Is Crawford vs Spence A Top 5 ATG Performance At 147?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by TNSNO1878, Jul 30, 2026 at 2:27 PM.


Where do you have it?

  1. GOAT Performance

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  2. Top 3

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  3. Top 5

    2 vote(s)
    11.8%
  4. Top 10

    1 vote(s)
    5.9%
  5. Outside Top 10

    14 vote(s)
    82.4%
  1. TNSNO1878

    TNSNO1878 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,839
    3,503
    May 5, 2025
    Originally, when it happened, I overreacted to it and said absolutely; now that the dust has settled and they've both retired, I've just about squeezed it into my top 5, but I think even then it could be too high. It's definitely top 10, I think. I've got Duran vs Leonard 1 at number 1, Leonard vs Hearns at number 2, and Armstrong against Ross at number 3, all on their own level. It doesn't touch any of those wins.

    I've got it on the same level as Hearns vs Cuevas, the first fight between Napoles and Cokes, and Leonard stopping Wilfred Benitez; I have a harder time putting these three in any clear order. In terms of pure dominance, then it could be in the top 3, considering it was for the undisputed and Spence was number 4 P4P at the time. But given that it wasn't a prime Spence and a lot of people don't seem to rate him that highly at welterweight anyway, in the grand scheme of things I'm interested in what people think.
     
    Rubber Glove Sandwich likes this.
  2. Rubber Glove Sandwich

    Rubber Glove Sandwich 'Iranian flag green' reflecting pool Full Member

    2,324
    3,294
    Aug 15, 2020
    It's a shame we don't have film of Robinson vs Gavilan 1 & 2.

    It's a good question, off the top of my head I wanna say probably not but I would have to give it some more thought.
     
    TNSNO1878 likes this.
  3. Rubber Glove Sandwich

    Rubber Glove Sandwich 'Iranian flag green' reflecting pool Full Member

    2,324
    3,294
    Aug 15, 2020
    Do you think either Pacquiao or Mayweather have a performance that's a good contender here?
     
  4. TNSNO1878

    TNSNO1878 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,839
    3,503
    May 5, 2025
    I wouldn't say so; not at 147. There's a stronger argument at other weight classes, especially 140. The Cotto win for Pacquiao is probably the best case for him at 147, but he squeezed Cotto down a couple of pounds to 145, didn't he? In terms of consistency and strength of resume, they're miles ahead of Crawford, but when it comes to one standout performance, I don't think any Floyd or Manny win cracks the top 10 at 147.
     
    Rubber Glove Sandwich likes this.
  5. META5

    META5 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,884
    3,356
    Jun 28, 2005
    Absolutely not.

    It's not on the same level as Duran dismantling Palomino or Curry's destruction of McCrory.

    SRR Vs Zivic
    Hearns Vs Cuevas
    Griffith beating Tiger - EDIT: not fought at WW
    Gavilan besting Basilio
    Pete vs McGirt I
    Benitez vs Palomino

    All of these fights are better overall performances/results, all things considered than Bud beating a shell of what Spence used to be.
     
    Last edited: Jul 30, 2026 at 4:18 PM
  6. Rubber Glove Sandwich

    Rubber Glove Sandwich 'Iranian flag green' reflecting pool Full Member

    2,324
    3,294
    Aug 15, 2020
    If we're going to be ranking performances specifically and not just the win itself, film is needed imo.

    EDIT: And Griffith vs Tiger wasn't at welterweight...
     
    TNSNO1878 likes this.
  7. META5

    META5 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,884
    3,356
    Jun 28, 2005
    Apologies - yeah, I conflated Griffith with being the welterweight champ with the fight contested at WW. D1ck of course was MW, Griffiths didn't even make 154 lbs for the fight.

    Film may be needed but even if we go with the film, there's plenty of better performances and without the film, there's much better results when context is applied.

    That Spence fight is a great win with a genuine massive asterisk against it.
     
  8. Rubber Glove Sandwich

    Rubber Glove Sandwich 'Iranian flag green' reflecting pool Full Member

    2,324
    3,294
    Aug 15, 2020
    Is Honeyghan over Curry in this discussion?
     
    TNSNO1878, Terror and META5 like this.
  9. Flash24

    Flash24 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,754
    10,124
    Oct 22, 2015
    If one knows anything about the long and rich history of welterweight boxing. It's doubtful if that fight makes the top 100 wins in the history of that division.
    A clearly diminished Spence faced the clearly overrated Crawford.
    There's nothing special about Crawford or Spence other than how poor this era of the sport has been.

