Usyk the obvious number 1. Joshua ahead of Fury in 2,3. Parker & Dubois ive got ahead of Wilder in 4,5,6. Our Lord and Saviour Fabio Wardley is a Dubois flatline away from jumping in the mix for 4/5.
Yes I can see where your coming from with that list,the thread title is misleading as it says active Heavyweights but only Usyk Fury Joshua Wilder are mentioned in the thread by the op .
Why does Joshua get so much credit for going life and death with dethroned Wlad, failing to fight his biggest rivals while they fight each other 3x, and losing four times? Did the Jake Paul fight sway it for you?
Isn't everyone the "Away" fighter when they fight in Saudi? Unless you're from there, I mean. I don't know how boxing in Riyadh and Tuscaloosa both count as someone being the "home fighter" ... for example. They aren't even on the same side of the world.
This is a difficult question. For one reason, it's difficult to say so-and-so is the "active" fighter who has the best resume, and then list guys he fought (like Wlad) who have been retired for a decade. It just doesn't sound right. (Just like it wouldn't sound right to say the answer is Oliver McCall, who fought more recently than Andy Ruiz has, and name a bunch of guys Oliver beat in the 90s.) A lot of fighters on some of these guys' resumes are long gone. Meanwhile, there are up-and-coming guys who are actually fighting active boxers now or next. The problem is, the younger guys aren't so active. If you are counting "their top opponents" who are also active ... I'd say Joseph Parker probably has the best resume at the moment. Then again, Parker is either fighting or sitting out a drug ban, himself. But top active fighters Parker has faced are Wardley, Bakole, Zhang, Wilder, Joyce, Chisora, Joshua, Whyte, H. Fury (is he a top fighter?) ... and if you want to consider Andy Ruiz active (he hasn't fought in a while), you can add him, too. For Parker, that's eight or 10 different guys (depending on your take of Hughie and Andy). That's a lot of different fighters. And Parker has just turned 33. Derek Chisora has fought Wilder, Wallin, Joyce, Fury, Parker, Kabayel. Usyk, Whyte, and Pulev (although he may be retired now). So that's eight or nine guys. Fury has fought Usyk, Wilder, Whyte, Chisora, Wallin, Mahkmudov. Six guys. Joshua has fought Usyk, Dubois, Whyte, Wallin, Franklin, Pulev (who may be retired now) and *Ruiz who may or may not be active. Five or seven guys. Zhang has fought Parker, Wilder, Joyce, Kabayel, Hrgovic. Five guys. Next up ... TBD or Zhang may be retired, too. Dubois has fought Usyk, Joshua, Hrgovic, Joyce. Four guys. And next up is five ... against Wardley. Kabayel has fought Zhang, Sanchez, Mahkmudov, Chisora. Four guys. Next up TBD. Wilder has fought Chisora, Fury, Parker, Zhang. Four guys. Next up TBD. Usyk has fought Chisora, Fury, Joshua and Dubois. Four guys. Next up - a guy with one fight. (Not relevant.) Joyce has fought Chisora, Parker, Zhang, Dubois. Four guys. Next up - TBD. Wardley has fought Clarke, Huni, Parker. Three guys. Next up is four ... Dubois. Hrgovic has fought Zhang, Dubois, Joyce. Three guys. Next up is Allen (who isn't a top guy. Not relevant.) Ajagba has fought Sanchez, Vianello, Bakole, Martin (is questionable). Three or four guys. Miller has fought Ruiz, Dubois. Two guys. Next up is three ... against Pero. Sanchez has fought Ejagba and Kabayel. Two guys. Next up is three ... Richard Torrez. Huni has fought Wardley and Clarke. Two guys. Next up ... TBD *Ruiz (again, he hasn't fought in years) has Miller, Joshua, Parker. Three guys. Next up TBD. (Again, don't know if he is "active" or should even be mentioned.) But, if we were going with the guys who are actually fighting top heavyweights and likely will fight more, I think Parker is the clear number one. Then again, he could be out for two years, himself. It's difficult to gauge anymore. After Parker, clearly Wardley and Dubois are the guys to watch. Kabayel and Hrgovic (whether that inspires hope or not) are in the mix, too (Ejagba is getting a push from Zuffa) ... but Parker has more than double the significant opponents they all do. And Kabayel has only averaged about one fight a year for nine years now.
