Marciano would’ve crushed Usyk

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by ivancho, May 23, 2026.


  1. chaunceygardina

    chaunceygardina Member Full Member

    415
    487
    Sep 3, 2023
    The Fury, from both their fights would have beaten this Usyk
     
  2. Knight Falls

    Knight Falls New Member Full Member

    32
    45
    Apr 18, 2026
    No he wouldn’t have. Marciano would be a light heavyweight today. He is not 260lbs of pure muscle like Rico.
     
  3. janitor

    janitor VIP Member

    71,960
    27,928
    Feb 15, 2006
    Anyway, on to the original question, which is not a new one for this forum.

    You have probably noticed that I am reluctant to give props to active fighters, because they can always let you down.

    I gave plenty of props to Usyk, and he seems to have punished me for it.

    Anyway, I have always maintained that one kind of fighter who woudl have a good chance against him, woudl be a swarmer.

    A Marciano, or a Frazier, or even a Bert Cooper.
     
  4. Gazelle Punch

    Gazelle Punch Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,454
    9,277
    Aug 15, 2018
    I tend to agree with this. But once a fighter is out of prime (which Usyk has been for a few years) it’s safe to judge them. Usyk is an ATG and top 5 h2h imo. The only question mark on his record is he never fought an elite swarmer type. This version of Usyk seemed half the guy that fought AJ. No pep in his step at all.
     
    swagdelfadeel and BCS8 like this.
  5. thistle

    thistle Boxing Junkie

    8,329
    8,916
    Dec 21, 2016
    he's not an ATG top 5, even accounting for achievements it is still ridiculous, there are many more ahead of him.

    anyway, once again I'll go with my disdain for lists as to both the near impossibility to be all inclusive, all facts considered and equal analyses that always fail Boxing History as to Good & Great fighters h2h, which is the only true analyses.

    so that said, loads of good & great HW's over 150 years could beat him.

    atg top this or top that is madness, Usyk from what I've see lands among the many, many good top noted fighters, not equal to the very top performers... which also has to be understood is not a bad thing, it is in fact a great placement, because Boxing has produced 1000s of great fighters over the years, 1000s.
     
    robert ungurean likes this.
  6. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member

    98,340
    30,124
    Jun 2, 2006
    Great is a very overused adjective imo.
     
    Seamus and Reinhardt like this.
  7. Reinhardt

    Reinhardt Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,496
    19,983
    Oct 4, 2016
    I drew my conclusions on Usyk a long time ago, a very good boxer who came along at the perfect time when the division is at an historic low.
     
  8. Reinhardt

    Reinhardt Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,496
    19,983
    Oct 4, 2016
    Hmm? I agree with your comment about the swarmer and the name Bert Cooper gave me pause. If the Cooper that almost ko'ed Holyfield catches him that could be a better than imagined fight. I certainly like Bert's chances against Usyk better than against Holyfield.
     
  9. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    55,006
    48,997
    Apr 27, 2005
  10. InMemoryofJakeLamotta

    InMemoryofJakeLamotta I have defeated the great Seamus Full Member

    17,339
    12,749
    Sep 21, 2017
    Where do you get those wonderful toys
     
  11. Marvelous_Iron

    Marvelous_Iron Active Member Full Member

    1,284
    1,652
    Jul 9, 2022
    All 3? The overrated eastern blocker, the kickboxer, and the midget lol

    Originally I was going to say Usyk has never had the stamina to go 15 rounds with a body puncher but decided to interject "forum Lyle" instead
     
    JohnThomas1 likes this.
  12. MaccaveliMacc

    MaccaveliMacc Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,529
    9,565
    Feb 27, 2024
    Historic low? So 1900's, 1910's, 1920's, 1930's, 1940's and 1950's were in your opinion better?
     
  13. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    65,698
    52,772
    Feb 11, 2005
    This is laughable in a discussion including Marciano. I'd pick damn near anyone in today's top ten to run the table with any of the heavies from 1950 up until Liston.
     
    MaccaveliMacc and White Bomber like this.
  14. Dynamicpuncher

    Dynamicpuncher Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,460
    37,556
    Jan 14, 2022
    But that's an unfair comparison because this is the era of Super Heavyweights.

    Most Heavyweights in Marciano's era were under 200 pounds.

    Yes they'd probably win on size alone but it doesn't they're better fighters.

    The bigger question is would you have the top 10 Cruiserweights of this era to run the table against the top 10 Heavyweights of the 1950s ?

    Because that's a more fair and realistic comparison in regards to size.
     
  15. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    65,698
    52,772
    Feb 11, 2005
    This is a head-to-head conversation so I must compare them thusly.