    Its more of an indication of how mass media works today with every 20-40 year old "boxing expert " with a Twitter or YouTube account, and a cell phone can transmit there recentcy bias to millions worldwide, as if the sport started after they were born.
    It's like on Twitter or X, one cannot scan through without someone giving out boxing tips.
    Someone no one's ever heard of or seen before but now he's a savant boxing trainer.
    Apologies for my" old fart" rant lol....
     
    Last edited: Jul 30, 2026 at 5:02 PM
  10. TNSNO1878

    TNSNO1878 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,839
    3,503
    May 5, 2025
    Haha, that was a rant and a half. I don't want to unpack the Spence argument again, but he wasn't as diminished as a lot of people make out; he'd beat Danny Garcia and Ugas after his crash, and was ranked as the number 2 welterweight for years. Between him and Crawford, they'd beaten everyone in the top 10. It was the fight everyone wanted to see, and was the definitive fight of the 2020s, really. It was the megafight people talked about in the US for years. I can't see another one coming along and beating it.

    The Ring had Spence at number 4 pound for pound, and he was still undefeated. The betting odds were as good as even going in; the industry was completely split. I don't know anyone who picked Crawford to win in the manner he did. As a standout performance at 147, it's hard to make an argument for it being outside the top 15, I think, at most.

    Top 100 seems a bit hyperbolic; it was the first undisputed welterweight fight for 17 years and was an absolute masterclass. How could 100 welterweight fights rank above the two undefeated P4P number 3 and 4 going at it in a generation-defining fight and one completely brutalizing the other for all the belts?
     
  11. TNSNO1878

    TNSNO1878 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,839
    3,503
    May 5, 2025
    Why wouldn't you say it was on the same level as Curry vs McCrory? I was never too impressed with McCrory from an ATG standpoint; I know he was undefeated and WBC champ going in, had a great career, but Colin Jones was robbed against him twice, I think, having watched both fights back.

    Curry was a big favorite with the bookies going in as well; most writers picked a Curry stoppage, but it was still impressive that he managed it so quickly. Duran's dismantling of Palomino is one of his most underrated wins; that definitely deserves to be in the mix. I missed out Honeyghan vs Curry somehow - that's definitely in there.

    Crawford/Spence was billed as the megafight of this decade, both undefeated, pretty much even odds with the betting companies, and many in the industry were split going in. Nobody picked Crawford to win it in that manner, really, not before it anyway; quite a few people claimed they did after the fact. I think that's why it does so much heavy lifting on my list.

    I've responded above about Spence being a shell of himself, but McGirt fought Pea with a torn rotator cuff, so I'd put an asterisk next to that one as well.

    Wouldn't you have it in the top 15/20 then, I presume? What other 8/13 wins would you have above it at 147? The better case is probably somewhere between 10 and 15; I got carried away watching it live at the time, and it looks like I'm still getting carried away with it to some extent. Happy to be proved wrong on this and revise my opinion, as well; I'm just intrigued by what people think now that both have retired.
     
    Rubber Glove Sandwich likes this.
  12. META5

    META5 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,884
    3,356
    Jun 28, 2005
    McCrory was a good fighter, certainly better than the version of Spence that showed up in the ring and yes, Honeyghan Vs Curry is much better.

    Bud Vs Spence is similar to Ali Vs Williams - it tells us a lot about the man who won but that's about it. As a contest, it's not their best fight or performance relative to the context of the opponent and what the fight truly represents as a challenge of will and skill.

    There's an asterisk to the McGirt fight but the fight still is a much greater performance or holds more historical weight for a few reasons, to my mind.

    Pernell Whitaker beating McGirt remains a fundamentally superior, higher-calibre victory than Bud Crawford beating Spence Jr.
    You're not wrong about McGirt's shoulder - however, there's no equating two completely different types and degrees of physical impairment.

    The first distinction that separates the fight is the physical state of the opponents: Buddy's torn tendon Vs. Spence's systemic trauma.

    To compare these wins fairly, you have to look at the exact nature of what McGirt and Spence were dealing with when they stepped into the ring.

    Buddy McGirt’s Shoulder
    Buddy McGirt did enter the ring against Pete with a damaged left shoulder - a torn rotator cuff that effectively negated his ability to snap his elite left jab and hook.

    However, McGirt was the lineal Welterweight Champion, carrying a multi-fight win streak, and was widely considered a top-5 pound-for-pound fighter in the world. Crucially, McGirt’s physical issue was localised to a single joint. His cognitive timing, footwork, spatial awareness, stamina, and chin were completely intact. In fact, McGirt fought a masterclass with essentially one arm, throwing a significant number of punches, landing sharp right-hand counters, and keeping the fight competitive over 12 high-level rounds.

