Could Duran have held his own in the 80s?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Mark Dunham, Jun 10, 2026.


  1. Man_Machine

    Man_Machine Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,954
    10,414
    Jun 9, 2010
    So, that's who it is... ... ... ... ... :ohno
     
    Greg Price99, Flash24 and JohnThomas1 like this.
  2. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    55,090
    49,232
    Apr 27, 2005
    Well at least we have top shelf trolls again, that's definitely an uptick! He's been on a real roll already.
     
    Greg Price99 and Man_Machine like this.
  3. Flash24

    Flash24 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,756
    10,130
    Oct 22, 2015
    Yes, he is that FOOLISH....
     
  4. Man_Machine

    Man_Machine Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,954
    10,414
    Jun 9, 2010
    Yeah - the trolling department has seen a low ebb of late. The abstract Leonard-hating is a much higher class of bait LOL
     
    Greg Price99 and JohnThomas1 like this.
  5. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    55,090
    49,232
    Apr 27, 2005
    And that's been broadened to different horizons now. Floyd/Duran sure got everyone in :lol:

    You have to love a bit of nostalgia hahaha
     
    Man_Machine and Greg Price99 like this.
  6. Man_Machine

    Man_Machine Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,954
    10,414
    Jun 9, 2010
    I can't believe I didn't see it.

    Reference to the 'Kevin Howard' fight should have been THE clue. Hahahaha
     
    JohnThomas1 likes this.
  7. Dorrian_Grey

    Dorrian_Grey It came to me in a dream Full Member

    3,350
    6,034
    Apr 20, 2024
    I'm not sure I'd pick Duran over Chavez tbh. Whittaker is a stylistic nightmare imo, especially depending on what age we're plopping Duran into the 80s. Camacho I don't think would beat Duran. I just don't see it, regardless of how flashy and athletic he was, I was never especially convinced of Camacho's ability in all honesty. Rosario gets mauled by Duran. Jose Luis Ramirez would be a fun fight but I don't think there's much a doubt over Duran winning. Frankie Randall is an interesting proposition for Duran and a dangerous banana peel for him imo. Arguello would also be a serious proposition for Duran to deal with, especially considering how a similarly twiggy power-puncher in Hearns wrecked Duran. He'd do well for himself, no doubt, but I don't think he'd be anywhere near as dominant as he was in the 70s.
     
    Jel likes this.
  8. Jel

    Jel Obsessive list maker Full Member

    8,034
    13,700
    Oct 20, 2017
    If Duran worked his way unbeaten through Arguello, Rosario, Camacho, Chavez and Whitaker whilst holding 2 or 3 of the belts then he’d have a better lightweight resumé than he actually did and, as it stands, he places at worst 3rd on most good all-time lightweight lists.
     
    Greg Price99 and JohnThomas1 like this.
  9. PRW94

    PRW94 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,323
    4,068
    Nov 26, 2020
    Yes. More words would be extraneous.
     
  10. ETM

    ETM I thought I did enough to win. Full Member

    13,686
    12,351
    Mar 19, 2012
    Duran's right hand lead would alter Hector. It was quick, laser accuracy how many could Camacho absorb before survival mode kicks in? Then you have Duran's defense, coming forward relentless yet slippery. Hector is in for a rough nite. Maybe a short nite.
     
    Greg Price99 likes this.
  11. clum

    clum Member Full Member

    444
    813
    Jan 4, 2017
    Duran did hold his own in the '80s. He more than held his own. He won three world titles, at welter, junior middle, and middle.

    I'll venture to guess that if he's ten years younger and fighting at his natural weight, his record and accomplishments aren't going to be any less than what the actual '80s Duran accomplished when he was outsized pretty much every time out.
     
    Last edited: Jun 16, 2026
    Greg Price99 likes this.