Joe Calzaghe Vs. Roy Jones Junior @168

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by ikrasevic, Sep 10, 2026.


Who wins?

This poll will close on Sep 10, 2036 at 10:51 PM.
  1. Joe Calzaghe

  2. Roy Jones Junior

Results are only viewable after voting.
  1. Tin_Ribs

    Tin_Ribs Me Full Member

    4,482
    4,201
    Jun 28, 2009
    Obviously it's specious and dishonest and centred on just picking a fighter you like to win, using their actual fight as some sort of factual gotcha.

    I do tend though to be careful to a point against over fixating on Calzaghe being flat and uninspiring against some of the cannon fodder types like Salem, Thornberry, Starie etc. Injury, lack of motivation, personal problems and a tendency to fight down to his opponents level were the main cause of performances like that imo. When something serious was on the line, he tended to step up to the plate and look sharp more often than not. Eubank, Lacy, Kessler, Brewer etc, even the second half of the Hopkins fight however f*ck ugly and offensively hideous it was.
     
  2. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    42,174
    11,561
    Mar 7, 2012
    Did you see the Mitchell fight?

    How awful his technique was, and how open he was?

    Very scrappy and very sloppy, until he caught him.

    A better fighter than Mitchell would have dropped him/knocked him out, had he have had those opportunities.
     
    Last edited: Sep 11, 2026
  3. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    66,965
    88,015
    Aug 21, 2012
    :lol: this thread is flypaper for butthurt roidstans
     
  4. ikrasevic

    ikrasevic War for Souls Full Member

    9,385
    9,840
    Nov 3, 2021
    You mean HolyROID Jones?
    I still think that everyone in the top 10 HW is on steroids, except Fury; he just ate a bunch of wild boar meat :D
     
    Mark Dunham likes this.
  5. Sangria

    Sangria You bleed like Mylee Full Member

    9,166
    4,139
    Nov 13, 2010
    RJJ turns Joe average at 168.
     
  6. Tin_Ribs

    Tin_Ribs Me Full Member

    4,482
    4,201
    Jun 28, 2009
    Was at the fight mate, fun times. Been many years since I'd seen it tbh but I've just been back and rewatched it. I'd forgotten a bit what a brilliant if wild scrap it was.

    Calzaghe largely beat the snot out of him though other than the knockdown I thought. He was mostly sharp and focused by his standards in the first round, lasered in and imposed himself rather spitefully on Mitchell from the off. The odd risky flail and opening up of himself up trying to get off at close range moving from a dipping position to square on and upright (partly how he ended up in his arse in the 2nd) He just about dodged a right hand counter at one point that would have really hurt him if it had landed flush. He did show though what a fine, spiteful and precise infighter he could be when going about it properly and really rinsed Mitchell to the body.

    Mitchell looked overwhelmed and wobbly and the end of the first and I thought that was when Calzaghe became more reckless and overconfident in the 2nd and didn't show Mitchell the respect he deserved as a very big puncher, which got him sat on his arse. A very hard compact punch that he should have seen coming but didn't. He recovered quickly though and didn't look phased, his chin and powers of recovery were excellent.

    He WAS wild in the follow up and dug in like a lion winging away square on with his chin up that could have been disastrous but ended up rapidly paying off as it turned out.

    It might be true that a better fighter could have finished him off but it's speculation really. I tend to think that someone would have done it to him at some point in his career if it was something waiting to inevitably occur.
     
  7. Tin_Ribs

    Tin_Ribs Me Full Member

    4,482
    4,201
    Jun 28, 2009
    Also, there was a lovely little nod of acknowledgement to Howard Winstone from Ian Darke just before the opening bell that I appreciated.

    I've sort of made my peace with Calzaghe and have a quiet confidence of my view of him formed over the years (simply put that I rate him lower than the British boxing establishment does but higher than some fans). All relative to the big historical picture I hope. It's not wrong imo to say that he could beat, say, Ward, Toney, Bivol or Kovalev on a given night, but running a gauntlet in the 70s could easily lose to a Scott, Jesse Burnett, Richie Kates type or be in a struggle a bit with a Chris Finnegan while beating someone like Lonnie Bennett or Len Hutchins.

    His opposition was sometimes Golovkin/Ricardo Lopez/Khaosai Galaxy level of horrific in an all-time sense, and he didn't always routinely crush them in the way that the other three did (though not for lack of ability imo). He was sloppy and unorthodox sometimes but still truly excellent at his best and a natural fighter.
     
  8. Bummy Davis

    Bummy Davis Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,804
    2,406
    Aug 26, 2004
    Joe lived in 168 like Hagler and Monzon lived in 160 - Jones was obviously a great fighter, but a prime Joe would be a tough fight because of his speed and movement.
    Could go either way - game plan and ability to change up but far from an easy fight for either man at 168 primes.
     
    ikrasevic likes this.
  9. ikrasevic

    ikrasevic War for Souls Full Member

    9,385
    9,840
    Nov 3, 2021
    This is the answer I like the most so far, and it seems the most realistic to me... but I'm biased :)
     
  10. KO_King

    KO_King Horizontal Heavyweight Full Member

    948
    2,036
    Apr 16, 2023
    Jones, without hesitation.
     
  11. THE BLADE 2

    THE BLADE 2 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,932
    4,694
    Jul 14, 2009
    Jones was on another level at 168. Untouchable. In his prime barely lost a round against world class opposition. Dazzling speed and reflexes.
     
    Hotep Kemba and ikrasevic like this.