Furys 3rd win over Chisora is underrated

Lineal champions repeatedly beating Chisora is becoming its own separate sport at this point.

 

Especially since he could have taken him out whenever he wanted

 

This comment is on target like a B-29 over Hiroshima,, it destroys the topic .. Nice job..

 

I refuse to believe you're actually being serious this is eirher you just wanting to argue or you're just trolling or for some reason the context is completely flying over your head and you somehow can't comprehend it.

Why should a Heavyweight champion of the world get alot of credit for beating the same fringe contender 3 times who he's already beaten twice before convincingly ? How does that even make sense ? And why is Fury even defending the title against an unranked opponent who he's already beaten twice ?

So not only are you actually defending it you want us to give Fury alot of credit for it ? Have you gone absolutely bonkers ?

I wouldn't say Usyk "heavily struggled against Chisora" it wasn't his best night but he still won a pretty wide UD.

Neither of the opponents you have mentioned have ever fought an opponent with a 40 pound weight advantage. If they fought a fighter 3 or 4 weightclasses bigger than them pressuring them all night long I'm sure they wouldn't have an easy night either.

Again you somehow are not understanding the context and I really don't understand how you can't understand it ?

Usyk was moving up in weight testing the waters in the division with his first real notable opponent at the weight. No one gives Usyk alot of credit for beating Chisora and no one makes out it was his best night so I don't know what you're talking about. It's a solid win nothing more nothing less because of the weight disadvantage and because Usyk at that time was an unknown quantity in the division facing his first notable opponent.

Again how does that compare to a Heavyweight champion of the world who's supposed to be the best in the division defending the title against an unranked opponent and fighting him for the 3rd time ? When Chisora didn't deserve his shot, no one asked for the fight, Chisora was 1-3 in his last 4 fights.

So again I ask how is that comparable and why should Fury get alot of credit for it ?

 

So Fury should get alot of credit for defending his title against an unranked fringe contender who was 1-3 in his last 4 fights who'd he'd already beaten twice before.

But Usyk should be discredited for moving up in weight as a contender at that time and be discredited for winning a wide UD over his first real notable Heavyweight.

Yeah I'm done with this conversation you're a numpty baffling how you can't understand the difference in context.

 

Chisora isn't a good win for "anyone" hes a good win for "everyone".

 

Still laughing my ass of at anyone who thinks Fury beating Chisora for the 3rd time was something special.

 

The bigger problem with Usyk v Chisora it is was the start of a tradition of Usyk losing a bunch of rounds at HW and people pretending he was dominant. It was Usyks HW debut and Chisoras fought many top fighters close. As long as Chisora doesn't actually win(wtf Wallin) its not a problem.

 

Doesn't matter when Usyk beat Fury twice and would do so again if tubbo puts down the booze and pipe.