I can see putting Fury’s resume above Joshua’s, considering AJ has lost more fights, but Fury doesn’t have better wins.
You are quick to point out ages to suit a narrative but try to be balanced If you are going to be complete with that, why did you not note Chisora was only a couple of weeks away from being 39 when Fury last fought him Or that Usyk was nearly 38 when he beat Fury a second time for example? Point I'm making is that you seem to have a narrative in that the difference in age of Povetkin when Joshua beat him, to the age of Chisora in Fury's last fight with him is very similar, something like 6 or 7 weeks Also for Joshua you didn't note Martin Wins against champions: (Parker, Ruiz and Martin)
All Tyson Fury has going for him is the man who dethroned Wladimir. The Deontay Wilder victories have aged like absolute milk. People talk about Joshua losing to Dubois and Ruiz, Fury didnt face either of them. Just like people laughed at AJ for losing back to back to Usyk, they all said Tyson would beat Usyk with ease, just a small middleweight, he got battered. The same people that will also say he batters Ruiz and Dubois without actually fighting them. People use the Dubois and Ruiz losses as factors as to why Furys career is better... Hes not fought them himself so the losses to fighters Fury hasnt touched are irrelevant. Whatever way you weigh up their career accolades, Joshua trumps Fury. As a Defending World Champion Fury beat Whyte Wilder & Chisora... As a Defending World Champion Joshua beat Breazeale, Molina, Klitschko, Takam, Povetkin, Parker, Pulev... Fury defeated an unbeaten Champion in Deontay Wilder & AJ defeated a unbeaten Champion in Joseph Parker, Pretty sure i know which one aged better. Everyone likes to bring up how old Klitschko was when AJ beat him, the guy was a few months shy of his 40th birthday when Fury beat him yet its overlooked because he hadnt lost in so long but when the wins over Povetkin and Pulev get brought up, they are discredited for being the same age Klitschko was when Fury beat him even though they themselves had beaten a vast number of contenders each losing only to Wlad. Everyone likes to breakdown and discredit what AJ has done and who hes beat but its so far clear of Furys resume. If you really break down Furys resume its extremely thin. Wladmir regardless of age is the standout win, he should get alot of credit for this. Defeating Deontay Wilder is so exaggerated its crazy. What did Wilder do other than knockout Luis Ortiz to warrant Fury getting so much credit and applause? What did Wilder do in his career, who did he beat in them 40 odd fights and 5 year title reign that was so much more impressive than who the likes of Povetkin, Pulev, Parker, Ruiz have beaten??? Its all good speculating that Tyson would have beaten the likes of Povetkin, Pulev, Dubois, Ruiz etc but the reality is he didnt and we are working with facts here, instead he spent his time fighting Deontay Wilder and Derek Chisora. This whole life and death thing again only works with the Klitschko fight because it benefits the Fury > Joshua Narrative.. Ngannou had Fury scrambling, Joshua flatlined him, Wallin butchered the face of Fury, Joshua made him quit... To put Tyson Furys resume into perspective... Arslanbek Makhmudov is a Top 5 Fury victory. A near 40 fight career, a career where hes now had 13 odd fights since first becoming world champion, a decade later, and Arslanbek Makhmudov is a Top 5 career victory...
Unfortunately Fury looked so old and slow against Makhmudov. I wish AJ from Povetkin fight could fight Fury vs 1st Wilder fight. Then we could conclude who's better, Fury or AJ. Usyk is out of comparison, he's the undisputed king of heavyweight division.
