How do you feel about Toney vs McCallum II's decision?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by FThabxinfan, Jan 1, 2025.


?

  1. Boo! McCallum robbed!

    3 vote(s)
    14.3%
  2. Toney won this one fair,wdym?

    8 vote(s)
    38.1%
  3. Very close,a draw.

    5 vote(s)
    23.8%
  4. I got McCallum winning but it's close,no robbery.

    5 vote(s)
    23.8%
  1. Flo_Raiden

    Flo_Raiden Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,811
    34,952
    Oct 12, 2010
    After having watched all 3 fights in a row I personally think Toney looked his absolute best against McCallum in their first fight. Not only did he land more big power shots often he had hurt McCallum more times, even close to dropping him at one point. Second fight Toney seemed to allow McCallum to consistently pepper him with jabs, dictate the pace, and outwork him while he would constantly wait for counter opportunities and then fight in spurts. Third fight Toney won without a doubt but McCallum’s age also played a factor. It wasn’t Toney’s strongest performance quite honestly but this was the fight where he won the most rounds due to activity and he did more than enough to secure a win against the 40 year old veteran.
     
    Last edited: Jul 1, 2026
  2. robert ungurean

    robert ungurean Богдан Philadelphia Full Member

    17,126
    16,868
    Jun 9, 2007
    Agree 100% Real old school master mechanics. The level of skill on display here is of the absolute highest caliber
     
  3. THE BLADE 2

    THE BLADE 2 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,911
    4,660
    Jul 14, 2009
    I had the same score. Toney landed the more eye catching shots. Mc Callum was busier but his punches had no power in this fight.
     
  4. clum

    clum Member Full Member

    444
    813
    Jan 4, 2017
    Basically how I saw it. McCallum just pecked and pecked. His punches had nothing on them. Toney fought only sixty seconds a round and still probably did more damage.

    I've never really been able to get worked up about this fight either way. Who cares about the deserving winner when both performances were so uninspiring? McCallum looked like he had nothing left but his brains (which makes his LHW comeback win against Harding even more impressive), and Toney had one of the low-effort outings he became notorious for. A fight can be great even if neither participant is at their best, but this one had none of the intensity of their first bout, which is rightly remembered as a classic.

    Reactions to this fight at the time were disappointed. Not really sure what's brought on the revisionism that it's some kind of technical masterpiece. Watch McCallum-Kalambay II instead.
     
    Last edited: Jul 2, 2026
    JohnThomas1 likes this.
  5. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    55,043
    49,094
    Apr 27, 2005
    I nipped it for McCallum. The poll shows 8 apiece which sows it was a reasonably close fight which could have gone either way according to the scorers preference.
     
    Greg Price99 likes this.