Terence Crawford and his place in boxing history after victory against Canelo

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Wladimir, Sep 15, 2025 at 2:51 AM.


  1. Wladimir

    Wladimir Active Member Full Member

    1,260
    914
    Sep 5, 2024
  2. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,781
    44,386
    Apr 27, 2005
    He's certainly well inside the top 100. He will settle in there somewhere when his career actually comes to a close, and he can be looked back on with surety and finality.
     
    mr. magoo, Bokaj and BoxingFanMike like this.
  3. THE BLADE 2

    THE BLADE 2 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,695
    4,436
    Jul 14, 2009
    He may have a cracked the TOP 25 ATGs rankings arguably the Top20. 3 weight division undisputed champ. IMO he ranks higher than Mayweather because he fights the best when they are in or near their prime.
     
    Last edited: Sep 15, 2025 at 8:37 AM
  4. The Funny Man 7

    The Funny Man 7 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,868
    2,048
    Apr 1, 2005
    I'd put him in the range of the Top 15. Which I'm sure will be an unpopular take on this forum

    I don't think anyone will ever catch up to the greatest of Sugar Ray Robinson or Henry Armstrong. And I think Harry Greb, Ali, and Willie Pep are also out of range

    Ezzard Charles, Archie Moore, Sam Langford, Roberto Duran, and Sugar Ray Leonard (maybe) are still ahead of Crawford on my list

    A lot of people will view this as blasphemy, but in my book Crawford is totally at home among guys like Hagler, Hearns, Pacquiao, Mayweather, Sandy Saddler, Marciano, etc.

    He's unequivocally the best fighter of his generation. He's been in the pound for pound top 10 for over a decade straight, with most of that inside the top 5. Undefeated at 42-0. Champion at 135, 140, 147, 154, and 168. Three weight undisputed champion. In my book, that gets you a spot in the Top 15 greatest ever

    If he moves down to 160 and becomes undisputed champ there, then he's absolutely in the top 10. That said, getting all the belts there at this age is probably a stretch, knowing how close he is to the end. But even picking up one or two would be another boost to his legacy
     
  5. Lonsdale81

    Lonsdale81 Member Full Member

    410
    602
    May 19, 2025
    It's about resume for me and apart from Canelo his resume is pretty lackluster by comparison.. and Canelo is not even that great either in my opinion... and don't give me the spiel about some great weight feat.. He's bigger than Canelo ffs..
     
    zadfrak likes this.
  6. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist

    26,575
    17,653
    Apr 3, 2012
  7. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist

    26,575
    17,653
    Apr 3, 2012
    It’s pretty damn good without Canelo. Madrimov and Postol were good undefeated champs when he fought them. Spence was fringe pfp, undefeated, and proven. It’s not Crawford’s fault that the guys he beat didn’t rebound (and that lost is a lot longer than the ones I named).
     
    The Funny Man 7 and Jakub79 like this.