There's definitely been a thread asking about the most iconic win with Montreal Leonard being named as the best win consistently, but I wonder what happens if we widen it a bit? Louis-Schmeling I, FOTC, Pep beating Saddler?
In no order: Duran-Leonard 1 Ali-Foreman Jones-Toney Schmeling-Louis 1 Charles-Moore 3 HM: Douglas-Tyson Pep-Saddler Foreman-Frazier Louis-Schmeling 2
Greb Tunney Turpin Robinson Fitzsimmons Corbett Schmelling Louis Charles Burley I dunno.. so many man
Here's an old post I made for the top 3 wins in each division. Top 5 all time p4p is tricky. I'll have to think on that.
Duran - Barkley Pep - Saddler Barrera - Naz Duran - Leonard Frazier - Ali Honorable Mentions - Morales / Paq , LaMotta / Robinson and Schmeling / Louis.
What's the criteria? The "greatest" as in a great fighter looking absolutely awesome, well-night untouchable against another great fighter - a la perhaps Clay vs. Liston I (minus the vaseline episode?)? Or "the greatest" as in any schmo overcoming seemingly impossible odds to score an upset against a great fighter a la Douglas vs. Tyson? Either way, my #1 is Duran beating Leonard in Montreal. I also think the fight wasn't as close as the judges had it. I recall virtually no rounds where Leonard decisively won even. An honorable mention that is seldom mentioned is Harada vs. Jofre I. Yes, unlike Duran vs. Leonard I, this wasn't a decisive win, and many in fact have Jofre winning (though I didn't). But Harada was a natural flyweight moving up to fight arguably the greatest bantamweight ever, and it wasn't like Jofre was on his legs. In fact, after his 2nd loss to Harada, Jofre never lost again - and fought 10 more years, winning the featherweight title, beating no slouches in Legra and Saldivar. Harada I feel is criminally under-rated by most Western fans, partly due to two flagrantly bad decisions against Kingpetch (in their second fight) and against Famechon. Harada would've been undefeated as a flyweight but for the Kingpetch "loss" and a three-weight titlist, the first to go flyweight, bantamweight, and featherweight, but for the Famechon "loss." But for those two atrocious, likely corrupt, decisions, nobody with half a brain would debate who the best Asian fighter of all-time was.
Instead of counting this as a win for Chang, why not list the rematch, when Chang actually won? Or Amado Ursua going to Zapata's home country and knocking him out in the second round?