Will the athletes 60 years from now make the modern boxers look like club fighters

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by MarkusFlorez99, May 31, 2025.


  1. MarkusFlorez99

    MarkusFlorez99 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,869
    14,886
    Jan 13, 2021
    It's no secret that the talent pool and the skill level in boxing has only increased since the 1960s. The body mechanics and training methods improved. The exposure to more diverse styles via globalization has rounded our modern boxers well in comparison to the archaic fighters of yesteryear. The number of fast twitch muscle possessors increased. Film Studying increased. Knowledge on premium nutrition and health has gotten better. If we put any random world champion from today's era in the 1960s they would dominate with moderate difficulty. Janibek for example would demolish Monzon, Robinson and Hagler. Too big and too skilled.

    And there's no reason this evolutionary trend will stop, evolution does not stop. Every elite boxer in the future will make unusually talented fighters like Lomachenko, Roy Jones, Usyk and Mayweather look ordinary, and make typical run of the mill champions like Tank or Benavidez look like Club fighters
     
  2. Rollin

    Rollin Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,959
    6,276
    Nov 17, 2021
    How is Hagler—a switch-hitting god with inside game, fantastic boxing abilities, titanium chin, cracking punch, and excellent conditioning—mentioned as archaic? The likes of Archie Moore, Ezzard Charles, Willie Pep, Ray Robinson, Joe Louis, or Jose Napoles are not being made look archaic by anyone, ever, up until we move into science fiction territory of genetically enhanced humans.
     
    Badbot, MrPook, Jackomano and 6 others like this.
  3. OddR

    OddR Active Member Full Member

    1,319
    1,306
    Jan 8, 2025
  4. Glassbrain

    Glassbrain Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,617
    1,420
    Apr 9, 2016
    I think it's already peaked, from the 70's to the 90's athletes were at the peak. Sure there are some anomolies, but how many fighters could go 15 fast paced rounds, today? I don't look back at the 70's and 80's and think those were lesser athletes than fighters today. Even further back, I don't believe their to be a more well rounded fighter than Ray Robinson, which was over 70 years ago.
     
    Overhand94, Loudon and Reinhardt like this.
  5. HistoryZero26

    HistoryZero26 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,514
    3,041
    Jan 6, 2024
    No. This difference only matters at the start when no one knows what they are doing and everyone is establishing techniques through trial and error.

    Evolution does not stop like in nature but it took millions and millions of years. People expecting each generation to be a different species have a distorted view of the concept.
     
  6. dmt

    dmt Hardest hitting hw ever Full Member

    10,280
    14,652
    Jul 2, 2006
    Maybe boxers 20,000 years from now will be superior.

    But evolution is a slow process. The idea that evolution is endless and extremely fast is of course preposterous.
     
  7. MarkusFlorez99

    MarkusFlorez99 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,869
    14,886
    Jan 13, 2021
    But don't sports evolve quickly ? Football players from the 70s and 80s simply can't keep up with the size and performance increase of modern athletes. Rugby players even 20 years ago are too far behind. Baseball players have been pitching faster and faster since the 80s. The game has changed, these new boxers are hitting harder than ever before, they're too skilled, too agile, too strong and disciplined for those old fighters how could they possibly compete ?

    Joe Louis wouldn't be able to compete in the 1970s, let alone today, and the same is true for all eras the sport just gets better as more knowledge is passed down. I fear what these PED monsters will look like in 50 years time
     
  8. dmt

    dmt Hardest hitting hw ever Full Member

    10,280
    14,652
    Jul 2, 2006
    baseball players have been on steriods since the 90's.

    I am not sure about the hitting harder than ever before part. How? Which heavyweight today is such an enormous puncher that we haven't seen something like it before?

    Holyfield said that Foreman, a 1970's fighter, hit him harder than anyone even though Foreman was a generation apart.

    Which heavyweight today throws a harder left hook than David Tua or Mike Tyson?

    Which heavyweight today has a better right hand than Lennox Lewis, a man who retired 22 years ago?

