Who would you pick to beat prime Ezzard Charles at LHW?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Flavius, Apr 6, 2026.


  1. ETM

    ETM I thought I did enough to win. Full Member

    13,678
    12,344
    Mar 19, 2012
    Agreed on Dwight. He was a force at that weight. He crushed everyone on his way up. He had the misfortune of being in Spinks era. Qawi was an intimidating little guy.
     
  2. ETM

    ETM I thought I did enough to win. Full Member

    13,678
    12,344
    Mar 19, 2012
    I'm not saying that Marshall definitely beats Charles or that he should be favored.
    Considering Ezzard was an elite fighter near the top of his game at that weight. There's not many that have a chance. Marshall was able to do it once so he's got a chance. Otherwise its a dire situation.
     
    InMemoryofJakeLamotta likes this.
  3. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    41,860
    11,168
    Mar 7, 2012
    Him not winning a belt isn’t relevant.

    There’s been belt holders nowhere near as good.

    Look at the circumstances.

    Look at his resume.

    His ability.

    He beat Archie Moore 3 times.

    Moore himself was amazing.

    Most fans have Ezzard as the GOAT at LHW.
     
  4. Flavius

    Flavius Member Full Member

    131
    144
    Nov 13, 2023
    What do you think about peak Beterbiev or Canelo at 175lbs? How much chance do they have?
     
    Last edited: Apr 10, 2026
  5. Melankomas

    Melankomas Corbett beats your favourite fighter

    8,266
    10,018
    Dec 18, 2022
  6. HistoryZero26

    HistoryZero26 Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,013
    6,050
    Jan 6, 2024
    And Bivins and Marshall both knocked Charles down in the rematches they lost. Affirming that Charles's chin was a weak spot. My opinion is not just based on those losses.

    You could flip that and say Marshall was on the decline. And Bivins Bivins is one of those guys who was on a different level during a win streak who came down to earth.

    The 4 wins over Bivins were all at HW though Ezzard was under 175 for 1.
     
  7. Blaxx

    Blaxx Active Member banned Full Member

    565
    672
    Feb 8, 2018
    Charles only truly campaigned at LHW between 1946 against Tommy Hubert to 1948 when he beat Sam Baroudi. This is when he's weighing in at about 175lbs and the opponent is also weighing in at around the same. (The Elmer Ray fight in this time period is the only one that's off as Ray outweighed him by a lot - it's also the only loss in that time period, spanning 23 fights, and it's a pretty agreed upon robbery).

    As a LHW, against another LHW, I don't favor anyone to best him. Spinks, Foster, Roy Jones Jr, Qawi and a few more might make it competitive but I rate Charles as close to the most complete fighter of all time if not the outright most complete one. He's also faced every kind of fighter and I don't think awkwardness will be his kryptonite - what's more awkward than Walcott?


    I think I'd be most interested in Charles vs Tunney or a young Patterson. If I was looking for a potential defeat at 175lbs
     
    InMemoryofJakeLamotta and Loudon like this.
  8. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    55,078
    49,175
    Apr 27, 2005
    Charles chin was not a weakness. Post war he went on a 40 fight streak where he wasn't stopped and lost just one very controversial decision.....to a top 5 heavyweight contender that outweighed him by 20 pounds while Charles himself weighed inside the light heavyweight limit. Charles knocked him out in a rematch while again weighing inside the light heavyweight limit. Beastly performances from someone inside 175 pounds.

    Marshall had a flash KD and Bivins, a great fighter himself, dropped him once in four rematches. He also beat Moore, one of the greatest knock out artists in history, three times in a row.

    There's also 9 heavyweight title defenses in that 40 fights.

    To content his chin is a "weak spot" given the resume and intangibles he has is ridiculous. I claimed the same when i first joined this forum. Dear o' dear, how little did i know about the old timers and Charles at that point.

    Charles four wins over Bivins spaced over more than a half a decade are null and void because his win streak came to and end? LOLOL


    Strange how you negate to say he also beat him while weighing 175. That's light heavyweight you know? Yeah? So now we are up to two. He pumped Bivins twice while giving away 10 pounds plus of weight advantage. If their next match he was all of 1 pound over 175 lol.

    Charles once he filled out and hit his straps was just a bit better than the likes of Moore, Marshall, Bivins and countless other fantastic fighters. This is really saying something.
     
    Greg Price99 and Loudon like this.
  9. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    41,860
    11,168
    Mar 7, 2012
    Whatever JT.

    He wasn’t beating Tarver!
     
    JohnThomas1 likes this.
  10. Ike

    Ike Active Member Full Member

    865
    1,230
    Feb 20, 2025
    For me the best Roy Jones would have been the favorite against all the best boxers from 160 to 175 pounds. Charles-Tunney would have been a great fight, we're talking about two of the three best light heavyweights of all time in my opinion.
     
  11. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    55,078
    49,175
    Apr 27, 2005
    You got me, i bow to his eccentric genius.
     
    Loudon likes this.
  12. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member

    98,469
    30,290
    Jun 2, 2006
    I wouldn't confidently pick anyone but Tunney,Lewis,Delaney,Johnson, Conn,and Loughran would give him good go's imo.
     
    Turnip mk3 likes this.
  13. Turnip mk3

    Turnip mk3 Active Member Full Member

    1,043
    1,158
    Feb 6, 2021
    No one with any certainty.
     
  14. Titan1

    Titan1 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,417
    2,978
    Oct 18, 2004
    I think Spinks and Foster have a shot. Don't know about them winning though.
     
    Turnip mk3 likes this.