But it's true, so... I mean, don't **** on the man's leg and tell him its raining. He knows he can't get the good fights.
So why can’t he fight Suslenkov who’s on the undercard? Wouldn’t be the greatest opponent, but far better than Kadiru. And what kind of offers did Hrgovic and Miller reject to face Gassiev? The only thing that comes up when I look it up is Gassiev himself rejecting the fight Hrgovic for the IBF eliminator a few years back. Not when there’s a better opponent on the very same card. People are entitled to be happy or unhappy about it and It’s not anyone’s business unless they’re Gassiev’s manager, wife or mother. Again, why can’t he fight Suslenkov, who’s not the best but far better than Kadiru and fighting on the very same card? And when did Hrgovic not want to know about a fight with Gassiev? Just as Charles Martin understood the IBF rules better than rest of the boxing world, yet he was trashed as a papel titlist. Stiverne understood the rules of WBC better than the rest of the boxing world, and he was ridiculed as a paper titlist and he had far more legitimacy as a HW titlist than Gassiev. Okay, Itauma swerwed Gassiev to fight Hrgovic. There are still over 50 HWs that are better than Kadiru, and one of them is fighting on the very same card. Hmm. Wilder got 1000x the ridicule that Gassiev is getting even when he first won the title. And he was far, far, far, more of a legitimate titlist. Was that the reason, because he was smarter than them? Yes. The win over 45 year old, borderline top30 Pulev who hadn’t beaten a legit HW contender over half a decade is Gassiev’s only accomplishment at heavyweight which only reiterates how ridicuolus It is that he’s holding a title. It’s extremely relevant when Wallin is the only Gassiev opponent with a pulse at HW and the decisive loss demonstrates his level as a heavyweight. It could not be more relevant. Just like Charles Martin and Bermane Stiverne did. The only thing that’s silly is being emotionally attached to these guys to the extent of getting personal about the criticism they’re receiving. He has the opportunity, meaning he hasn’t done anything yet. Fighters get judged by what they have done, not by what they haven’t. The only possible comparison point is when they first won their HW title. So at that particular point, Stiverne>>>Gassiev. He demonstrated the ability to be a unified champion in a different weight class almost a decade ago. The only thing he demonstrated at HW is being better than 45 year old Pulev and worse than Wallin. He has a better legacy than those guys for his work at cruiserweight, again, a different weight class almost a decade ago which have nothing to do with his standing at HW. The only thing that’s sad is making this personal. Bringing up sparring stories is usually an indication on how poor the fighter’s body of work is. Again, this is exclusive to his work at HW. But yes, I thought Gassiev was one of the hardest punchers in the game after his KO of Dorticos. It’s a very good card as I mentioned in my previous post, would be better than good if it was Suslenkov replacing Yoka. All that being said, if Gassiev goes on to defend his belt against the winner of Hrgovic/Itauma succesfully, he’ll definetly be a legitimate titlist better than Stiverne and definetly better than Charles Martin. Maybe even better than Haye. But that’s a huge if.
