60 Liston vs 88 Tyson and which is historically above

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Fabiandios, Nov 27, 2025.


60 Liston vs 88 Tyson and which is historically above

  1. Liston beats him and is ahead in terms of legacy

    6 vote(s)
    18.2%
  2. Mike beats him and is ahead in terms of legacy

    13 vote(s)
    39.4%
  3. Liston beats him but Mike is ahead in terms of legacy

    13 vote(s)
    39.4%
  4. Mike beats him but Liston is ahead in terms of legacy

    1 vote(s)
    3.0%
  1. Reinhardt

    Reinhardt Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,179
    19,386
    Oct 4, 2016
    Head to head is an easy call,,Liston by KO.
     
    Marvelous_Iron likes this.
  2. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,282
    13,310
    Jan 4, 2008
    Does it? 15-6 here favour Tyson in terms of legacy. Actually, 16-6 if you include me.

    I think most have the outmost respect for how he demolished a solid long time contender like Berbick and also a lineal HW champion, among others. It might be in contrast to those who have that Tyson as unbeatable and TBE that it can seem like he's put down.
     
    JohnThomas1 likes this.
  3. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    53,368
    45,559
    Apr 27, 2005
    Personally yes, i think it does. Sure, he sure has his huggers but he's got a lot of critics/haters that have trouble assessing him fairly too. He's one of the many guys who stirs up lots of emotion vs balance and gets judges as such by many.

    16-6 proves my point, if anything. They are not miles apart in a heavyweight list but Tyson clearly has the better resume.
     
    Bokaj likes this.
  4. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,282
    13,310
    Jan 4, 2008
    Yeah, he clearly does. And the votes are clearly on his side.18-6 now, me included.
     
    JohnThomas1 likes this.
  5. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    53,368
    45,559
    Apr 27, 2005
    I take the vote differently. Tyson clearly has the better resume yet 25% have voted he doesn't. One quarter. That's tells a story to me.
     
    Bokaj likes this.
  6. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,282
    13,310
    Jan 4, 2008
    I don't think that's an unreasinable deviation. It could depend on how one views losses. The onoly one Liston lost to near his prime was Ali, the GOAT for most. The manner of the losses are, as you know, a chapter apart. :)

    Tyson on the other hand lost his title to someone whose next best win might be McCall. That might swing it for some.

    In terms of wins, it's Tyson hands down. And maybe those are what the TS refers to. But even then it might be more about overrating Liston's wins than denigrating Tyson's.

    I have a hard time understanding why so relatively many pick FOTC Frazier to beat Ali at his best, seeing how close a declined Ali pushed him, but that is probably in most cases due to what they feel for Frazier rather than Ali.
     
    swagdelfadeel and JohnThomas1 like this.
  7. MaccaveliMacc

    MaccaveliMacc Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,697
    7,116
    Feb 27, 2024
    Tyson has a better resume, but I would bet on Liston to beat him. Not a good style for Mike.
     
  8. MaccaveliMacc

    MaccaveliMacc Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,697
    7,116
    Feb 27, 2024
    Is it that clear tho? Mike's best win is Michael Spinks, Sonny's is Floyd Patterson. Floyd is a better win in terms of legacy, but not by much. Both KOed their rivals in dominating fashion. Quite similar top wins to be fair. Mike also has post prime Larry Holmes.

    On the other hand, Cleveland Williams, Niño Valdés, Zora Folley and Eddie Machen aren't much worse than Berbick, Thomas, Smith or Ruddock.

    Yes, Mike has more title fights and defences, but we need to remember, we can't compare these two numbers really. Mike won his belt off of a paper title holder. Sonny wasn't able to do so - there was only 1 champion in the division, who happened to avoid him for a bit. He was cleaning the division like Tyson did, but without a title attached to it. Both defeated similar amount of Top 10 competition. When it comes to the only thing comparable, so the lineal championship, Sonny has 1 title defence and Tyson has 2. Again - not that big of a difference.

    Liston lost his title to the GOAT, Mike was dethroned by a Top 10 contender. Mike was 23 at the time, Sonny was around 34. They both never reclaimed the real championship.

    I would say it's actually crazy, how similar their resumes are. As I pointed in my previous post, I think Mike's resume is better, but not by that much.
     
  9. Cojimar 1946

    Cojimar 1946 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,853
    1,785
    Nov 23, 2014
    Tyson was on top for only 2 years or so. That hurts him if you value longevity
     
  10. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,282
    13,310
    Jan 4, 2008
    You also have Tucker, Bruno, Biggs, Tubbs, Holmes and Williams for Tyson.
     
    Last edited: Dec 2, 2025 at 2:05 PM
  11. Marvelous_Iron

    Marvelous_Iron Active Member Full Member

    1,159
    1,458
    Jul 9, 2022
    Legacy...of course 88 Tyson since that negates Douglas loss, post prison career, and massive early 2000s decline

    The thing is Liston might just do him like Patterson, both 71 reach, Patterson was faster, Tyson had the potential to do more damage but would have a whole night of things not going his way, we never saw the 88 against a legitimate bad man with power, jab, and overall skill level like Liston

    At the same time there is always the chance 88 Tyson could KO him in the first round

    Overall slight advantage to Liston
     
    Last edited: Dec 2, 2025 at 11:52 PM