Could Duran have held his own in the 80s?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Mark Dunham, Jun 10, 2026.


  1. Mark Dunham

    Mark Dunham Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,883
    1,024
    Mar 19, 2021
    bears no resemblance at 160 compared with 130

    prime Camacho would make him look worse than Sugar ray Leonard
     
  2. Man_Machine

    Man_Machine Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,954
    10,414
    Jun 9, 2010
    The best version of Camacho didn't set a performance ceiling high enough to accommodate the best version of Duran.
     
    Fireman Fred and Greg Price99 like this.
  3. Mike Cannon

    Mike Cannon Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,707
    8,813
    Apr 29, 2020
    Hi Guys.
    There is no era that Duran couldn't hold his own in, and if it's at 135, which it should be, then only B. Leonard would give him his sternest test.
    Mike.
     
    Man_Machine likes this.
  4. JackSilver

    JackSilver Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,815
    5,511
    Jun 24, 2017
    Maybe but then who did Duran beat at lightweight that the macho man wouldn’t or couldn’t have beaten as well?
     
  5. Greg Price99

    Greg Price99 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,862
    11,817
    Dec 17, 2018
    Buchanan and De Jesus would be tough fights for Camacho over 15-rounds.
     
    ETM, zadfrak, Mike Cannon and 2 others like this.
  6. Man_Machine

    Man_Machine Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,954
    10,414
    Jun 9, 2010
    We can speculate that Camacho could beat all of Duran's opposition (I doubt he would), and even then, he still might not match Duran's level of performance.

    Camacho arguably peaked in his outings against Ramirez and Rosario. One was a takedown; the other saw him having to pull out all the stops. Neither opponent was on the level of Esteban De Jesus or Ken Buchanan.

    Camacho would move up a division just a couple of fights later, and so there is essentially nothing that came after that good year ('85/'86) that is comparable.
     
    Greg Price99 likes this.
  7. Flash24

    Flash24 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,755
    10,127
    Oct 22, 2015
    Duràn would be just as dominate at lightweight in the 80's with his hardest challenges being Pryor, Arguello, Camacho Sr, and Chavez, however I would like him against all four , especially Camacho.
    He'd be more dominate at welterweight no Leonard, Hearns or Benitez,
    He'd probably not win a version of the Jr. Middleweight championship with Kalambay, Watson, McCallum, Watson, Hearns, and Norris at his best. Unless Norris fights undisciplined, which he did have a tendency of doing.
     
    Man_Machine and Mike Cannon like this.
  8. TipNom

    TipNom Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,703
    3,575
    Jun 19, 2019
    I think he may come out as top dog of the era still, but I highly doubt he dominates in the same way he did in the 70s. Might pick up more than just the one loss along the way.
     
  9. Mark Dunham

    Mark Dunham Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,883
    1,024
    Mar 19, 2021
    I'm sorry but I just dont see it. I like Duran against the Harry Arroyos of the world but a Chavez or Frankie Randall would be demanding fights and quite honestly, I think they would be quite challenging

    Camacho of course, with his vastly superior foot speed and technique, would always be a step ahead en route to a close but clear UD

    Duran might not even beat Whitaker. Newly crowned Whitaker yes, but not the more experienced Pernell
     
  10. JackSilver

    JackSilver Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,815
    5,511
    Jun 24, 2017
    just curious but which lightweight that Duran fought do you doubt macho camacho could beat?

    I aint doubting Durans abilities. he was clearly the best 70s lightweight by far but the way some people rave about what he did as a lightweight you swear it was some damn lightweight murderers row that he was up against back then
     
    Mark Dunham likes this.
  11. Mark Dunham

    Mark Dunham Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,883
    1,024
    Mar 19, 2021
    to be honest, the lightweights of the 1970s was very average, at best. no speedsters, no dangerous punchers. No Benny Leonards, nothing like that. Good set of skills but far, far below that of a hector Camacho
     
  12. Cobra33

    Cobra33 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,902
    15,165
    Feb 2, 2006
    It doesn't "even" out when a boxer loses his ability to take a punch that's it and Leonard lost that ability.
     
  13. Mark Dunham

    Mark Dunham Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,883
    1,024
    Mar 19, 2021
    Its not that he LOST the ability to take it; it's that he never had it to begin with. Did you not see the Kevin Howard fight???

    Don lalonde?

    He won those fights but the difference was, neither Kevin or Donny would fight. Camacho could
     
  14. Cobra33

    Cobra33 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,902
    15,165
    Feb 2, 2006
    You cannot be that foolish. He took murderous shots from THOMAS HEARNS, DUDAN and Hagler.
    When your body has had enough it will quit on you rather you like it or not.
    And the older you get the less punishment you are able to take.
     
    Greg Price99 likes this.
  15. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    55,065
    49,150
    Apr 27, 2005
    Just like the old days red!!! Look at you go.
     
    Greg Price99 likes this.