1990-91 George Foreman vs these 1930s heavyweights

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by InMemoryofJakeLamotta, Sep 11, 2026 at 6:01 PM.


  1. InMemoryofJakeLamotta

    InMemoryofJakeLamotta I have defeated the great Seamus Full Member

    17,523
    12,936
    Sep 21, 2017
    Foreman vs
    Max Baer
    Max Schmeling
    Primo Carnera
    Jack Sharkey
    Tommy Loughran
    King Levinsky
    Jim Braddock

    Does Foreman clear the field?
     
  2. ThatOne

    ThatOne Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,765
    9,272
    Jan 13, 2022
    In the same evening.
     
  3. Melankomas

    Melankomas Corbett beats your favourite fighter

    8,342
    10,122
    Dec 18, 2022
    Loughran beats him, Sharkey might but I wouldn’t bet on him not doing something stupid to end up getting starched
     
    InMemoryofJakeLamotta likes this.
  4. InMemoryofJakeLamotta

    InMemoryofJakeLamotta I have defeated the great Seamus Full Member

    17,523
    12,936
    Sep 21, 2017
    Stop being facetious
     
  5. ikrasevic

    ikrasevic War for Souls Full Member

    9,237
    9,672
    Nov 3, 2021
  6. InMemoryofJakeLamotta

    InMemoryofJakeLamotta I have defeated the great Seamus Full Member

    17,523
    12,936
    Sep 21, 2017
    Max Baer could match his strength and power and Foreman was there to be hit. And Carnera could match his jab and strength
     
  7. ikrasevic

    ikrasevic War for Souls Full Member

    9,237
    9,672
    Nov 3, 2021
    I’d give a better chance that Braddock will perform like Jimmy Young, than that Baer will perform like Ron Lyle (and Lyle lost to Foreman).
    Foreman clear the field
     
  8. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    52,256
    27,795
    Jan 3, 2007
    An early 1990’s George Foreman would have a very good shot at beating all of those men yes. Ironically, Jim Braddock and Tommy Loughran might have had the right blend of durability and boxing style to give him the most trouble. That doesn’t mean I’d favor them though
     
  9. brb

    brb Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,754
    616
    Sep 14, 2010
    This is a tough one for me. I think boxing evolved a lot in the almost 60 years. Foreman was not at his best either, tho.

    I'd go with George because he was a decent bit bigger than these guys with a good chin and reasonably good boxing skills. Typically, I wouldn't think someone could go through a list of champions like this without being truly special.