Anyone vouch for Rahman being a better than good fighter?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Mike_b, Jan 24, 2026.


  1. McCallumsJab

    McCallumsJab Active Member Full Member

    502
    615
    Jun 2, 2025
    He made it to be world champion despite limitations, his physicality and stamina alongside a solid jab and got right hand saw him overachieve. He has good wins and bad losses. His great win over Lennox is arguably a lucky punch but many fighters in history have equally lucky wins.

    Other brief world champions in history get praised with the same sort of ups and downs and again somewhat lucky wins. But if you boxed in the last 20 years you won't get that type of credit.
     
    Homericlegend03 and Mike_b like this.
  2. McCallumsJab

    McCallumsJab Active Member Full Member

    502
    615
    Jun 2, 2025
    Ruiz had a better quicker jab and more stamina. Maskaev timed big punches against his shakey defense.
     
  3. HistoryZero26

    HistoryZero26 Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,260
    6,321
    Jan 6, 2024
    He was a NABF/USBA double winner and lineal champion. He was 50-9.

    The reason you can blame him for losing to John Ruiz and Maskaev is because you'd expect him to win.

    Almost every single fighter we talk about on this site is better then good.
     
    Last edited: Jan 26, 2026
    Homericlegend03, Seamus and Mike_b like this.
  4. janitor

    janitor VIP Member

    72,021
    28,049
    Feb 15, 2006
    I will take Rahman's body of work if it is all the same.
     
    Mike_b likes this.
  5. janitor

    janitor VIP Member

    72,021
    28,049
    Feb 15, 2006
    You can take him or leave him at the end of the day, but at the end of teh day he prevailed.

    He became the immortal successor to John L Sullivan, an he did it by beating a Heavyweight Champion who many regard as one of the greatest ever, in very uncontroversial circumstances.

    Then for a victory lap, he won the WBC belt again.

    He can go to bed at night content with his resume.
     
  6. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    55,388
    50,027
    Apr 27, 2005
    At best you could plonk him somewhere in the area between good and very good, substantially closer to the side of "good" if you do. He was in the right place at the right time vs Lewis which is obviously his big rating stick. The rest of his career is a bit of a mixed bag.
     
  7. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    52,292
    27,900
    Jan 3, 2007
    Yeah he was better than average for sure. He was on the world scene for a while
     
    Homericlegend03 and Mike_b like this.
  8. Bigcheese

    Bigcheese Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,020
    2,664
    Jun 7, 2015
    The Maskaev losses are inexplicable. I guess some guys just have your number because he was definitely better than Oleg.
     
    Homericlegend03 and Mike_b like this.
  9. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist

    29,823
    20,258
    Apr 3, 2012
    I think he's deceptive because there just haven't been many fighters who were that physically strong. I don't think Tua liked dealing with a jab that heavy.
     
    Homericlegend03 and Mike_b like this.
  10. bigboxinghippo420

    bigboxinghippo420 Member Full Member

    256
    252
    Dec 23, 2021
    understandable, not only are they brutal defeats but fate almost made him fly out of the ring a second time!!!
     
  11. SouthpawsRule

    SouthpawsRule Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    1,544
    1,974
    Jul 2, 2025
    Being competent, strong and disciplined takes you very far in the HW division.
     
    Mike_b likes this.