Was Prince Naseem another Overrated hype job?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by NoChin, Jan 7, 2024.


Was Naz a great talent or overrated?

  1. Good, but not great

    33 vote(s)
    43.4%
  2. A great fighter

    36 vote(s)
    47.4%
  3. Not world class. Overrated.

    7 vote(s)
    9.2%
  1. GaylordOsmosis

    GaylordOsmosis New Member Full Member

    31
    20
    Feb 7, 2026

    That's the thing about undisputed, it's a good accomplishment but so much of it just depends on right place right time and the ABCs playing ball

    There would be a lot more undisputed champs out there the last 30 years if the ABCs treated them all the same
     
  2. travolt

    travolt Trolling the trolls Full Member

    3,532
    937
    Aug 1, 2011
    This added to his physical capacities (speed, power, accuracy, timing) and willingness to engage (confidence) made him a formidable threat for anyone. He beat up a lot of excellent fighters nobody did before or after him. He was half dead vs Barrera and still kept trying right until the end .
    His immaturity cost him big in the later part of his career, but he accomplished plenty in the meantime.
    Naz went into the ring with the mentality to test you and get you out of there, kill or die trying.That's very special; he easily could have developed into a safety-first (aka PBF) educated distance fighter if he wanted the money but that's just not who he was
     
    NoChin likes this.
  3. LoveThis

    LoveThis Sweet Science Full Member

    970
    1,218
    Feb 20, 2025
    On the history of boxing he stands out as a special one. The show, the style, the personality.

    Few are made for pro boxing like he was. Boxing would miss a lot if he had never been
     
    NoChin likes this.
  4. Ph33rknot

    Ph33rknot Take the risk or lose the chance Full Member

    24,369
    24,428
    Mar 5, 2012
    Good fighter but he could get out boxed why he swerved Marquez
     
    NoChin and hoopsman like this.
  5. travolt

    travolt Trolling the trolls Full Member

    3,532
    937
    Aug 1, 2011
    Kelley was world class. And still lasted only 4 rds.
     
  6. Mickc

    Mickc Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,981
    3,195
    Nov 28, 2015
    I’d say he was a great fighter and very entertaining however once it went to his head and he sacked Brendan Ingle he was never the same fighter again .
     
    James Hudson likes this.
  7. dogcatcher

    dogcatcher Active Member Full Member

    1,028
    182
    Dec 2, 2009
    More style than substance. He lost to his only a-class opponent on Barrera. Naseem never beat anyone of note. He's still fun to watch, but I wouldn't rate him with the best.
     
    hoopsman and TheBoxGod like this.
  8. TheBoxGod

    TheBoxGod New Member banned Full Member

    23
    29
    Feb 13, 2026
    I'd say both overrated and just 'good'.

    An entertaining fighter with some talent at a certain level. But more style than substance when it came to greatness.

    He was very fundamentally flawed, and could never mix it with the elite. Barrera showed he was far from the elites of the sport.

    If he had continued instead of retiring early, multiple losses would have happened. Like imagine him against fighters like Marquez, Morales, Pacqauio, Mayweather. He would have beaten very conclusively.
     
    hoopsman likes this.
  9. hoopsman

    hoopsman Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,607
    2,268
    Jul 24, 2005
    There's much truth here.

    I think Hamed was certainly physically gifted-- his power and speed were legitimate-- but he was also the beneficiary of the British hype machine and his endless capacity for self promotion.

    In short, he was a good fighter but an even better marketing man.
     
    NoChin likes this.
  10. bandeedo

    bandeedo Loyal Member Full Member

    36,595
    24,765
    Feb 19, 2007
    bit of a physical freak. had the body control and balance of a circus gymnast. thats how he could generate so much leverage in such odd positions. acutely aware of his center of gravity at all times. but his technique was easy to exploit at elite level. at lower levels he could baffle his opponents with his unique responses. but elites who can see 2 steps ahead, had responses for his responses. the follow up counters are what naz wasnt skilled enough to deal with.