Fury Vs Wilder 1; draw or Fury's win; what is fairer?

The judge makes it a robbery.

But, personally, closer fight than people give it credit for.

 

Fury won, but its true that another ref might have counted him out, so it balances out to me to where I don't lose sleep. It created a controversy that gave us some entertaining rematches and earned both men a lot of money. I've moved on.

 

Fury has beaten Wilder three different ways, the first fight you can make a case for a draw with the knockdowns but the evidence indicates there's a very strong case for a Fury win. Second fight he got absolutely demolished and the third fight was one of the most brutal contests you can witness for a while then he gets gradually eroded into the canvas. Wilder couldn't finish the job, even that resurrection round Fury was winning the rest of it somehow. He has incredible powers of recovery.

 

Been a while since I watched the fight, but as somebody who was picking Fury to win going into it, I didn't have a problem with the draw. Thought Fury wasn't doing enough offensively a lot of the time. He'd make Wilder miss but rarely ever make him pay, so Wilder kept getting points for being the aggressor. Still though, if anybody won the fight it was Fury, but a draw was a reasonable result to me.

 

There's no way anyone with a brain could have had Wilder winning that fight.

 

any round that Wilder didn't get a knock down,he lost so you do the math

 

Normal math or DEI math?

 

The judge that had Wilder is either directly involved with DNC or NAACP or is as corrupt as Adelaide Byrd