James Toney vs Sugar Ray Leonard

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by James9753, Sep 20, 2018.


  1. ETM

    ETM I thought I did enough to win. Full Member

    13,174
    11,474
    Mar 19, 2012
    A world where Ray Leonard beat Marvin Hagler while James Toney got whipped by Dave Tiberi and went life and death with Reggie Johnson.

    It's called reality.
     
    Seamus and hdog like this.
  2. SHADAPBLAD

    SHADAPBLAD Viscous Knockouts Full Member

    1,143
    1,279
    Feb 15, 2017
    Indeed they would
     
  3. redrooster

    redrooster Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,635
    331
    Jan 29, 2005

    in a world where he had to wait 5 years for a champion to run dry, then shoot for a disputed decision over a shell and failed to make one title defense and ran scared of any LIVE competition at 160

    I sure didnt see Ray Leonard take on Nunn when he had the chance

    James Toney did the trick. Leonard didnt

    neither did I see leonard in with the likes of Johnson

    who should I give credit to; the guy who DID or the guy who didnt?
     
  4. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    40,767
    10,142
    Mar 7, 2012
    You really do hate Ray.
     
  5. dawnofthedead

    dawnofthedead Member Full Member

    350
    133
    Nov 13, 2014
    Leonard was a fantastic fighter whereas Toney was very good but could be inconsistent, i would pick Leonard.
     
  6. Philosopher

    Philosopher Active Member Full Member

    1,329
    2,048
    Aug 10, 2024
    Leonard picked a pocket that night, smoke, mirrors and a rabbit outa hat. He didn't beat Hagler, and not beating that version of Hagler speaks volumes about what would have happened with peak, prime, focused Hagler. And yet, he got the 'w', but sometimes history doesn't give is the full picture...
     
  7. Flash24

    Flash24 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,372
    9,255
    Oct 22, 2015
    A lot of posters have that opnion.
    Personally I don't agree.
    I believe Leonard would beat Hagler prime vs prime.
    And my opnion was believed by No less of an authority than the legendary Roberto Duran who told Leonard he'd beat Hagler right after he fought him.
    Hagler could be taken out of his game and out foxed.
    Even in his prime, he could be confused by certain styles, especially against slick counter punchers, which Duran demonstrated in his fight against him.
    Duran confused Hagler and made him hesitant.
    Though Hagler Rightfully won the fight, he didn't dominate against the smaller Duran the way he was expected too.
    I believe Leonard would've done even better and got the victory as early as 1982, when they were originally were set to fight.
    Hagler would destroy most of the great middleweights in history. Aggressive, powerful, middleweights that came at him allowed him to do what he did best in his prime, that was feast off of there aggression. He countered expertly.
    But force him to adjust to an opponents counters usually made him overthink .
    Leonard had that ability.
     
    ThatOne, zadfrak and Philosopher like this.
  8. Philosopher

    Philosopher Active Member Full Member

    1,329
    2,048
    Aug 10, 2024
    Very good post
     
  9. ThatOne

    ThatOne Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,711
    7,968
    Jan 13, 2022
  10. Journeyman92

    Journeyman92 Prayers for Pacman Full Member

    17,976
    19,964
    Sep 22, 2021
    Leonard isn’t a big fella, Toney is a natural 185-195lbs fighter, Leonard had his hands full with Duran on the inside… I’d really not like Leonard’s chances at close quarters here, he’d probably be overpowered, Toney is about as good as the best ever inside, same tier as fighters like Duran there, Leonard could not hurt him, could not get inside or at least shouldn’t and I think that after some heavy counters Leonard would get shy with his right hand, his arsenal would shrink as the fight would go on and Toney may just tame him to a UD.
     
    themaster458 likes this.
  11. Ike

    Ike Member Full Member

    364
    557
    Feb 20, 2025
    In a middleweight fight between these two great champions, I think Leonard's footwork and speed would have been decisive. Leonard won on points by a narrow but clear margin.
     
    zadfrak likes this.
  12. Journeyman92

    Journeyman92 Prayers for Pacman Full Member

    17,976
    19,964
    Sep 22, 2021
    That’s the issue with boxing peanut gallery’s… maybe it’s a human thing? We usually try to give a guy a few notable attributes in our head but really overall Toney was just good at everything… inside, outside everything in between JT didn’t throw a single punch wrong, could punch hard and fast he rarely made a mistake when he was on… and as Emmanuel Steward said “he was never convincingly beaten” funnily people who have shared the ring with Toney noted he was incredible when he synced up his hands and feet, got moving and really fought mobile. JT was the equal to guys like Robinson in terms of talent, skill and education and absolutely is under appreciated
     
  13. Boxed Ears

    Boxed Ears this my daddy's account (RIP daddy) Full Member

    55,508
    9,863
    Jul 28, 2009
    This fight would be like when Benny Hill used to slap Jackie Wright's head. Anyway, I'm goin' walk about.
     
  14. robert ungurean

    robert ungurean Богдан Philadelphia Full Member

    15,964
    14,823
    Jun 9, 2007
    I dont think 160 was a great weight for Ray. I'll take James here
     
    Journeyman92 likes this.
  15. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    50,650
    24,154
    Jan 3, 2007
    I would be inclined to favoring James Toney. While Ray Leonard certainly pulled off some miracles in his second career, middleweight simply wasn’t his division. In contrast, James Toney was undefeated under 168 and beat Mike McCallum and Michael nunn. Leonard was p4p the better fighter and a personal favorite of mine. But the parameters of this match don’t work to his advantage.
     
    Reinhardt likes this.