Does Sullivan have any claim to being the youngest champion ever?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Melankomas, Apr 15, 2026.


Does John L. have any claim here?

  1. Yes

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  2. No

    1 vote(s)
    100.0%
  1. Melankomas

    Melankomas Corbett beats your favourite fighter

    8,258
    10,005
    Dec 18, 2022
    I’m mainly talking about people who still regard Patterson as the youngest champ ever due to a lower regard for alphabet belts, would the same apply to John L. here? Goss was the reigning champ

    From Adam Pollack’s 2016 Sullivan book, page 17:

    On Tuesday April 6, 1880 in Boston's Music Hall, the 5'9" 178-pound 42-year-old Joe Goss gave a gloved "exhibition" against the 5'10 ½" 190-pound 21-year-old Sullivan, "the coming man." 1,800 spectators witnessed the bout.

    Sullivan dominated. In the 1st round, Sullivan exhibited skill and “planted blow after blow with his left on the face of the champion." Even when Goss occasionally landed, Sullivan countered him.

    In the 2nd round, after several rapid exchanges, Sullivan landed "no less than four sledge-hammer-like blows upon the right ear of Goss, and the latter went reeling to the floor. He was assisted to his feet by the master of ceremonies, who, thinking that the champion had only slipped, left him to get to a seat upon the stage." However, "Goss went reeling like a drunken man about the stage, and the danger of his falling among the audience was so great that the master of ceremonies at last realizing his situation, at once caught him and assisted him to a sitting on the platform." Goss was wobbly and out of it. In today's world of boxing, it would be a technical knockout.

    Goss was given time to recover, somewhat in LPR fashion. Sullivan promised to spar lightly with him for another round, so Goss agreed.& Goss later was quoted as saying of Sullivan that a blow from "that damned savage is worse than the kick of a horse."

    This bout really put Sullivan's name on the map. In essentially stopping Goss in 2 rounds, it was obvious that he was the best fighter in the country, if not the world. However, because it was a Queensberry rules exhibition and not a "real" fight to the finish under LPR rules, Sullivan was not considered the champion by the traditional fight purists, because he had not defeated Goss via the accepted championship rules. In truth, even at this point, he was the best gloved Queensberry rules fighter in the world.

    However, there were no gloved champions to defeat, because there was no such thing as a Queensberry rules champion.

    Sullivan was 21 years and 5 months old when he fought Goss whereas Patterson was 21 years and 10 months old when he fought Moore.
     
    roughdiamond and apollack like this.
  2. Historical boxing society

    Historical boxing society Member Full Member

    195
    216
    Feb 14, 2023
    I would say no. Although Gross won "a heavyweight championship" He lost to Jem Mace & right before Sullivan he lost to William Miller.
    So Joe Gross is likely an ABC champion. They created world title's often in this Era. I guess a case could be made as this is how Paddy Ryan became champion. IDK. Notice it states "american Heavyweight Champion" Indicating several champion's.

    If he was a bit of a undisputed King I would say yes.... I'd accept the victory as a win for sullivan. Certainly my option isn't facts, but if he lost his only real bout just prior to Sullivan to Miller (who actually at least was considered to have beaten) Foley whatever linage Sullivan claimed would have been transferred to a non american in William Miller. So Joe Gross is a bit like Ernie Terrell basically.

    But as far as beating a heavyweight American Champion, I would give him credit.
    But sometimes these Exhibition's guy's aren't trained properly expecting a lighthearted affair...This is the exactly excuse Joe Goddard used losing to Paddy Slavin far after this time frame. Goddard and many others used this excuse the line is long in getting steamrolled in an Exhibition. There's the notice of how serious you take it. The argument can be made for both sides.
     
    Last edited: Apr 15, 2026
    roughdiamond and Melankomas like this.
  3. Melankomas

    Melankomas Corbett beats your favourite fighter

    8,258
    10,005
    Dec 18, 2022
    If Sullivan and Miller fought in the early 1880s the lineage would be a lot less confusing. Apparently Paddy Ryan beat Miller with the gloves as well before he fought Sullivan, so things get even more confusing.
     
  4. Historical boxing society

    Historical boxing society Member Full Member

    195
    216
    Feb 14, 2023
    Yeah I know. But Miller was at one point after Foley was a legitimate Champ. Even though they tried to say he had a draw with Foley. He's recognized as the Australian champion.

    That's actually a dream matchup Miller was very durable and a part Time boxer he was a wrestler a referee and a great trainer. He barely spent time boxing. But Miller vs Sullivan would of been great. Miller was a strongman in a London Prize ring rules Sullivan would have been facing one of the most athletic people of his career who was just as strong as him. Miller is even more beefy than the other wrestler type Jem Smith who was ripped but had less strategy. Miller was so good he could do it part time & still be effective. As a world champion wrestler he would certainly have taken Sullivan down to the ground more than a few times in London Prize rules. He was far more educated at over all combat than was Sullivan at that time.