If Joshua had beaten Wilder you'd have seen the celebrations from space, and many would have been crowning him the GOAT. Fury ruined Wilder, no one melted down so badly following a loss/losses. And given Joshua was KO'd by Ruiz and Dubois, it's very likely Wilder would have got him too, likely multiple times over a trilogy in America. Fury hasn't fought Ruiz (lol) but Joshua hasn't fought Wilder, his main rival at the time. Or Chisora. Or Cunningham. I don't think Ruiz beats any of those fighters. What's more, Ruiz ducked Fury, ducked Wilder, ducked Zhang. He prefers to fight bums, or former contenders who are 40+, and when he doesn't, he fails to win (except against AJ). It's not Fury's fault if the obese midget won't get in the ring. Nor can we assume that Fury would lose just because Joshua did, any more than we can assume Fury would have lost 14 times against Chisora's opponents. He doesn't need to fight Robert Helenius to prove he's better than him. "in Joseph Parker, Pretty sure i know which one aged better." Parker, in his prime, went on to lose to Whyte, Joyce (KO11) and Wardley (KO11). He deserved to lose to Chisora 1. Parker won't be getting in the HoF based on what he's done in his career. "Povetkin and Pulev get brought up, they are discredited for being the same age Klitschko was when Fury beat him" 39 is old for a heavyweight, 41 is obviously worse. Unbeaten in 11 years in better than schooled in your last fight 17 months ago. Fighting away as B-side is harder than fighting at home as A-side. Winning via clear decision and hardly taking any shots is better than going life and death. The Wlad fight counts for more than Ngannou, Wallin or Kevin Johnson because Wlad represents the zenith of either man's win column. It's also easier to fight someone after they're a known quantity, and Fury often comes into lesser fights in poor condition. When Fury was in the position of getting a mutual opponent after Joshua (Whyte, probably Joshua's 3rd best win), he destroyed him without taking a significant punch. The Parker's, Whyte's, Pulev's and Ruiz's are all, without exception, Chisora-level. They were not sold that way at the time though. "What did Wilder do in his career" He was ranked in the Ring top 4 for a consecutive 9 year period, rare historically. He had 41 KO's in 43 fights going into Fury 2, and had dropped or stopped all of his opponents. He had done significantly more in the sport than either Ruiz or Dubois had when they destroyed Joshua. If Wilder had been an easy fight for Joshua, they would have made it for 50-50, which Hearn/AJ never offered. "Arslanbek Makhmudov is a Top 5 Fury victory" Wlad Wilder x2 Whyte Chisora x3 Cunningham Wallin Makhmudov 10th best win, 7th best unique opponent. He'd also be in Joshua's top 10, around Breazeale and Takam.
I didn't note Martin because he didn't make the top 10 wins cut. 39+ is an age that appears very frequently in Joshua's resume, and Chisora 3 is the only 38 year old on Fury's. Fury was also past his best when he fought Usyk, so the age differential is less important to stress there. My point is there is a pattern of Joshua fighting old opponents while being much younger and fresher himself. If you look at the top 5 oldest wins on the list between Fury and Joshua, Joshua has 4 of the 5. For me, it's a notable pattern.
I’m not a Wilder fan however Wilder stopped Ortiz in 10 rounds in 2018. Wilder stopped Ortiz in 7 rounds in 2019. WIlder stopped Arreola in 8 rounds in 2016. That’s three wins there more impressive than Ruiz did. Wilder stopped Brezeale in 1 round in 2019. Wilder stopped Helenius in 1 round in 2022. That’s two wins there more impresssive than Joshua did . Post 2022 I have to say Wilder has looked badly shot and whilst Joshua is not the same fighter he does not look as shot as Wilder .
Not saying age can't be a factor but you note Whyte as a good win for Fury (as do I) yet it doesn't mean Whyte was better than a 39 year old Povetkin. That 39 year old Povetkin was top 5. The nearly 41 year old Povetkin beat Whyte before Fury scored a win over him. Fighters age differently