Reality Check Time! Oleksandr Usyk is Still The P4P Number One Fighter On The Planet. This Is Why...

LOL can you repeat this in English?
The first time you quoted me you told me to STFU so you are obviously a disrespectful little puke. I suggest you pay more attention in school kid.

 

I didn’t bring up your intelligence. Also just to let you know college doesn’t=intelligence, especially in 2025. Charlie Kirk was right in a sense that college is a scam because most kids aren’t securing jobs that give them the ability to pay off their college debt in a reasonable time or at all. Especially this generation of kids who are lazy and entitled and don’t want to put the work in.

Anyways just settle down, and be more respectful. What you are doing is the equivalent of joining a NFL team as a rookie and disrespecting the OGs. If you were a veteran on this website, I probably wouldn’t have said anything. For what it’s worth I don’t think you’re an alt, I just think you’re a typical gen-z ******* kid.

 

But does college not offer more pathways than the usual? Also Im sorry that I was rude

 

You’re good, just be more respectful to the mods on here. You’re lucky you didn’t get banned. A lot of mods on any other forum would have banned you.

Anyways, I’m not trying to sabotage @CST80 thread anymore.

 

You mean the realest one here who actually walks it like i talk it and has all the **** i say i have??? Lmfao! Don't get mad at me that Crawford proved people like you wrong in impressive fashion and now you and other haters are in overdrive trying to pick apart Crawford and the win. Meanwhile people and publications with credibility have already moved him to #1 p4p.

Pbf is worthy of praise and if anything is underrated since he's better than both usyk and Crawford he's a top 15 atg they're not.

 

Usyk #1 and I'm not sure after that.

Bivol smoked Canelo and that was the end of the legit Canelo hype.

Usyk is fighting much larger guys. I was actually surprised that Crawford looked to be the same stature as Canelo.

Three incredible fighters in Usyk, Crawford and Inoue. I like all of them.

 

Conceit is gods gift to little men. Those who bark the loudest are the ones who are most afraid.
I respect the opinions of members on here more than a bunch of journo dorks who have never laced a glove in their life.

 

Your write-up on Crawford was outstanding.

He looked very comfortable at the new weight, and I understood why after what you wrote.

 

Charlo never got stopped and stopped them both in rematches. At least he didn't get punched around the ring by a fat unranked fringe contender and blown away by the first prime puncher he ever faced like aj was.

He can't be more overrated than aj in regards to your post. Even current Canelo is superior to aj in almost every department. Moving up 2 weight classes and beating an undisputed champion in Canelo > beating Joshua. That's the end of it.

I will say this once more, Fury was just as washed as Canelo, looked terrible against a lesser boxer than Scull, doesn't have a quarter of the achievements, cherrypicked more and doesn't even rank in the top 20 heavyweights of all time.

Canelo > Fury and aj

 

Had Canelo lost to them, like AJ lost to Ruiz they would have.

You're saying that bthe Ruiz win became better just because AJ lost to him. I disagree.

 

@CST80, i agree with a lot of this but not entirely. We can also pick holes in all resumes. For example, Fury was just coming off a controversial decision vs an MMA debutant.

Bellew was coming off wins vs Haye who was completely past it. You can make a great case that rematching Breidis (who actually gave Usyk a good fight) would have done more for Usyk's resume than beat Bellew who, despite Haye wins, was past it.

I have Usyk at #1 too. His overcoming of larger fighters is extremely impressive. I do think his resume has more depth than Bud's. But we can find faults in almost anyone's resume.