Michael Spinks Vs. George Foreman 1987/88

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by ikrasevic, Jun 27, 2026.


  1. ikrasevic

    ikrasevic War for Souls Full Member

    9,395
    9,853
    Nov 3, 2021
    What would this fight look like, if it were to happen?
     
  2. Rock0052

    Rock0052 Loyal Member Full Member

    34,251
    5,946
    Apr 30, 2006
    Timeline just doesn't line up right for me to favor George here vs a pre-Tyson Spinks. There's a world of difference between knocking rust off vs Tim Anderson and Mike. Gimme Spinks on points.
     
  3. Mark Dunham

    Mark Dunham Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,964
    1,045
    Mar 19, 2021
    Spinks, as much as I disliked him, is more than good enough to outpoint George who is just way to slow to connect.
     
    BCS8 and ikrasevic like this.
  4. HistoryZero26

    HistoryZero26 Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,262
    6,324
    Jan 6, 2024
    Foreman would win because Michael Spinks is just a gift to Foremans fist but two things to weigh

    A)Physically Foreman wasn't that far from what would have been his prime.

    B)Foreman had been gone for 10 years which heavily mitigates the relevance of point A.
     
  5. ikrasevic

    ikrasevic War for Souls Full Member

    9,395
    9,853
    Nov 3, 2021
    If Foreman were in Tyson's place - he would have knocked out Spinks with "knees" in 12 rounds; Spinks would not have won on points. Foreman was already in the game enough.
     
    HistoryZero26 likes this.
  6. HistoryZero26

    HistoryZero26 Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,262
    6,324
    Jan 6, 2024

    Another factor is Spinks would have underestimated George and seen the fight as a joke. Foreman who didn't fight in 10 years with no impressive comeback tape? Spinks is kinda being set up here.
     
    Glass City Cobra likes this.
  7. ikrasevic

    ikrasevic War for Souls Full Member

    9,395
    9,853
    Nov 3, 2021
    Spinks saw what happened to Qavi, and he fought him.
    Foreman Ko.
    The Foreman vs Carlos Hernández fight is at the time of Tyson vs Spinks. Also regardless - Spinks didn't prepare well for Tyson either, but it would have taken longer with Foreman.
     
  8. HistoryZero26

    HistoryZero26 Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,262
    6,324
    Jan 6, 2024
    Isn't your scenario based on the idea he wouldn't see what happened to Qawi?

    Anyone would have taken longer then Tyson including Tyson if they fought a different night because speed runs aren't really planned they either happen or they don't.
     
  9. SouthpawsRule

    SouthpawsRule Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    1,544
    1,974
    Jul 2, 2025
    It would be Foreman's first match after a decade and obesity so Spinks by 12-0 decision.
     
    Greg Price99 likes this.
  10. ikrasevic

    ikrasevic War for Souls Full Member

    9,395
    9,853
    Nov 3, 2021
    If the fight was in 1987, he wouldn't have seen it, if it was when Tyson fought, or at the end of 1988 - he would have seen it.
     
    HistoryZero26 likes this.
  11. ikrasevic

    ikrasevic War for Souls Full Member

    9,395
    9,853
    Nov 3, 2021
    it depends if the fight is in early 1987 (I agree) or late 1988. If Foreman had replaced Tyson, the outcome would have been the same - KO.
     
  12. SouthpawsRule

    SouthpawsRule Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    1,544
    1,974
    Jul 2, 2025
    I don't think there is much difference between the two versions honestly, Tyson was just universes above a drunk Cooney.
     
  13. MarkusFlorez99

    MarkusFlorez99 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,384
    19,369
    Jan 13, 2021
    50/50 imo George wasn't as declined as the mid 90s but I'd slightly lean Spinks
     
  14. Shay Sonya

    Shay Sonya The REAL Wonder Woman! Full Member

    4,127
    10,166
    Aug 15, 2021
    Hello, ikrasevic.

    I think, at that point (late 1987?) Spinks could have won quite a few rounds on activity and movement, together with some sharp right hands that could get George's attention but not really hurt him badly. Foreman could win rounds with hard body work to slow Spinks down, using his power jab for positioning, and his hard right hand and left hook (that could get more than Michael's attention).

    I see Spinks ahead on the cards, but not as widely as some would think, going into about round 9. After round 8 I see Spinks slowing ever so slightly, inspiring George to speed up some and throw more heavy shots. George Foreman's power was terrifying at any age and, by this time, Spinks realizes that fact. At this point in the fight I think George catches Spinks with something that knocks him down hard, possibly once or even twice. The fight could end between the 9th and 11th round or Spinks might survive and go into a modified box and survive mode after a very bad round for him. So, if it's stopped, or Michael fails to rise from a knockdown, Foreman wins by TKO or KO between rounds 9 and 11.

    If Spinks survives, the fight goes on, but George might be somewhat gassed at this point, and will likely be suffering from some rather severe swelling on his face. So after 12, I will go with George Foreman by a very close decision win, upsetting the betting line on the outcome, as well as many boxing people who never even considered that a possibility. Stranger things have happened in my favorite sport.

    If forced to pick one outcome, I would go with George Foreman by a stoppage between rounds 9 and 11.
     
    Fergy and ikrasevic like this.
  15. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    66,967
    88,017
    Aug 21, 2012
    This. Spinks was levels faster than the old geezer and more skilful. I mean, I guess it isn't impossible that Foreman catches him and finishes him at some point, but if Spinks boxes clever and avoids trying to be macho, he ought to take a decision comfortably.
     
    Fergy likes this.