Wilder's victory over Chisora was the fight of the century - and here's what they should do next "The fight of the year? No. The fight of the decade. No. This was the Fight of the Century. Rarely, if ever, in fact, has boxing roared to a prizefight of such relentless action, so many punches of so much devastating power, such exhibitions of courage under bombardment that it will take months for these monumental gladiators to recover. If ever they really do." Source: DailyMail. Tried to post thread this morning and isn't appearing for some reason when adding the link. Trying again without.
It was a decent watch in a low skill, car crash can't take your eyes of it kind of way, but fight of the century? **** me, Jeff.
Why is it that everything that Chisora has done in the last ten years gets viewed as massive? If that Pulev card wasn't rigged (he lost that), the last four years of this nonsense wouldn't have happened. This notion that he almost beat Usyk, almost beat Parker, it's absolute rubbish. Anyone who is anyone beat him.
Chisora is a marketing phenomenon who always manages to fall upwards. He lost a European title fight and his next was for a world title. He lost that and went straight into a big-money stadium fight. He's lost almost every time he steps up, only has a 1-4 record for the European belt, yet he's a PPV big name and always the crowd favourite. You have to admire him for that.
Mr Birch, what went through your mind when you had decided this was a worthy thing to post on a boxing board?
This is like the entire British boxing psyche encapsulated into a paragraph; yes there was little skill on display, but the two oafs punched each other in the face a lot and I enjoyed watching it, so it's fight of the century.