Best super heavyweight that Archie Moore could beat

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by InMemoryofJakeLamotta, May 8, 2025.

  1. MaccaveliMacc

    MaccaveliMacc Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2024
    Messages:
    4,065
    Likes Received:
    6,147
    Were these titles at all recognized by the public? That's the first time I heard about them.
     
  2. George Crowcroft

    George Crowcroft He Who Saw The Deep Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2019
    Messages:
    27,118
    Likes Received:
    44,819
    No, at least not widely. Marciano was the heavyweight champ.
     
  3. HistoryZero26

    HistoryZero26 Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2024
    Messages:
    4,248
    Likes Received:
    3,721
    The NSAC title is commonly referenced on here compared to other old alphabet belts. I'm surprised you haven't heard of that one.

    Its hard to say the timeline for both of them was very short. Moore lost to Marciano after winning the NSAC belt and would have been recognized otherwise because Marciano wasn't going to fight again after Cockell. But Moore campaigned to fight Marciano and when he lost any recognition he would have gotten went away. Moores NSAC title is more of an aborted real belt than a real or fake one.

    The Canadian belt was less recognized and got more turned into a bye for Moore in the IBCs process to name a successor for Marciano. Moore did not have to win another fight to fight Patterson. It seems to have been generally accepted that beating Parker was not enough to make Moore champ but at the time he was the only HW title claimant and had some advantage of incumbency over the 14 months following his Marciano loss.

    The point was that despite it being a very small era Moore arguably beat the two biggest top HWs for his belts. Holman who Moore didn't beat was 6 ft 3 like Valdes but was a little lighter. Cestac was 6 ft 4 and Moore beat him twice. When you throw the Baker win in there Moores got a fairly proven track record against larger opponents even if you don't consider any of these guys superheavyweights(they were Bridgerweights).
     
  4. THE BLADE 2

    THE BLADE 2 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2009
    Messages:
    11,652
    Likes Received:
    4,374
    Antonhy Joshua
     
    Kid Bacon likes this.
  5. PRW94

    PRW94 Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2020
    Messages:
    2,131
    Likes Received:
    3,717
    I said it would be a tough assignment for Moore, what do you want me to do, say Cooney would pulverize him in a round? He wouldn't because Archie Moore was smarter than Norton and Lyle put together and would make it tough for Cooney unlike Norton and Lyle. And if he weathers those historic-level body shots and gets Cooney deep into the fight he's got a chance because Archie could go deep and I'm not confident Cooney could.
     
  6. InMemoryofJakeLamotta

    InMemoryofJakeLamotta I have defeated the great Seamus Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2017
    Messages:
    15,855
    Likes Received:
    11,416
    I'm not sure Moore beats AJ, even though Moore is the greater fighter
     
    MaccaveliMacc likes this.
  7. Jason Thomas

    Jason Thomas Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2019
    Messages:
    4,377
    Likes Received:
    5,140
    They were been bigger and stronger,

    but younger?

    Lyle was 39. Norton just about 38 (and there were always a belief that he was a couple of years older than his listed age)

    The best evidence (the 1920 census) is that Moore was born in December, 1916. If this fight came off in 1955, he would be about the same age as Norton and Lyle when they faced Cooney.

    *to me, Cooney's real quality remains a question mark. So I think Moore would have a good chance.
     
  8. MaccaveliMacc

    MaccaveliMacc Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2024
    Messages:
    4,065
    Likes Received:
    6,147
    So you could say that Moore was the first light heavyweight to win a world title at heavyweight since Fitz?
     
    HistoryZero26 likes this.
  9. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2005
    Messages:
    52,544
    Likes Received:
    43,794
    I wouldn't label "prime" Cooney's stamina "very poor". While we don't have a lot to go on he got into the 13th round against still prime Larry Holmes and i don't think anyone with very poor stamina is doing that unless they have granite in there jaw for starters.

    Some fights against some actual contenders would have shown us more in various departments but he was still competing quite deep into the fight.
     
    swagdelfadeel and MaccaveliMacc like this.
  10. HistoryZero26

    HistoryZero26 Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2024
    Messages:
    4,248
    Likes Received:
    3,721
    Moore was the last to do it until Spinks. In between Fitz and Moore plenty of fighters won versions of the LHW and HW title mostly before 1930.
     
  11. Unique Way

    Unique Way Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2023
    Messages:
    1,001
    Likes Received:
    1,898
    Serious question: why wouldn't you consider Cooney a super heavyweight? I saw Cooney and Lennox next to each other in person few years ago at the WBC convention, and Cooney is at least 1 and half inches taller than Lennox who is unanimously considered a super heavyweight.
     
    InMemoryofJakeLamotta likes this.
  12. InMemoryofJakeLamotta

    InMemoryofJakeLamotta I have defeated the great Seamus Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2017
    Messages:
    15,855
    Likes Received:
    11,416
    But does super heavyweight have to do more with weight or height? One could be 6'4 and not even a heavyweight, let alone a super heavyweight. Then you can have someone like David Tua, who's under 6 feet, but be a solid 225 pounds
     
  13. Devon

    Devon Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2018
    Messages:
    6,294
    Likes Received:
    5,425
    Because there were fights where he weighed in the 220s, he did against Norton.
     
  14. RockyValdez

    RockyValdez Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2013
    Messages:
    579
    Likes Received:
    303
    I think Moore could beat a lot of the big guys.
     
  15. RockyValdez

    RockyValdez Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2013
    Messages:
    579
    Likes Received:
    303
    Valdes and Baker werent bad fighters at all and Moore beat both convincingly. I think hed be competetive with todays bigger guys. Typically it was the movers that gave him problems. I think hed have more trouble with a Fury or an Usyk though.
     
    InMemoryofJakeLamotta likes this.