was Lennox lewis always better then Tyson?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by victoire, Mar 29, 2026.


who is better

  1. Tyson better

    30 vote(s)
    50.8%
  2. Lewis better

    30 vote(s)
    50.8%
Multiple votes are allowed.
  1. victoire

    victoire New Member Full Member

    15
    23
    Mar 13, 2026
    For all those who say Lennox Lewis was a better fighter than Mike Tyson, yes, he eventually became a better fighter, but let’s put it like this. Imagine if Lennox Lewis had made his pro debut in 1986, the same time Tyson did in 1985. Since people always say Lennox was a late bloomer, that would have meant he would have fought Tyson in 1986 or 1987.
    If you remember, people always say Lennox Lewis’ peak was in 1997, and he made his pro debut in 1989. That means it took eight years for Lennox to become a complete fighter. So, if he had debuted in 1986 alongside Tyson, he would have had to face Tyson before he ever reached his peak. His peak might have never happened because he would have been beaten up early in his career. By the end of the 1980s, if he was actively fighting, he likely would have lost to Mike Tyson.
    The point is simple: Lennox Lewis became great later, but Tyson reached his prime early and would have been a nightmare for an unfinished Lennox. So no, Lennox was not always better than Tyson—he just became better later.
     
    Smokin Bert likes this.
  2. Jakub79

    Jakub79 Active Member Full Member

    1,467
    1,545
    Mar 3, 2024
    If Lewis' peak was in 1997, how come he was rated 32nd in The Ring's 1998 historical heavyweight rankings? Did none of the publicists or experts understand what a great champion we were dealing with? And how come Holyfield was the clear favorite in their first fight, even though a year earlier it was clear he was already past his prime?
     
    Bigplatts and heerko koois like this.
  3. Joeywill

    Joeywill Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,324
    3,181
    Aug 2, 2021
    Mike Tyson was undisputed champ when Lennox wasn't even pro yet
     
    Jakub79 likes this.
  4. MaccaveliMacc

    MaccaveliMacc Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,658
    9,736
    Feb 27, 2024
    Holyfield wasn't a clear favorite in their first fight. He was a favorite, but slight.
     
  5. heerko koois

    heerko koois Obsessed with Boxing

    25,241
    19,786
    Apr 26, 2006
    1988 Tyson beats any version of Lewis imo.....
     
    Vegas Hobo, Jakub79, Mickc and 5 others like this.
  6. TNSNO1878

    TNSNO1878 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,884
    3,649
    May 5, 2025
    Yes he was - dimensions above Tyson as an amateur, culminating in an Olympic gold, beat every man he faced as a pro, and has multiple grade-A wins that are miles ahead of Tyson's resume. Not to mention Lennox is older. Tyson peaked at 24. I'm surprised this poll is so one-sided. A peak 88 Tyson would have given Lewis a close fight, but Lennox was always the better boxer.
     
    Last edited: Mar 30, 2026
  7. vargasfan1985

    vargasfan1985 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,435
    5,776
    Mar 8, 2008
    bettings odds have zero to do with reality
     
    Jakub79 and destruction like this.
  8. ruffryders

    ruffryders Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,749
    1,235
    Oct 7, 2010
    Who knows, timing of fights is everthing
     
    DJN16 likes this.
  9. Jakub79

    Jakub79 Active Member Full Member

    1,467
    1,545
    Mar 3, 2024
    Right. However, from what I remember, in The Ring's poll, trainers, boxers, and journalists also rated Holyfield higher, even higher than the official odds. I don't think anyone knew back then that they were dealing with a boxer as great as he is today.
     
    vargasfan1985 likes this.
  10. bandeedo

    bandeedo Loyal Member Full Member

    36,624
    24,800
    Feb 19, 2007
  11. Wizbit1013

    Wizbit1013 Drama go, and don't come back Full Member

    15,242
    19,558
    Mar 17, 2018
    OP clearly not a fan of Lewis is he
     
  12. Reinhardt

    Reinhardt Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,517
    20,038
    Oct 4, 2016
    With both fighters at their best, Lewis has the tools to frustrate him and take a UD ,probably a late stoppage. Mike does have the punchers chance but for me styles, reach,and height favor Lennox.
     
  13. slash

    slash Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,718
    3,742
    Apr 15, 2012
    Yep
     
  14. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    55,162
    49,397
    Apr 27, 2005
    Tyson would have a punchers chance but best for best Lewis has the necessary ingredients.
     
    MaccaveliMacc likes this.
  15. Glassbrain

    Glassbrain Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,013
    2,046
    Apr 9, 2016
    Yes.

    Talent wise, no - Tyson had the edge on most fighters in history in terms of ability to fight, but talent will only get you so far. In terms of dedication, consistency and actual achievements as a heavyweight, Lewis was always better.