Chavez vs. Taylor 1 Fair call. Taylor won a gold medal. He had experience. Every fighter knows who has been boxing a long time as Taylor has, when you get knocked down you get up, stabilize your balance, put your hands up, look the referee in the eye and tell him (or her) you’re OK or good or fine or something. But when you don’t do those things and the referee twice asks you if you are OK, and you don’t respond, can’t complain when the fight gets stopped. I also recall that in the interview, Taylor claimed he put his hands up and told the referee he was OK, but the replay contradicted that claim. Also, you can’t say Richard Steele wasn’t consistent. He always erred on the side of safety. The same folks who criticize him, had he allowed the fight to go on and Chavez landed one more punch and Taylor died, all those same people would be the first to criticize that the referee should have stopped it. The referee is a not a timekeeper. Referees are not instructed to let the fight go on if the guy is completely concussed and not answering your questions but there’s less than 10 seconds left. You stop it when it’s time to be stopped. Had Taylor died, people would be asking Steele why did you allow it to go continue when you asked him if he was OK and he didn’t respond? Not a controversial stop at all. The referee acted as trained and instructed in modern refereeing technique. Mike Tyson vs. Carl Williams Same thing. Carl Williams got dropped. He got up relatively quickly and leaned on the ropes. He did not stabilize his balance of his own accord. When the referee, Randy Neumann, asked him if he was OK, there wasn’t a response at all other than making a strange face or grimace, slightly closing his eye briefly and raising his eyebrows, more indicative of a no than a yes. As soon as the referee stopped it, then the fighter complained and vociferously said he was OK. But that was too late. If he really wanted to continue, the time to convince the referee was before he stopped it not after. In summation, leaning against the ropes, not putting his hands up, not looking at the referee and saying I’m OK. Proper stoppage. Television often likes to stir up controversy because it makes for good copy and discussion, but they aren’t always objective, neutral, and dispassionate. Also, what we would like to see as fans isn’t always what is supposed to happen according to the rules and instructions.
Lennox Lewis - Oliver McCall. Lewis was dropped hard but tried to get up as quickly as he could. So he lost his legs for a moment and for the referee it was a green light to stop the fight. Had Lewis stayed on the ground a bit longer, he could've been in better condition when the referee checked him.
Yeah, never a good sign when you get up and you wobble and fall forward into the referee. That was one of those technical knockouts where the fighter’s head is perfectly clear, but his legs are not good. Good point. Lewis probably should’ve remained down for eight seconds before getting up. Always good to let the circuits reset a bit before rising.
I was debating about this recently and i totally agree with you. Lewis got up too quickly and his brains were still scrambled he couldn't walk in a straight line and needed the referee to steady himself. Good stoppage IMO aswell.
Hard to believe that some people believed (and perhaps still do?) that the stoppage in the Ali-Lyle fight was premature and therefore controversial. Ali’s initial right hand had Ronnie already 7-8 parts out of 10 gone and there was something like 20 or so unanswered punches landed on a teetering Ron thereafter - and I think a particularly nasty left hook that snapped Lyle’s head back was the last of those punches. Lyle protested the stoppage but fighters often do same reflexively even if out on their feet only several seconds prior. Nothing wrong with that stoppage whatsoever.
A recent one for me Wardley vs Parker I didn't find that controversial IMO. Parker got badly hurt at the end of the 10th round and hadnt recovered going into the 11th round. Wardley hurt him again in the 11th round with a right hand and then went on a 40 second onslaught without Parker landing a single punch back. Loads of people were upset about this stoppage which baffled me quite honestly.
Lennox Lewis vs Vitali Klitschko Vitali had no business continuing looking at the state his face was in.
Not being overly defensive of Usyk but I think the ref had good cause to stop the fight after Verhoeven arose from the KD. He held onto the ropes throughout the ref’s mandatory 8 count and failed to respond to the ref’s first command to come forward. When the ref led him to have his mouthpiece replaced (which Rico spat out), Rico could barely hold his feet walking to the other side of the ring. The ref had his back to Verhoeven and didn’t see this but he did see Rico unable to accomodate the simple replacing of his mouth on first attempt. Even with a whopping 31 secs from KD to the fight being waved back on, Verhoeven still couldn’t defend himself properly. So, all in all, I would say a fair stoppage. If the argument is that the round ended before the ref called it - I would say it should’ve been stopped after the KD and that Rico shouldn’t have been afforded so much time before Usyk could get back at him.