I'm not so sure. I like Mike's chances against Kenny. I don't see Kenny's crab offense being particurarly effective. I believe he's a live dog against Larry and Muhammad, though I like his chances better against the former. Joe is the question mark. What happens when the greatest infighter meets the greatest mid range fighter? I don't think any "school" him. School is my words, not Larrry's but that's always been the gist of his comments.
Larry was a great champion who I have a lot of respect for, but I don't think Mike losses to all his contemporaries as Larry claims. Norton was a winnable fight for Mike, and I still don't think any version of Larry beats MT.
There was a boxing historian, Mike Casey, who said that no iteration of Larry Holmes beats Tyson. That's just one man's opinion. OTOH lesser fighters beat a reasonably good version of Mike Tyson. Joe against Mike would be a banger. It might look like Marvin against Tommy. I just don't know who's Marvin and who is Tommy.
Muhammad Ali and George Foreman are the only two of the golden 70’s that I would give a real chance of beating a prime and fully motivated Mike Tyson….. and by fully prime and motivated I mean not the one who lost to Douglas… not the one who lost to Evander or Lewis or McBride or Williams…. I’m talking about the Tyson form the Berbick fight to the Spinks fight who was 100% focused with no external problems and had Kevin Rooney in his corner
Copium.. There's literally no one on Larry's resume before Tyson who I would favor to beat Tyson.. Speaking of the versions of each opponent Larry fought, of course.. (I'd favor prime Ali over Tyson)
What's ironic is that Mike said that if Larry was younger and active the fight would have been much different. Ali talked a lot of ---- but he was willing to give the other greats credit in his more quiet moments.
I've said this before, Prime Mike Tyson would be a nightmare in any era of boxing. Especially what we've seen in the past 20 yrs . Now specific fighters would be Prime Tyson’s kryptonite. But Kenny Norton at any stage of his career wouldn't be one of them. Norton had major issues against fighters that could force him backwards. He was not very good at cutting angles. Or angling away from attackers. He was very stiff legged. That's why he had major issues against Foreman , Shavers, and Cooney and was literally destroyed by all three early. He'd have major issues against prime Tyson also. And more than likely the results would be the same. And early ko loss for Norton
Loved Larry growing up and he is a top 5 heavyweight for sure. However Larry is full of it here, Ali and Foreman are the only 70s heavys who have a shot against prime Tyson. And Larry would never beat a prime Tyson, styles make the fight Tyson wins 10 out of 10. Ken Norton? He must be drinking Tyson kos Norton in 1 or 2 rounds EASY.
It’s cool that Larry Holmes has finally entered one-name celebrity status like Ali, Cher, Bono, Prince and Oprah. OP didn’t mention his last name in title or original comment and everyone immediately know who this was about. Not sure who ‘Mike’ is but I’ll figure it out.
Holmes was way past it. A shell of himself Prime Holmes would jab the **** out of an overrated Mike in a one sided fight .