    Errol Spence Jr.’s Shell Status
    Spence’s physical deterioration by July 2023 was not a localised joint injury; it was systemic, neurological, and structural wear.
    Spence survived a horrific, high-speed Ferrari rollover crash that required facial reconstruction, followed by eye surgery for a torn retina. By the time he fought Crawford, Spence had competed just once in 2 years and was making a grueling weight cut down to 147 lbs.

    When the bell rang, Spence didn't look like a guy with a bad shoulder adjusting his strategy; he looked like a drained shell whose central nervous system could no longer process high-speed incoming visual data. His reaction time was completely shot, his balance was compromised from the first jab Crawford landed, and his legs had zero grounding, lacking the natural bounce that comes with being in good fighting shape. Crawford executed a flawless beating, but he was dismantling a fighter whose elite athletic window had been closed by trauma and inactivity.

    P4P standings and divisional dominance:

    When Pete fought McGirt, both men were at the absolute top of the sport. Whitaker was moving up to 147 lbs to challenge the reigning, undisputed king of the division.

    Whitaker vs. McGirt I: A confrontation between two active, prime Hall-of-Fame technicians operating at the absolute peak of their analytical powers. Whitaker winning that fight sealed his status as the #1 p4p fighter on the planet.

    Crawford vs. Spence: A long-delayed match that happened 3 to 4 years too late. Had they fought prior to Spence's crash and layoff, it would have carried similar weight as Whitaker-McGirt. By 2023, the event was massive in name alone, but the physical version of Spence that arrived in the ring was vastly inferior to the 2019 version. A fight built on the rep of the pre-crash Spence whilst serving up the shell of the post-crash Spence who was effectively a dead on arrival opponent for Bud to beat up on.

    Whilst both fights can be asterisked, the reasoning and therefore diminishing of the result isn't the same; both have context but they are essentially different levels of contest because:

    McGirt after Whitaker: Buddy underwent surgery, recovered, and went on to fight over 20 more times, remaining an elite world-class contender and fighting Sweet Pea in a competitive rematch less than 2-years later.
    Spence after Crawford: Spence was utterly destroyed, absorbed career-altering damage, and has not been able to return as an elite force since fhen.

    Ross Vs McLarnin
    SRR Vs Bell
    Armstrong Vs Zivic
    Griffith Vs Rodriguez
    Rodriguez Vs Griffith
    Napoles Vs Griffith
    Gavilan Vs Graham
    Palomino Vs Stacey

    Even with some asterisks, the relative competitiveness of the fights and the fighters in the fights rank above Bud and Spence fighting when Spence really shouldn't have been cleared to compete in hindsight.
     
    Last edited: Jul 31, 2026 at 1:09 AM
  13. George Crowcroft

    George Crowcroft He Who Saw The Deep Full Member

    27,692
    46,527
    Mar 3, 2019
    I think it could be top ten but it didn't take long for me to come up with ten I'd have higher.

    Hearns vs Cuevas
    Duran vs Palomino
    Duran vs Leonard
    Leonard vs Hearns
    Leonard vs Benitez
    Napoles vs Cokes
    Rodriguez vs Thompson
    Gavilan vs Turner
    Griffith vs Ortega II
    Armstrong vs Ross
     
  14. ETM

    ETM I thought I did enough to win. Full Member

    13,678
    12,343
    Mar 19, 2012
    I don't think Spence was a shell of himself so much as he was just overrated to begin with. His fanbase saw things in him that just wasn't there. Errol was good solid welterweight but he wasn't special.
    Terance Crawford in my view was the real deal. He could do everything in there box, slug, fight inside, switch stances, he had a killer instinct. He was dedicated to the game.
    In a sense the fact that narrative is being pushed that Spence was a shot fighter is a testament to how good Crawford was in there.
    To keep perspective on it though is important if you have a grasp of boxing history. It was a great win for this modern era at least as good as any win Mayweather had.
    I judge Crawford as one of the alltime greats because he was dominant, he was blatantly ducked throughout his career and he had supreme ability. He was a throwback imo.
    I don't have him in the alltime top 10 or the GOAT. That is nonsense. A great fighter though certainly.
     
  15. ETM

    ETM I thought I did enough to win. Full Member

    13,678
    12,343
    Mar 19, 2012
    One of the better wins in welterweight history that probably get overlooked was Felix Trinidad's explosive knock out of Yori Boy Campos. At the time both were undefeated, Campos was 56-0 with 51 knockouts.
    Slugger/pressure fighter vs slugger boxer. Short explosive bout with Trinidad climbing off the canvas to spin Yori Boy's head around like the exorcist practically.
    While his win over Blocker was impressive this one was against stiffer opposition. People knew Trinidad was the goods following this bout.