Would the Soviet sports machine have taken over boxing had they allowed their Boxers to turn pro?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by MixedMartialLaw, Jun 10, 2025 at 4:59 PM.


  1. MixedMartialLaw

    MixedMartialLaw Fight sports enthusiast Full Member

    1,516
    2,377
    Jun 30, 2021
    If, during the 1950s through 80s, the period when the Soviets were smashing world records and racking up Olympic medals left and right, they had been allowed to compete professionally in boxing, would they have posed serious competition to the American boxers who dominated that era?

    Just look at how successful the Soviet boxing style remains even today. Could we have seen a Drago vs. Ali–type showdown for the world championship?
     
  2. Saintpat

    Saintpat Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,830
    25,420
    Jun 26, 2009
    There’s a big difference between success and taking over.

    No, they would not have taken over. And probably drug testing would have needed to become more prevalent to keep the Povetkins at the gate. (USSR/Russia have had a systematic drug cheating system in place for decades.)

    I don’t think they’ve taken over now. So why or how would they have done so if they allowed pros earlier? No doubt some of them would have won titles, but they wouldn't have run roughshod over the whole world scene.
     
  3. Journeyman92

    Journeyman92 Out For Milk Full Member

    17,077
    19,037
    Sep 22, 2021
    lol NOPE they only know how to train guys who fight like amateurs. America has years and years of pro training expertise, today’s fighters being borderline paid amateurs has made things complicated. If the soviets brought Miller, Whitey, Clancy and Goldman those real trainers over and paid them USSR government big bucks to teach boxing to others full time and train trainers well no duh any country could make that happen or even if it was just full time government funded guys teaching round the clock for decades creating pro fighters of course they’d “take over” it’d be a state funded enterprise… in the real world though? They made amateur fighters who wouldn’t survive in the “old days” imagine Bivol or Artur vs Spinks, Moore, Charles or Qawi… Tszyu vs Robinson? Duran Or Armstrong?
     
  4. MixedMartialLaw

    MixedMartialLaw Fight sports enthusiast Full Member

    1,516
    2,377
    Jun 30, 2021
    Yes, they literally started it. Modern PED usage within sports is generally dated to the Soviets Olympics debut in the 1950s. Don't think testing would have necessarily started earlier in Boxing, boxers were allowed to juice their eyeballs out with minimal to no testing, until the late 90s really.

    The Soviet Union obviously doesn't exist anymore. Russia despite still producing great boxers doesn't have the same sports infrastructure or devotion the USSR did. They to a large extent tied the success of communism to how well their athletes did on the worlds athletic stages.

    Even then, look how the Klitschko's took over HW boxing the 2000s, Usyk, Bivol, Bertibiev now. There had to be some killers back in the 60s who could just never compete pro.
     
    robert ungurean likes this.
  5. cross_trainer

    cross_trainer Liston was good, but no "Tire Iron" Jones Full Member

    17,817
    13,409
    Jun 30, 2005
    Didn't our amateurs compete on equal or better footing to theirs back then? If so, I don't think they'd dominate the pro game, either.
     
  6. MixedMartialLaw

    MixedMartialLaw Fight sports enthusiast Full Member

    1,516
    2,377
    Jun 30, 2021
    Frasier and Foreman did beat their Soviet Bloc opponents at the Olympics to win gold.

    But of course the Olympic format is different than how things would work in the pro.
     
    cross_trainer likes this.
  7. cross_trainer

    cross_trainer Liston was good, but no "Tire Iron" Jones Full Member

    17,817
    13,409
    Jun 30, 2005
    I guess my point is, if their machine couldn't produce guys to consistently beat our amateurs back then -- even though that's what it was designed to do -- then why should we believe that their machine could produce guys to beat our pros?
     
  8. themaster458

    themaster458 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,980
    2,304
    May 17, 2022
    They def would have brought in great fighters who if given the right experience would have done very well in the pros especially in the heavier divisons. Just look at what great amateur's like the Klitschko, Usyk, Golovkin, Lomachenko have been able to achieve so far and there were just as many great fighters back then who never got a chance to shine.
     
  9. MixedMartialLaw

    MixedMartialLaw Fight sports enthusiast Full Member

    1,516
    2,377
    Jun 30, 2021
    Perhaps 'taken over' wasn’t the right term, but serious foreign competition to American boxers, especially at heavyweight as you mentioned, unlike our time? Yes, certainly.

    Also, as has been mentioned, the Soviets were at the cutting edge of state-sponsored PEDs at the time for their athletes, with a decades-long advantage over other nations, including the U.S. It was American bodybuilders who later adopted anabolic steroids in the US, and it took some time for the practice to spread from bodybuilding to professional sports.
     
    themaster458 likes this.
  10. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    59,937
    43,408
    Feb 11, 2005
    I seriously doubt that USSR was the only faction doping. PED's were firmly entrenched in gym culture by the 1960's. I'm afraid that if we knew what could be known about US fighters from the Golden Era we would be gravely disappointed.
     
    offshoot, Pat M and Journeyman92 like this.
  11. robert ungurean

    robert ungurean Богдан Philadelphia Full Member

    15,893
    14,699
    Jun 9, 2007
    Im gonna say no. Most Eastern Euros are incomplete fighters.
     
    Journeyman92 likes this.
  12. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    58,781
    78,226
    Aug 21, 2012
    More or less this. They may not have "dominated" but they would have done well.
     
    Salty Dog, themaster458 and Pat M like this.
  13. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,201
    28,144
    Jun 2, 2006
    They have always be pro's as far as I'm concerned.
     
    Bokaj and Saad54 like this.
  14. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,201
    28,144
    Jun 2, 2006
    None of the underlined are Russian.
     
    Salty Dog and robert ungurean like this.
  15. Journeyman92

    Journeyman92 Out For Milk Full Member

    17,077
    19,037
    Sep 22, 2021
    Bivol, Usyk, Loma and Kostya off the top of my head are all respectfully 1 dimensional and amateurish in there style compare them to Olivares, JCC, Marquez, Floyd, Starling, Curry... it's black and white.
     
    robert ungurean likes this.