    It would be interesting to see if any bareknuckle champion could beat that timeline in youngest age. I just don't know enough about them.
     
    Last edited: Apr 15, 2026
    Melankomas likes this.
  5. Melankomas

    Melankomas Corbett beats your favourite fighter

    8,258
    10,005
    Dec 18, 2022
    Sullivan definitely seemed to improve as a grappler later on due to Muldoon, but he also seemed to be in a different class as a boxer compared to Miller and keep in mind Miller never fought anyone as explosive or powerful Sullivan either. Ryan tried grappling with Sullivan too and it didn't do him much good, Flood did as well and the reports I've read specifically emphasized how Sullivan's explosive short punches on the inside prevented that from happening. Would Miller know how to deal with that type of power?

    That being said, people overlook Miller way too much. Beating Larry Foley is an incredible feat and from what I've read apparently he didn't solely incorporate wrestling to do it. He probably had some hands.
     
  6. Historical boxing society

    Historical boxing society Member Full Member

    195
    216
    Feb 14, 2023

    Which Exhibition did William Miller lose to Paddy Ryan? He has a few on record. Do you know month/year?
     
  7. Historical boxing society

    Historical boxing society Member Full Member

    195
    216
    Feb 14, 2023

    Yeah Miller would definitely the difference Miller & the trainer's they did daily sparring with student's. His ring hours are just so far surpassed those other's. Just because they don't have records data doesn't mean they aren't active. He was very durable we can see that from the Foley fight. Sure Sullivan had more power but either you can take punishment or you can't. Miller would have advantages in leverage all over the place with his knowledge he would almost guarantee be dropping Sullivan in close several times. They dealt with extremely powerful people in the wrestling grappling world. Real beefcakes even in 1870-80. It would be a better match than Paddy Ryan gave him. These guy's forearm's are like cobra's. Of course we would need Miller in great shape, but a big money fight he would be very ready I have no doubt. The betting would be close I do believe.

    The entire reason the American's struggled against the Aussie's was they DID NOT Spar daily. That is a not an issue with Miller. He was in the ring every week when he was in trainer mode. It's a titanic advantage.
     
    Last edited: Apr 15, 2026
  8. janitor

    janitor VIP Member

    71,965
    27,940
    Feb 15, 2006
    I would say that under the politics of the day, he wouldn't have been more than a claimant.

    Evan after he beat Ryan not everybody accepted his claim.
     
    Greg Price99 likes this.
  9. Melankomas

    Melankomas Corbett beats your favourite fighter

    8,258
    10,005
    Dec 18, 2022
  10. Historical boxing society

    Historical boxing society Member Full Member

    195
    216
    Feb 14, 2023
    That's unlike anything I ever read. Never heard anything like this. It would seem they would be blinded by the Lampblack.
    I'm not sure if they were affected in their vision. That's an odd fight.
    I think in a conventional London Prize ring fight it might result differently. I could see the wrestler coming out on the short end in hit's being scored method although it appeared fairly close. This isn't working to miller's strength...not having take downs. Ryan was size wise at least as heavy as him I would guess or very close.

    The reading is funny as the crowd was literally laughing at the ridiculous nature of the event. It had to blind them. It had too..
     
  11. Melankomas

    Melankomas Corbett beats your favourite fighter

    8,258
    10,005
    Dec 18, 2022
    Miller was certainly more proven than Ryan was, but keep in mind that Miller also beat Goss under the same circumstances;

    1878-12-20 The Sun (Baltimore, MD) (page 1)
    Boxing with Gloves--A Victory for Wm. Miller.-- "A sparring exhibition with blackened gloves, between William Miller, of Baltimore, and Joe Goss, of Boston, was given last night in Maryland Institute, to a very large audience, composed entirely of men. The rules of the match were that only face hits should count, and that each round should last three minutes, with as intermission of one minute between each round. Arthur Chambers, of Philadelphia, served as judge for Goss, John McGraw, of Baltimore city, for Miller, and James Randolph referee.

    Precisely at 8:30 P. M. the men appeared on the stage dressed in white tights and colored trunks. Both seemed equally matched, although Goss was a few pounds the heavier of the two, and seemed to have more fat than Miller, the muscles of whose arms and legs stood out like whipcord. Time being called, the combatants shook hands and faced each other in the centre of the stage. After a little cautious sparring on the part of both and as eager watching of each other's tactics, Miller led out with his left, but was quickly stopped by Goss. The latter then tried a right hander, but Miller countered, and with a swift upper cut from his left sent a blow right to Goss' cheek, driving him back to the painted canvas in the rear, thus scoring the first point. When the mark had been washed off, time was called. After some very pretty feints Goss led out and touched Miller, but before he could get away Miller followed him with a hard blow on the cheek.

