Who would you choose (prior Joe Louis) to beat prime Gene Tunney

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Flavius, Jan 8, 2026.


  1. Flavius

    Flavius Member Full Member

    131
    143
    Nov 13, 2023
    Who would you choose to beat Gene Tunney in his prime if you could choose from boxers prior the rise of Joe Louis?
    Would you favor a boxer from that period from Sullivan to Braddock over the prime Gene Tunney?
     
    Rumsfeld and dmt like this.
  2. dmt

    dmt Hardest hitting hw ever Full Member

    13,190
    20,576
    Jul 2, 2006
    Sam Langford. I think Langford's pressure and power would be too much. I think Langford dealt with enough slick fighters to know how to cut the ring vs Tunney.

    Prime Dempsey vs Tunney is also a 50-50 fight.

    I don't have enough knowledge of Wills or Godfrey to make a pick because i don't have any footage. But since Tunney never faced those 6'4 220 plus pound giants, i suspect they would have a decent shot at beating Tunney too. But i don't have any footage of them to confidently pick them.
     
    Terror and Rumsfeld like this.
  3. White Bomber

    White Bomber Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,749
    3,183
    Mar 31, 2021
    Esti roman ?
     
  4. robert ungurean

    robert ungurean Богдан Philadelphia Full Member

    17,127
    16,869
    Jun 9, 2007
    Dempsey is my first choice....also
    Schmeling and Langford are considered
     
  5. HistoryZero26

    HistoryZero26 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,987
    6,030
    Jan 6, 2024
    190+ pound Braddock or Loughrans your guy. Langfords already mentioned good pick. After that theres Wills and thats about it.

    Miske wasn't as good against fellow LHW sized fighters. Godfrey was better against big fighters then P4P HW types.
     
    Rumsfeld likes this.
  6. Fergy

    Fergy Walking Dead Full Member

    32,078
    40,034
    Jan 8, 2017
  7. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    65,802
    52,947
    Feb 11, 2005
    Dempsey, Langford, Wills, Peter Jackson, John Sullivan, Sam McVea
     
  8. Melankomas

    Melankomas Corbett beats your favourite fighter

    8,262
    10,010
    Dec 18, 2022
    Dempsey, Sullivan, Wills, Fitz, Jeffries are the standouts for me.
     
    swagdelfadeel and Rumsfeld like this.
  9. Philosopher

    Philosopher Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,932
    3,072
    Aug 10, 2024
    Jack Johnson. Strong enough to control Tunney, quick and accurate enough to keep him off and smart enough to avoid counters. Peak Johnson was something I think...
     
  10. orcabeast

    orcabeast New Member Full Member

    62
    54
    Feb 28, 2026
    Langford, Schemling if you count him would probably win imo, I would say Johnson because of how strong he was but I think style wise that fight favors Tunney. Dempsey has a pretty good chance if given x amount of fights
     
    Rumsfeld likes this.
  11. Fogger

    Fogger Father, grandfather and big sports fan. Full Member

    9,477
    15,348
    Aug 9, 2021
    I would have to go with prime Jack Dempsey and prime Jack Johnson, as the fighters with the best opportunity to beat Gene.
     
  12. Melankomas

    Melankomas Corbett beats your favourite fighter

    8,262
    10,010
    Dec 18, 2022
    I’d put Johnson up there as well, maybe the strongest fighter Gene would’ve fought? It’d be interesting to see him try and overcome Jack’s suffocating controlling style.
     
    Terror and Rumsfeld like this.
  13. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,887
    17,174
    Jul 19, 2004
    Interesting thread, and some solid selections. Surprised no one mentioned Greb.
     
    janitor, mcvey and Saintpat like this.
  14. mattdonnellon

    mattdonnellon Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,776
    2,116
    Dec 2, 2006
    I'd add in Jeanette and Sharkey-at the time Jack was seen as a pick-em fight for Gene.
     
    mcvey likes this.
  15. Terror

    Terror free smoke Full Member

    3,247
    1,655
    Mar 22, 2010
    I came here to echo this sentiment, Johnson wouldn't just walk into Gene, he would tie him up, make it ugly and under early 1900s rules he would be able to use his size and clinchwork to the max. With Tunney you can't have sloppy defense, so that's why I like Johnson here. I think the footwork battle would be a huge advantage for Tunney and I'm not sure Jack would be able to land at distance, but if he was able to consistently lunge in and then clinch bully him for extended periods, Tunney would wear down and lose imo.