We don't know that Suslenkov wanted it. Perhaps Suslenkov didn't fancy it on a week's notice. But Murat, who tried to get the best in the division, is hardly afraid of Suslenkov. Let's be real. Again, I don't have privy to back dealings, but they publicly offered the fight to a short list that they were on. But we don't know who was willing to take them on a week's notice. You are making assumptions. According to Rummy, Joyce was declined by the WBA. Again, we don't know that Suslenkov wanted it. Charles Martin had nothing to do with this. By the way, he won his title against undefeated Glazkov fair and square, and then defended against AJ--the best out there. The man is no world beater but he deserves credit too. He did nothing wrong except not live up to your standards. BINGOI! You have stumbled blindly into the truth. The chosen one turned down a free belt against this shot little cruiser. It was the shot little cruiser who wanted the smoke. And yet you think Murat is ducking Suslenkov, who, let's be fair to him, is pretty ordinary. Sure thing. And we know the one they wanted was rejected by the WBA accroding to Rummy. We don't know if any of the others were willing to do it on a week's notice. Actually, he didn't. A lot of people ate crow on that. His subsequent reign was a disgrace. But there was the issue of Stiverne having a disease partially caused by obesity, if that is what you are talking about. I'd of picked 44 year old Puelv to beat that fat slug, who has lost to Demetrice King. So there is that. But you know he was top 30. That why you keep adding new qualifyers. A fighter can loose a fight and rebound from it. And you have admitted twice that Pulev is top 30, so no, not the only fighter with a pulse. Martin and Stiverne were their own things. The issue here is that Gassiev has worked nobly to rebuild his own career, and a lot of people are impugning his integrity, when the fault lies with those who won't fight him. Countless very good East Euro and Central Asian fighters have their career stuck in neutral while Brits and Americans get chance after chance. You are telling me that Murat is the worst champ? He went 12 with Usyk. Lost round after round and just kept fighting. Dubois failed to do that TWICE. Yet Murat had to make his path, where Dubois kept being giftwrapped shots failure after failure. Seriously, shame to anyone who is not getting behind Murat, here. Your outrage should be against the system that discriminates against him. Yes, he hasn't failed yet. So your comparisons to failures are non-sequitur. Gassiev has more legacy in this sport than Stiverne, Martin, and Itauma to date put together. Which is a great accomplishment, and it is awesome that despite injuries and the discrimination that eastern European fighters face, he has put himself in position to add to that legacy. Sparring stories FROM THE GUY HE SPARRED WITH. Nice trying to change things around to make this a MArtin Bakole situation, but this is talking about the guy you tried to big up talking about how Gassiev is the hardest he has been hit. Gift-horse's mouth. But we don't know of he wanted it on short notice. That is an assumption. Third time. But he has put himself in the position to do it, and that is why he has earned the respect. Those crying about him are ultimate keyboard warriors.
I don't think there's even a single Russian that bigs up Gassiev like @catchwtboxing Fair play for the consistency but on paper he is a terrible HW and one is imagine the WBA hope sells his title real soon
Hey you never know, could end up being a good champion But as of now it's a bit of a come down for the WBA having a HW champion without a single good win in his HW career
He did what had to do. The rest didn't. And he was publicly swerved by Ituama and the others when he offered a shot. So as far as I am concerned, until someone steps up and takes it from him, he's the legit champ.
We know for a fact that Joyce was offered the shot. If Suslenkov was offered also, we definetly would’ve heard about it. I thought Suslenkov as flawed as he is was a legit threat to Gassiev, Gassiev’s team probably felt the same way. And preferred an easier one on a week’s notice. A few minutes search suggests no such offers existed. Sounds like this claim of yours has as much legitimacy as your claim about Suslenkov above. But we know who was offered the shot, 40 something Joyce who just quit against the same Suslenkov. And Suslenkov is only ranked by WBA, meaning he’s paying them and just fought on the undercard of the WBA champ. Why on earth would he not want it? He has a lot to do with it as a fellow paper titlist. He was a crackhead who became a titlist by accident and sold it to the highest bidder without putting up an açtılar fight and treated by the fans accordingly. Truth, something that seems to be ducking you like the pleague when it comes to every HW in the world other than Itauma. And yes, Suslenkov is as ordinary as they come. Still much better than Kadiru. The thought of Gassiev who also looked as ordinary as they come at HW ducking him is no more far-fetched than the thought of Hrgovic who fought Zhang and Dubois ducking Gassiev and has more merit. And the Gassiev/Itauma fight will happen later this year or early next year, as suggested by both sides. What we do know is Joyce was offered it and after that, they petititioned to get Kadiru ranked so as far as we know, that’s the extent of the attempts made to replace Yoka. If you claim there was more, the onus is on you to provide proof. He legitimized himself to some by beating Stiverne, some continued to consider him a joke. He definetly got abuse far, far, far worse than Gassiev. That’s not even up for debate. And your opinion on Stiverne is just that. The fact remains that he was coming off of a top10 HW, something Pulev hasn’t done in many, many years. And if Stiverne got to where he was despite the illness, that sounds like something he should be cherished for by your logic. I don’t know about that. Stiverne lost to Demetrice King and came back from it to become a titlist. And It’s still being held against him 20 years later. Wanting to give Gassiev a free pass seems like your typical double standards. And I’m not sure how well would a 45 year old borderline top30 fit in a category of someone with a pulse. Discrimination? What on earth are you talking about? How is the guy who became a titlist in the humanly easiest way possible is being discriminated against? Kingpin of the HW division is an Eastern European, the previous true Kingpin (meaning not Joshua) was an Eastern European, 8 Eastern Europeans including Gassiev have held titles at HW in the last 20 years. 10 if you include WBA regular. So please save the “us vs them” BS to some other subject. And the praise about him losing every single one of the 2160 seconds of the fight against Usyk is too pethatic to comment. And even if It wasn’t, It still wouldn’t have anything to do with his status as a HW. Nor has he succesed enough to legitimize his place as a HW titlist. For his work at a different weight class which has nothing to do with his standing as a HW. Exclusively as a cruiserweight, certainly. And if this is how he’s being discriminated against, I can’t imagine how things would look like if he wasn’t. Would you have liked him to be crowned the new undisputed champion the second Usyk retired without even stepping in the ring? A lot of things happen in sparring. They have nothing to do with fighter’s actual accomplishments. Just like you are with Stiverne. In the end, everyone is entitled to their opinion, keyboard warrior or otherwise.
