Usyk has lost 50 of his 217 career rounds

He has 25 fights, based on this slow stsrt and opponent exploring - even if he lost the first two rounds against all 25 opponents, that will make your 50 rounds calculation. What are you trying to prove?

 

Guys always won and thats basically all that matters

 

I mean it's an interesting pure statistic but I'm not sure what you're trying to extrapolate from this? There are more contextual factors to 'greatness' than just rounds won / lost, especially since in the microcosm of individual bouts Usyk is usually winning 9-3 or 8-4 which would be considered decisive. That's not even mentioning obvious judging bias in some of his bouts (the scoring in AJ 2 being laughably bias for AJ, for example - that bout was not actually that close).

Then there's the H2H factor where this doesn't really apply at all. Styles make fights. I love classic fighters but I can freely admit that Usyk is a nightmare style match up for a lot of classic heavies H2H.

 

Strong rumours now he's going to fight Irwin Gossamer next.

 

Cope.

 

TKO11

 

He beats all the nostalgia Murican heavyweights and that's all that matters. Because those are the 'gold standard' and laughably so.
He's 39 and all those characters were CTE-d and garbage at that age, long before really.
But Frazier of course beats all these giants now and featherfist Ali is definitely backing them all off and wearing them out with his rope-a-dope, when he's not getting brain damage from his incredible defence. Big George can tower over them with his 6'3 massiveness, plod forward and uppercut them to the canvas. Who could possibly deal with these forces of nature?

 

Usyk should have won by unanimous decision against Joshua II and Fury I.

 

Foreman is not even 2 cm smaller than Dubois according to celebheights

 

So that would put his average rounds won across 12 rounds at 9.24 vs 2.76 for his opponent. That's extremely dominant.