Do Crawford fans think Canelo is better than Hagler ?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by MarkusFlorez99, Jul 29, 2025.


  1. Salty Dog

    Salty Dog globalize the Buc-ees revolution Full Member

    10,055
    5,760
    Sep 5, 2008
    this is pretty arrogant...is that ok with you?
     
  2. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    59,970
    79,971
    Aug 21, 2012
    Canelo pisses radioactive, whereas I think Hagler was clean. That makes a considerable difference in comparisons.
     
  3. vargasfan1985

    vargasfan1985 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,068
    4,576
    Mar 8, 2008
    Clenelo’s daddy
     
    Braindamage likes this.
  4. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    399,134
    81,038
    Nov 30, 2006
    I wouldn't call myself a Crawford fan per se (am rooting for him next month, though) - but nobody on the planet should be rating Canelo above MMH. Ever.
     
  5. turbotime

    turbotime Hall Of Famer Full Member

    42,532
    3,731
    May 4, 2012
    I think Canelo will have a higher ranking, all time wise but h2h Hagler is too tough and consistent with his boxer punching style that would touch Canelo up over 15.

    I’ve always thought Canelos pace wasn’t that special and his biggest flaw, and Hagler was a workhorse type of fighter with an iron chin.
     
  6. Makingweight

    Makingweight Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,681
    433
    Dec 7, 2011
    Hagler the better fighter, both great chins and both cut off the ring well.

    I think Hagler would simply outwork Canelo and also happy to switch hit a great advantage.

    Canelo over the years many examples of giving rounds away by inactivity, against a fighter like Hagler that's fatal.

    Canelo also seems to be a bit one paced, Hagler many times the opposite knew when to turn the heat up.
     
  7. JusABoxinFan

    JusABoxinFan Active Member Full Member

    889
    786
    Apr 20, 2022
    Comprehension - The action or capability of understanding something.

    If you refuse to read something because there are too many words for you to glance and respond, then how are you going to understand what is being discussed. If you are conversing and/or debating a subject with someone, it is idiotic to continue by both parties with it's obvious and even announced that one refuses to comprehend what's being said because they don't want to read too many words. Because only idiots debate with each other ignorant of the message from the other..... Is that action okay with you?

    I'm good..... Moving on.
     
  8. drenlou

    drenlou VIP Member Full Member

    75,064
    39,476
    Jan 22, 2015