    Again they moved around with caution, each seemingly determined that the other should have no advantage. With a quick left-hander Miller again got Goss on the cheek, but before he could spring back the latter returned it, thus ending the round, the score standing 3 to 2.
    In the next round Miller seemed to force the fighting, and Goss, getting on his mettle, sprung forward and countered on Miller's forehead, but Miller, with a rapid cut, struck back, and Goss's whole face showed the result of the blow. Goss now assumed the offensive, and delivered two blows in rapid succession, but the referee only allowed one point. Miller tried to lead Goss on with some shrewd feints, but Goss was wary and the round was ended. Goss again tried to lead Miller out, and the latter was not slow to gratify him. Watching his opportunity, Goss struck over Miller's guard, but Miller, lowering his head, caught the blow on his neck, and with a swift shoulder hit delivered one which left Goss as black as a chimney sweep. A few body blows were exchanged, and with a rapid counter and cross-counter both men were marked on the cheek. Blow for blow followed on the breast, and Goss was again touched on the forehead.
    In the fifth round the sparring was as scientific as a sportsman could desire. There was countering, quick return, and rattling blows, both men winning a point. Goss resumed his old tactics of drawing Miller off his guard, and with a rapid cut from his left struck him on the face, but Goss was not active enough, and before he could get away Miller returned the blow with interest.

    In the next bout Miller scored his point, and both he and Goss began to warm to their work. Round and round the stage, feinting, guarding and dodging, Miller was driven to a corner, and, with a swift shoulder hit, Goss scored his point.
    Equally as good science was shown in the succeeding round, Miller's agility and watchfulness being favorably commented upon. Close quarters were soon reached, and each one got a terrific left-hander. In the following bout the blows came equally as rapidly, but Miller's skill stood him well in stead, and saved him from several of Goss's well-directed blows. Goss was pushed to the corner and received a face blow, but paid it back. Goss now began to crowd Miller, and after a quick feint let out from the left shoulder, and Miller dodged like a cat, but not quickly enough, for Goss, shifting to his right, scored with a clean upper cut."

    Sullivan, on the other hand, beat Goss under more traditional Queensbury gloved rules. I'd say he has a better claim than Miller does though it's not like Miller has no claim altogether.
     
  12. Historical boxing society

    Historical boxing society Member Full Member

    195
    216
    Feb 14, 2023
    I would agree with you. Certainly Sullivan would have a better claim. Miller wasn't Aussie champ yet so he had really no lineage.

    You have any idea how far back this form of "black glove" "lampblack" Fighting goes back? They must not of had bareknuckle guy's fighting like this...

    This is the very first I ever heard of it. It kind reminds me of table tennis or some type of sport where you score a hit...I wonder how exciting it was too watch. It's interesting.. maybe fencing would be a more accurate sport similar to getting hits

    Great reads I like it. Talk about outside the box thinking. This is really crazy.
     
    Last edited: Apr 15, 2026
  13. Melankomas

    Melankomas Corbett beats your favourite fighter

    8,258
    10,005
    Dec 18, 2022
    No idea, you’d have to ask rhe premier historians on the era like @apollack, @Senya13, @SimonLock.

    I wouldn’t mind seeing these come back honestly, I’ve already seen people on YouTube try recreating London prize ring rule fights and there’s already a lot of gimmicky fights in boxing already like Jake Paul so why not? Seems like people enjoying seeing it judging by those descriptions.
     
  14. Senya13

    Senya13 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,041
    2,512
    Jul 11, 2005
    The whole thing about Sullivan being the world champion instead of the American champion only lies in absence of other countries' gloved/MoQ champions until several years later, just as Adam says. You can find dozens of write-ups by sporting writers afterwards, argueing that he was American champion only, but none of them names anyone Sullivan had to beat during first half of 1880s to claim world championship. It wasn't until the second half of the decade when claims of champinship of England or Australia were established.

    When exactly was Sullivan's claim to American, and thus World championship established, it's hard to say.
     
    apollack likes this.
  15. Melankomas

    Melankomas Corbett beats your favourite fighter

    8,258
    10,005
    Dec 18, 2022
    It seems, to me, like the only other claim out there could've been laid by Miller? I read an article of him officially challenging Sullivan at some point, and after he beat Foley was there any other Australian title claimant out there?