likes this.
  8. BubblesUK

    BubblesUK Doesn't buy hypejobs Full Member

    3,508
    6,043
    May 6, 2021
    Exactly.

    It looks a bit like Fury-Wilder 2 - except with a savage KO to finish.

    Wilder wouldn't have stood a chance and he knew it.
     
    kriszhao, MaccaveliMacc and Oddone like this.
  9. BubblesUK

    BubblesUK Doesn't buy hypejobs Full Member

    3,508
    6,043
    May 6, 2021
    Is it?

    I don't have him ahead of Povetkin for starters.

    Then there's Parker.

    And Whyte is questionable too considering Wilder ducked him HARD.

    It's certainly not beyond question that Wilder was #3... It's not even certain he was top 5.
     
    MaccaveliMacc likes this.
  10. BubblesUK

    BubblesUK Doesn't buy hypejobs Full Member

    3,508
    6,043
    May 6, 2021
    Don't agree mate.

    Unlike Joshua, I don't think Wilder would've got up from that punch - heart isn't in doubt, but I just don't think he had the chin to take the kind of power even old Wlad had.

    On top of that, Joshua barely got through it and proved far, far more in both the following years and his career as a whole... I don't see how Wilder would've won besides a flukey punchers chance, and even then he'd lose more often than not.
     
    kriszhao, northpaw and MaccaveliMacc like this.
  11. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    79,849
    20,418
    Sep 15, 2009
    Can you point to a single moment between the reigns of Wlad and Usyk when Wilder was not top 3?
     
  12. BubblesUK

    BubblesUK Doesn't buy hypejobs Full Member

    3,508
    6,043
    May 6, 2021
    It would be harder, if it's even possible, to point to a moment when he actually was one of the three best fighters.

    Before Fury came back, maybe - Parker wasn't prime yet and if Wilder was ever going to be able to beat him that would've been the time... But there's still AJ, Povetkin and Whyte there and he's either ducked or is still actively ducking all three during that period.

    On paper, with corrupt orgs, he was top 3 - to casuals he was top 3... To serious fans, he was a prospect with a belt, who had managed to avoid fighting anyone good and was difficult if not impossible to rank - I don't buy hype without proof.
     
    Shootlow likes this.
  13. fencik45

    fencik45 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,751
    2,453
    Jun 6, 2022
    all of which are better than any of wilders victories.
     
    kriszhao and BubblesUK like this.
  14. northpaw

    northpaw Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,940
    10,372
    Jun 5, 2010
    Wlad is methodical, he's not gonna run out and ice Wilder. That's not how he fights. Even the prime version let alone 2017 Wlad who was simply not long for the ring. 2017 Wilder, hell no version of Wilder was an elite boxer IMO but he was quick on the trigger, and yeah Wilder is nothing but a free swinger, every high level knockout he has I'd say was a flukey shot. But he does eventually connects on everyone, he would've connected on Wlad. 2017 Wlad was not championship Wlad. I'm not one of the guys who thought he looked great against Joshua. Prime Wlad would've mugged and dispatched Joshua. I just think Wilder would've clipped Wlad before Wlad dragged him to hell.

    Again prime vs prime my answer is Wlad all day. Not the Wlad who fought Joshua though
     
  15. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    79,849
    20,418
    Sep 15, 2009
    Show me any independent rankings that had him outside of the top 3 then please.