Regardless of the identity of the "perpetrator", that would be a highly irregular way to respond to that question.
Yes. I didn't mean literally. I meant someone in Lennox' position, who was been brought through the usual route of: British-European-World. If you look at who he was fighting back in the early 90's, a fight against Mike would have been unthinkable at that stage. He didn't fight Frank Bruno until 1993.
Your supposed masturbation comment was sarcasm, but the fact that you took it seriously speaks volumes about your understanding of the post—as well as your other tendencies Have a nice day, Janek.
I agree with you, many fights should have been made. But you can also say that about the 70s and other eras, that wasn't my point. My point was the HWs of the 90s were better, thus the era was better.
You are casting shade on my comprehension skills while not even realising i was talking about me supposedly carrying on about Douglas "when asked about Tyson from the Spinks fight"?? Do you have me mixed up with someone else? I'm not recalling any such event (minus the masturbation if you still don't understand)? Have a nice day, Dad.
Well, your personal attacks against me show that you lack arguments in any discussion, and that really frustrates you That’s not the way to go, buddy Once your emotions subside, you’ll see for yourself how pathetic it sounds. But you won’t drag me into a name-calling match from behind a monitor, keyboard warrior. I know I’d lose Have a wonderful day—and try to stay calm.
Lets go back to the start. You said the below to me - Come on, when asked about Tyson from the Spinki fight, you started masturbating over the Douglas fight. I want you to show me where this happened? You have stated it happened. I want to know where. I've seen so many claims of things being said in these forums that have never been said. Also, don't talk insults when you hit me with the masturbation rubbish/tripe/rot/vulgarness bud.
The term for masturbation isn't a vulgarity. If I touched a nerve, I apologize Prove any lie I’ve written on this forum—it should be easy, given there are so many of them. John, honestly, talking to you is somewhat amusing, but you clearly let your emotions get the better of you—so it’s probably too stressful for you—and besides, there’s no substance to the conversation. I don’t know how it is that I can discuss boxing with some people and it’s fine even if we disagree, while others fly into a hysterical rage and resort to personal attacks. P.S. If you didn't actually do the thing that upset you so much—regarding the topic I wrote about—then I might have mistaken you for some other idiot. I know why, and you can probably figure it out too. Cheers
Thinking i am emotional, hysterical, upset or stressed posting to you on a boxing forum sums things up to a tee See you at the next Tyson - Douglas riot.