Which Heavyweight Is Possibly Overrated Because Of Nostalgia?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Fergy, Aug 8, 2026.


  1. slash

    slash Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,022
    4,005
    Apr 15, 2012
  2. ThatOne

    ThatOne Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,836
    9,385
    Jan 13, 2022
    The criteria for who won a round and consequently who won enough rounds to win a fight is ring generalship, clean punching, effective aggression, and defense. It's not who was worse for the wear.
     
  3. Cojimar 1946

    Cojimar 1946 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,649
    2,291
    Nov 23, 2014
    I'm counting 17 heavier guys for Louis and a number of them were top 10 ranked.
    Carnera, Baer, Nova, Godoy, Galento, Simon, and Buddy Baer were all top 10 ranked compared to only Williams for Liston so that's a pretty big difference (7 vs 1). Maybe you could throw out Galento since he was fat.

    Moreover I don't see any Liston victims being top 10 heavyweights today. They are simply too small or too chinny.

    Who did Liston beat who would make it into the top 10 the last few years? Floyd would be going up against massive punchers 60, 70 pounds heavier.
     
  4. Cojimar 1946

    Cojimar 1946 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,649
    2,291
    Nov 23, 2014
    Johansson did come close though when he stopped him early in fight one and dropped him twice in round one of fight 3.
    And it's a lot easier to avoid early kayo losses if you don't fight punchers.

    If Patterson fought Marciano or Foreman (odd to think his era overlapped with both of them) or even Williams I would be very interested to see how he handled their power in contrast to Liston.
     
    MaccaveliMacc likes this.
  5. Andre2000

    Andre2000 Active Member Full Member

    921
    1,391
    Jun 26, 2026
    Well, Ingo didn’t really come close. Floyd simply kept getting back up after numerous KDs despite his dazed state and increasing vulnerability.

    For Floyd’s proven durability, prior KDs notwithstanding, I would look more to his post Liston fights against good hitters.

    Being KD’d is one thing, but being KO’d outright is a somewhat different thing again.

    Rocky was past it as at the Moore fight at the least but Patterson vs Williams would’ve been a very interesting fight.

    People can try and reason why Floyd was never obligated to fight Williams but that doesn’t mean that Floyd might not have engaged an irrefurably eligible Big Cat at any rate. Floyd did avoid his #1 and #2 after all.

    It’s funny/ironic that some people will demand an air right case and nothing less for eligibility whilst accepting, at the same, obviously ineligible (or much less eligible) fighters having been accommodated a title shot.
     
    723 likes this.
  6. 723

    723 Delusional Old-Head + New Boxing Fan (on a hiatus) Full Member

    177
    276
    Mar 16, 2026
    Good points, especially on Patterson's somewhat lacklustre title reign. Ultimately, Cus D'Amato was too protective over Floyd Patterson. Hence, why Patterson chose to separate from him in order to finally fight Liston (even though Patterson himself knew he stood no choice).
     
    Andre2000 likes this.
  7. 723

    723 Delusional Old-Head + New Boxing Fan (on a hiatus) Full Member

    177
    276
    Mar 16, 2026
    Correct. Otherwise, Ali would've won the Fight of the Century, since he wasn't as damaged post-fight as Frazier.
     
    ThatOne and Andre2000 like this.
  8. Andre2000

    Andre2000 Active Member Full Member

    921
    1,391
    Jun 26, 2026
    I find the categories of ring generalship and defence a little bit strange.

    They are simply means to a material, and far more easily score-able ends - that being who’s landing what, how often and the degree of interpreted damage.

    Also, why is there so called “effective aggression”?

    You’re certainly not going to factor “ineffective aggression” and you can still obviously be effective without it being driven by or contained within a necessarily aggressive approach.

    Remember the days when they used to say that any individual’s scoring of a fight would heavily depend on their subjective leaning to either the aggressive style or the style of the boxer?

    Imo, that was hardly calling for the application of uniform scoring criteria. Lol.
     
    Bokaj, Greg Price99 and 723 like this.
  9. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member

    98,721
    30,668
    Jun 2, 2006
    You want to count Nova. what was the difference? A quarter of a pound.
    Where do you see the following?
    Kracken 175lbs
    Davies 186lbs
    Udell 173lbs
    Kranz187lbs
    Everett183lbs
    Delaney 180lbs
    Bivins 180lbs
    Conn 182lbs
    Conn174lbs
    Burman188lbs
    McCoy 1803/4lbs
    Pastor 183 lbs
    Pastor 179 lbs
    Ettore 189 3/4lbs
    Birkie189 1/4lbs
    Perroni 187lbs
    Massera181lbs
    Wiater185lbs
    Sykes 181lbs
    Ramage 183 1/2lbs
    LOL
     
    Last edited: Aug 31, 2026
  10. 723

    723 Delusional Old-Head + New Boxing Fan (on a hiatus) Full Member

    177
    276
    Mar 16, 2026
    Fair enough, scoring in boxing is a bit of an oddity. Hence, why there are so many controversial decisions.
     
    Andre2000 likes this.
  11. roughdiamond

    roughdiamond Ridin' the rails... Full Member

    10,686
    20,832
    Jul 25, 2015
    Just a reminder for the people talking about Usyk's weight / size that he was 207lbs in ring against Hunter and 208lbs against Mchunu (both verified on broadcast) when he was already 30 years old. His 220lbs+ weight is bulked up, as Usyk himself has talked about (with the fact that he kept his stamina and work rate so high with added lean mass implying PED use imo, but that's another discussion entirely).

    My opinion is that Usyk's 'natural' HW weight is 210 - 215lbs.
     
    Greg Price99 and Andre2000 like this.
  12. Cojimar 1946

    Cojimar 1946 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,649
    2,291
    Nov 23, 2014
    He could have fought Marciano in 1955. I would rate him a better challenger than Cockell for example.

    Nobody is saying he was obligated to fight Williams simply that it would have been a good test against a big puncher. There were always other guys more highly ranked.

    Marciano (1955)
    Satterfield (1955-56)
    Williams (1957-64)
    Foreman (1970-72)
    Shavers (71-72)

    All were punchers he could have tested his chin against
     
  13. Andre2000

    Andre2000 Active Member Full Member

    921
    1,391
    Jun 26, 2026
    I wasn’t saying that Patterson was technically obligated to face Williams - the fact that he wasn’t was my point.

    However, I believe Williams would’ve been a fighter that Patterson would’ve been steered away from at any rate.

    Cleve was also a guy that other contenders rated above him wouldn’t have and didn’t face.

    At any rate, the ratings in and around that time were somewhat questionable as to reflecting the true worth of several fighters in the top 10.

    Williams is part of the mosaic of name, reputable fighters who Patterson should’ve faced (Machen and Folley) and might’ve faced (Williams).

    Not one of those fighters appears on Floyd’s title resume and Patterson did keep Liston on the back burner for as long as possible also.

    Floyd literally couldn’t stall Liston any longer without appearing irrefutably afraid of Sonny.

    Floyd’s rep. was well and truly on the line so he simply had to face Liston when he did agree to fight him.
     
    Greg Price99 likes this.
  14. Jamal Perkins

    Jamal Perkins Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,782
    3,237
    Oct 19, 2012
    It goes over
    Lewis's head that a 35 year old considered declining for 12 years does not become a prime victory just because you were older than him when you beat him.

    Tyson was shot after Ruddock. Lewis at 35 was better than he had been at 25.