    I honestly do not see any evidence of guys hitting harder.
     
  9. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,181
    46,385
    Mar 21, 2007
    It's good that you use the word "evolution". This is the right word.

    Evolution doesn't drive excellence though, it drives adaptation. A good example is parrying. Parrying, in 1900, where fighters used 4 ounce horsehair gloves or even skin-gloves, is a completely different skill to parrying with modern gloves, which are treble the size. And the parrying skills of the 1900 fighter will be the more developed skills. He will be "more skilled" in accordance with the way people here use the term. But those skills are over-trained versus what is necessary now.

    So, in this example, if boxing in the future uses skin gloves, MMA gloves, or something similar, parrying skills will become far more developed compared to now boxers. If the gloves get bigger, parrying will become less developed again.

    If rounds become shorter, say 90 seconds long, then now boxers will look awful compared to future boxers because future boxers will risk way more lengthy attacks over their 90 second rounds and fluid combination punching and defensive skills will be even more at a premium. On the other hand, if boxing stays at twelve rounds but goes to five minute rounds, future boxers will pace themselves, and future boxing fans will wonder at the footage of Roman Gonzalez.

    In all these cases though, boxers are "evolving".
     
    Overhand94, Loudon and SquareUp like this.
  10. Barrf

    Barrf Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,643
    7,047
    Sep 19, 2021
    You've made too many of these. I think we're getting what you're doing now. Lol
     
  11. Reinhardt

    Reinhardt Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,574
    18,262
    Oct 4, 2016
    Here's a better question: Why do boxers from 50 years ago make todays fighters look like club fighters
     
  12. bandeedo

    bandeedo Loyal Member Full Member

    35,817
    23,694
    Feb 19, 2007
    Since the average testosterone levels in men has dropped by about half since the 70s, will the male athletes 60 years from now be getting periods?
     
    Loudon, Arch Stanton and Reinhardt like this.
  13. Joceho

    Joceho New Member Full Member

    60
    22
    Oct 24, 2009
    “Janibek for example would demolish Monzon, Robinson and Haglar”. “Too big and too skilled”. Seriously??? That’s such an egregiously imbecilic statement to make. Are you trolling, inebriated, or simply, just not very bright? Using your logic against you and after nearly 13k posts, one would think you would evolve to the point where you are capable of articulating an intelligent concept and posting it. Yet it has not occurred. No disrespect to Janibek. He is a solid champion and exciting fighter to watch, but he has done nothing to imply he be mentioned in the class of those 3.
     
    Loudon, Mickea4, SquareUp and 2 others like this.
  14. Reinhardt

    Reinhardt Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,574
    18,262
    Oct 4, 2016

    Ouch! boy that truth really stings!
     
    Jackomano and bandeedo like this.
  15. VOXDEI

    VOXDEI Active Member Full Member

    635
    722
    May 17, 2021
    I am a "boxing evolutionist" broadly speaking.

    But boxing improvement is, in my view, a curve approaching but never meeting 1.

    The difference between guys fighting in the 30's and 60's is bigger than the difference between the 60's and 90's is bigger than the 90's and 2020's. The space for improvement is constanty diminishing and the margins are getting finer and finer.

    Take height as an example; of course there are advantages to being tall, but people arent genetically disposed to getting infinitely taller on a linear scale, there's only so tall a man can get.

    The same applies, in my view, to other aspects of the game and while it isn't so straightforward as to suggest that all attributes are getting better all the time, I do think that the overall standard has got higher but there's only so high it can get.

    There must be genetic, pharmaceutical, and talent limits to the human condition.

    So, yes, they will probably be better than today on the whole but that doesn't necessarily mean that anyone from that era is clearing the 2020 division undefeated. But maybe the number 10 or 15 in 60 years would be number 1 today.

    Who knows, none of this is linear, maybe the champ in 2040 will be better than 2060, will be better than 2020, idk.
     
    MarkusFlorez99 and Loudon like this.