Max Kellerman: "I have yet to see a fight in which i thought marquez was beaten"

I think the first Pac fight is the only fight he really lost.

He's been in some other close ones though.

I had him beating John and Barrera by a couple points respectively and had his fight with Norwood and the rematch with Pac scored even.

 

It's not me who's missing the point . . . did I mention anything about JMM staying on his feet?

That sarcasm are for the posters who's gonna argue about JMM being higher in the p4p ratings because according to your thread he seems to have won all his fights . . . I'm just beating them into it. :deal

 

I would use someone who's opinion is more credible than Max Kellerman.

He is the same guy that said Glass Jaw Roy Jones would beat Joe Frazier. atsch:rofl

 

10-20 years from now I think he will not be rated highly as Barrera and Morales. Put if he can beat Casa, then beat Pac. Then it might be different. I just wish he could have got a chance against Hamed and Morales. But Hamed people didn't want the fight to happen. I not sure on this but Morales and Marquez were both Top Rank fighters. Morales was Arum money man and draw. Was he afraid to put Morales in their against Marquez? i REALLY WISHED THAT FIGHT HAD HAPPENED. A fight like those two would had helped his legacy bigtime

 

Marquez is one of the most technically skilled fighter in the modern era of the sports . . . no matter how controversial . . . he drew 1 and lost 1 close fights against Pacquaio . . . so if he wins against Casa . . . he'll be asured of being high in recognition in history for being a 3 divisional champ himself.

 

Assuming he would have won them fights it would have helped his legacy, which is a pretty big assumption. I wouldn't be surprised if both beat him.

 

I also believe that jmm has not been beaten yet. on the other hand i also believe there are some fights where he did not beat his opponent. i think jmm made it to the top of the heap in the 130 division but was forced to share it with pac because neither one could knock the other off. the judges scoring and the opinions of biased fans does not change what i saw and how i think a fighter establishes superiority over an opponent.

 

Irrelevant? Do you know the verbal diarrhea that Kellerman spews? The guy is a hack and a clown.

 

How am I narrow minded?....If I came off blunt in my first post it's because I see where a thread like this is going, it's going to end up with a bunch JMM fans claiming robbery in both fights, and if/when JMM fans enter this thread and do claim robbery on both fights I highly doubt that you would call them narrow minded for saying that.

 

exactly to bad they never happened. But I won't count Marquez out against anyone at 120-130 in the era he fought in. Maybe a fight with Kelly could have also helped and a junior jones. But Morales was a bad boy and Hamed hit way to hard and the way Marquez all ways gets kd, I don't think he could take an Hamed punch. I think he hits harder than Pac.