Wow...and you ought to be really looking in the mirror that you were calling for this fight. Joyce might have been killed. You judgement on the matter was very poor, really. I said I didn't want Joyce fighting. This is an assumption on your part. It has nothing to it. Ridiculous. They don't publsih everything that happens behind the scenes. Grasping at straws. Who you wanted to see, right? How does this reflect well on you? I think you are purposely choosing not to understand that they were looking for a last minute replacement. Of course guys turn down last minute offers because there is not time to do the training. Not only in none of that fair or accurate, none of it has anything to do with Gassiev. You are lecturing me on truth? -You claimed that Gassiev never beat a top 30 heavy, andthen twice admitted that Pulev WAS top 30. -You have framed this as Gassiev seeking soft touches and then admitted that Itauama served Gassiev - You called for Joyce to get the fight and now that you see that Joyce might have been killed, you are framing this as something against Murat. Dude, look in the mirror. You will say anything. Again, you are pretending that you don't understand that this was a short-notice fight. You do, and so does everyone else. But you have admitted that Itauma "swerved"him.Which you didn't have to do,because it is a matter of record. I see no paperwork yet. There is no onus on me. Various articles talked about various opponent possibilities being named. We don't know what phone calls were made. He got more **** when he fought Molina. When he beat Stiverne, he actually got some credit. Stiverne is a guy with a loss to Demetrice King. You can't move past Gassiev losing one to Wallin. Pulev is definitely better than any version of Stiverne. Lol. You will say anything. His illness has obesity as one of its precursors. He CAUSED it. No. That is not admirable. Lol, and yet you can get pst Gassiev's much more forgivable loss to Wallin. Ridiculous. He'd beat a morbidly obese guy who lost to Demetrice King, that is for sure. The fact that good east Euros and central Asians aredenied opportunities in this sport where Brits and Americans get endless opportunities. He took a path that was there for him to take, and a lot of other guys were not taking. And Usyk, despite being an Olympic gold-meddalist, had to go to everyone else's country and take the short-end money. You prove my point. Thanks. And yet it is still better than Dubois, who failed to make the distance twice, but still gets opportunity after opportunity. Not hard to understand. Because to date, no one will fight him. You say Itauama is as good as signed...let's see it. Sicne you understand that Itauma "swerved" him, ball is ingolden-boy's court. He was born smaller. Therefore started at a different weight. His overall legacy in this sport dwarfs Stiverne, Martin, and Itauma thus far combined. Which is a great accomplishment that he is builidng on. Murat is a champ by nature. Lol, again. The guys who cited as a legit top ten guy that Stiverne beat said that Murat hit him the hardest. This is not "something that happened in sparring." This is the guy YOU cited singing Murat's praises. Again, thanks for proving my points/ Yes but you have openly reversed yourself on a number of yours, while still holding out on your grand conclusion.
The Wallin loss is certainly not so forgiveable for someone with aspirations of being a top 10 heavyweight