Dennis mccann

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by Faz42, Dec 13, 2024.


  1. boxberry92

    boxberry92 Active Member Full Member

    1,011
    1,540
    Jun 22, 2008
    If he’s just serving a “silent ban” and can reapply for his licence after two years, what’s the point? All this does is create a gap where there’s zero oversight. Who’s to stop him loading up on PEDs during that period — chances of being tested are basically nil. He could come back looking like a train.
     
    ash234 likes this.
  2. davidjay

    davidjay Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,351
    965
    Feb 23, 2009
    I can't help but think that doping would be virtually eliminated overnight if trainers were banned for as long as any fighter who got caught.
     
  3. Holler

    Holler Doesn't appear to be a paid matchroom PR shill Full Member

    13,245
    25,271
    Mar 12, 2018
    That's the part that really sticks in the throat, same tactics that Connor Benn adopted. Not sure what can be done, but I'd like to see an incentive for those boxers that admit it. Or perhaps more a disincentive to those who go the brass neck approach.
     
    Jamesofthenorth likes this.
  4. davidmcallister

    davidmcallister Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,862
    297
    Jun 15, 2011
    There is already incentives for admitting it, or at least there used to be. Don't y9ou remember the jack 3d ones where both Dillian Whyte and Enzo Macaranelli failed. Enzo got a ban much less than Dillian because he held his hands up.

    I think a part of the incentive may also include having to give the names of the people supplying the PEDS etc and that might be where most people don't want to be seen to do that because they would be seen as a 'grass' so to speak
     
    Holler likes this.