Which bummed you out more?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by quintonjacksonfan, Oct 11, 2025 at 7:40 AM.


Which Bummed you out more

  1. That we did not see Ali in his prime

    23 vote(s)
    50.0%
  2. Tyson lacked disicpline to have a chance to be the best heavyweight ever

    23 vote(s)
    50.0%
  1. Mike Cannon

    Mike Cannon Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,198
    7,556
    Apr 29, 2020
    Hi Pugguy.
    That's sort of what I was thinking, when I was responding to the good poster that is @roughdiamond, Ali only had the very short Quarry fight and Bonavena before Frazier, and as you say, gave Frazier the the fight of his life, and for me that says volumes about Ali.
    stay safe buddy, chat soon buddy.
    Mike.
     
    Pugguy likes this.
  2. MaccaveliMacc

    MaccaveliMacc Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,563
    6,869
    Feb 27, 2024
    You're forgetting the fact that if it wasn't for the exile, Ali would have fought Frazier in 1968 or 1969 at the latest. Frazier wouldn't be as experienced as he was in 1971, plus Ali would be at his absolute peak. In this scenario, Ali most likely beats Frazier, especially since at the end of the day FotC was very competetive until the last bell.
     
  3. META5

    META5 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,519
    2,412
    Jun 28, 2005
    The other aspect is that Frazier supported Ali in exile and then Ali's pre-fight rhetoric and playing Black identity politricks infuriated Joe. Without this, how 'driven' might an earlier version of Joe be compared to his FOTC self?

    Joe was hellbent on beating Ali and this combined with Ali's exile made for a unique fight dynamic. Interestingly, I've always heard it said that Yank didn't think that Joe was ready for Ali in 68 or 69.

    I've always been a believer that the Ali that was continuously defending his title, that was still training with the hunger and dedication of his pre-exile self doesn't lose to Joe Frazier in '68, 69 or 70.
     
    Last edited: Oct 13, 2025 at 7:01 AM
    MaccaveliMacc likes this.
  4. JackSilver

    JackSilver Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,096
    4,922
    Jun 24, 2017
    You could say Ali only beat Frazier when Frazier was past his best
     
    Jakub79 likes this.
  5. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,156
    13,126
    Jan 4, 2008
    Yes, I think it's more reasonable to look at the fights where they were about equal distance from their primes, and that's 2 and 3.

    And that Ali should have been DQd without even having a point docked is of course absolute nonsense. No ref in his right mind would do that. The ref should have been harder on his clinching tactics, yes, but you can't blame Ali for doing what the ref let him get away with.

    And let's not pretend Frazier was a saint. A key tactic for him was to hit Ali's hips when he couldn't find anything else, and that's technically below the belt but something the refs let slide. And of course Frazier also did what he was permitted to do.
     
    Pugguy likes this.
  6. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    82,062
    22,167
    Sep 15, 2009
    Tyson lacking discipline.

    I'm a firm believer in prime Tyson.
     
  7. nyterpfan

    nyterpfan Active Member Full Member

    525
    1,001
    Oct 7, 2021
    This was a tough call--but ultimately I went with the Ali selection just because I would have been curious to see how much BETTER he may have become after the 1967 Zora Folley fight--(when IMHO he was approaching a level no HW has reached before or since!!)