Terence Crawford vs Roberto Duran @147

I can't prove someone wrong when they're arguing in bad faith and ignore facts they dislike while accepting facts that fit their narrative.

 

Seems like a common issue with you makes you wonder........

 

No, it's just common with fanboys like you and him. I don't have this problem with 70% of the forum.

Unless you're going to start actually addressing what I say, I'm going to put you on ignore. You are Journeyman's disciple.

 

Beat you to it bum

 

Going with Duran. Crawford never fought anyone on Duran's level. Duran beat a prime Leonard who is > Crawford.

 

I don’t have bad faith to anybody , I’m a fan of Duran more than Leonard sure, but the fights are right there for us to see, when they were both in top condition Duran was the boss and the better fighter. I don’t see how anyone can look at the rematch and say they were both in top condition, Leonard just changed his style and was better.
That is just not true, it’s clear Duran isn’t in shape. There not Leonard’s fault, but it doesn’t change th fact that when they were both 100%, Duran was better.
I can’t speak for anyone else but I guess that makes me a ‘Duran fanboy’, anybody who likes boxing should be a fanboy because it’s the best performance we have on film IMO.
A clinic on feinting, hooking off the jab, taking away another ATG jab.
Duran of 78-80 would put a beating on Crawford.