Would Gennady Golovkin and Marvin Hagler be food for Roy Jones ?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by MarkusFlorez99, Sep 20, 2025.


How does it go ?

This poll will close on Jun 16, 2028 at 6:08 PM.
  1. Hagler is a tough fight but he beats GGG easy

    24.2%
  2. GGG and Hagler both give him a rough night, Jones is being overrated

    24.2%
  3. Jones clears both, he's a h2h nightmare

    51.5%
  1. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,926
    44,768
    Apr 27, 2005
    Top post mate, great points. Roy was a fighter who relied whose base was his god given talents. Reflexes, speed, instinct, sheer athleticism. At his peak he might even be the finest example in history. By comparison, late starting technicians like Hopkins and co take years longer to perfect their art. Roy by contrast just blitzed onto the scene. His physical and athletic attributes were other worldly.

    I'll go deeper than 95%, I'm not sure there's a guy at 160 I'd favor over him. SRR might match him up best. Having said that it's entirely possible he might lose to guys like Hagler and Monzon, but for me there's every chance he prevails as well. He was a special fighter, even at 160.
     
  2. THE BLADE 2

    THE BLADE 2 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,776
    4,528
    Jul 14, 2009
    Not necessarely green, but Roy's prime weight was 168, he was unbeatable at 168 but not at 160.
     
  3. m.s.

    m.s. Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,376
    8,181
    Nov 2, 2010
    Remember Hagler has that Bud Crawford switch hitting thing going too. That part of what makes him so dangerous. Also, he is hell for his opponents in rematches.
     
  4. m.s.

    m.s. Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,376
    8,181
    Nov 2, 2010
    Toney looked like crap in that fight do to weight problems. Most the time he was a great fighter though.
     
    THE BLADE 2 likes this.
  5. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,926
    44,768
    Apr 27, 2005
    He had plenty of struggles. Jones had a fair bit to do with him looking crap too, to state the obvious.
     
  6. bolo specialist

    bolo specialist Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,088
    8,156
    Jun 10, 2024
    The Tate win required not even 2 full rnds-worth of exertion - not nearly enough to completely rule out any impact from the drop in weight on his strength, durability, & stamina, which could've been tested if a Hagler or even a G took him into deeper waters. That he wasn't outright depleted by the drop to 160 doesn't mean he retained the exact same efficiency either.

    Duran had an extensive peak that spanned numerous fights below, @, & above 140, including wins over world class fighters like Viruet & Mamby w/in the 140 lb range. Not a comparable scenario IMO.
     
  7. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,926
    44,768
    Apr 27, 2005
    You think he was weight drained, i don't. Lets look deeper.

    In 1989 he came in at 157>155>155>157>157.5. Day before weigh ins! In 1990 it was 158>156.5>159.25>158.25>160.5>154!!!!!!>158.5!!!>153.25!!!!>160. 1992 was 158>160>159>163>164.

    When a guys coming in at 153 in day before weigh ins that late in the piece he's hardly struggling. He went 12 hard rounds with Hopkins just 12 months before he fought Tate. Was there ever any talk or evidence he was struggling? He was the consumate pro and it was day before weight ins. He was fine.

    At any rate Jones looked a million dollars at 160 and also 5 minutes after deciding to move after and go after bigger fish.
     
    Smoochie likes this.
  8. Journeyman92

    Journeyman92 Mauling Mormon’s Full Member

    19,201
    21,198
    Sep 22, 2021
    Hagler is too little, GGG has a game chance.