Another name is Yanqui Diaz. He beat Juan Carlos Gomez and Vaughn Bean. That’s better than what Pianeta and Boytsov can say for themselves.
That's a good shout too. I think with some thinking, We could probably "discover" couple more fighters on that level that wouldn't immediately come to mind. Let's take Zuri Lawrence. Now, that's stretching it a bit in terms of top 50 probably - but He does have a win over Vidoz, draw with Austin, win over McCline and then Sosnowski. Of course, there are all those losses inbetween.. but I still find that type of career more impressive than, say, Boswell's. Guinn I think You got right too. I forgot that Pianeta beat Duhaupas. That's a solid win in retrospect.
Some great input, the bottom part of the list gives me the most trouble. I'll look at all your points in detail later.
IMO you have to look at the losses as wins. Guinn-wins over Dokiwari, Grant, Harrison, Bergeron and losses to Barrett, Liakhovich, Toney, Chambers, Hawkins, Thompson, I considered him, he is a 40-60 guy. Dimitrenko, I should have in. I have Krasniqi at 39, he also gave Chambers a good go and had several decent wins, I had him on my list but then lost him. Skelton, Sprott, Harrison, Rogan and Williams, I could have included any of them or none of them, I put Williams in at the tail but in truth when they stepped up, they struggled. Diaz, I actually missed in my trawl through the decade, the Gomez stoppage is a fine win and while his career was short with a lot of losses at the end, the Bean success the only other wothwhile win, he will probably get in at the bottom end when I review all of this.
I understand it in most cases - although looking at Nielsen or Boswell. They also lost whenever They stepped up, in that decade anyway. They just stepped up, out of their comfort zone, less often.
Danny Williams has more losses then Skelton(hes got more losses then just about any modern contender). Skelton debuting at 35 is about as good an excuse as there is for losing. Thats a full 5 years older then Luis Ortiz.