Why did young George Foreman look so big even at relatively low listed weights?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by MixedMartialLaw, Jun 21, 2026.


  1. Ioakeim Tzortzakis

    Ioakeim Tzortzakis "The David Haye of Loma's Gay" -Edgar Allan Poe Full Member

    2,045
    7,180
    Aug 27, 2020
    I mean, go check the rankings. He was #9, that's the reality.
     
    Greg Price99 likes this.
  2. Cojimar 1946

    Cojimar 1946 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,508
    2,184
    Nov 23, 2014
    Here's all the guys that keep him out of the top 10
    Ali
    Foreman
    Frazier
    Norton
    Bonavena
    Lyle
    Quarry
    Shavers
    Bugner
    Clark
    Middleton
    etc, etc.

    There were easily more than 8 guys better than him, probably 15 plus
     
  3. Ioakeim Tzortzakis

    Ioakeim Tzortzakis "The David Haye of Loma's Gay" -Edgar Allan Poe Full Member

    2,045
    7,180
    Aug 27, 2020
    You weren't the one who made the August 1973 rankings though, so who cares ?
     
  4. Cojimar 1946

    Cojimar 1946 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,508
    2,184
    Nov 23, 2014
    Good thing I'm smarter than the guys that did the ratings then I guess.

    Any sane person can look at the division and see there are more than 10 guys better than Roman

    Like Pedro Agosto. Who was somehow unranked despite beating Roman
     
  5. MaccaveliMacc

    MaccaveliMacc Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,572
    9,615
    Feb 27, 2024
    No worries, I forgot about Roman being ranked too.
     
  6. MaccaveliMacc

    MaccaveliMacc Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,572
    9,615
    Feb 27, 2024
    Similar case to Otto Wallin being in the Top 10 in 2023.
     
  7. Cojimar 1946

    Cojimar 1946 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,508
    2,184
    Nov 23, 2014
    I think Otto has a stronger case because his only loss prior was Fury. Going into the fight one could reasonably think he might be top 10.

    Roman on the other hand has some really bad losses prior like Agosto and multiple guys I'd never heard of previously.
     
  8. MaccaveliMacc

    MaccaveliMacc Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,572
    9,615
    Feb 27, 2024
    "Shows how weak the division was" hehehe.
     
    Greg Price99 likes this.
  9. Philosopher

    Philosopher Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,932
    3,073
    Aug 10, 2024
    Because George Foreman is an unweighable mass that appears in human form only to blow his cover with superhuman strength and power. Hulk smash/its clobberin' time and the myth of Hercules were all based on historical tales of 'big' George. He is still expanding and weighing more becoming ever more dense after leaving his human form, his mass is all pervasive and has an omnipotent quality that is both reassuring yet strangely unnerving. It is only because George posseses such a gentle soul that his unfathomable power and size is not a danger to our very existence, an existential threat that would commit a catastrophic coup de grace out of spite and mercy on an unsuspecting, inward looking self obsessed humanity if such power was held by a lesser being. George is mass x weight x power x infinity and he always will be. God bless our saviour.
     
  10. InMemoryofJakeLamotta

    InMemoryofJakeLamotta I have defeated the great Seamus Full Member

    17,368
    12,776
    Sep 21, 2017
    You’re 78??? I feel like the baby of the forum
     
    Smoochie and MixedMartialLaw like this.
  11. MickyG

    MickyG New Member Full Member

    21
    29
    Sep 22, 2025
    Foreman's size was deceptive but he was also 6'3/6'4 depending on who you believe. He actually made Gerry Cooney look frail when they fought each other.
     
  12. SwarmingSlugger

    SwarmingSlugger Active Member Full Member

    1,349
    1,663
    Nov 27, 2010
    Studs? The final piece of the puzzle.
     
    Greg Price99 likes this.