interesting......... 1 point: the walcott I fight had a rematch clause automatically that if marciano were to win, walcott would get a rematch. he had no choice. interesting..... 1 point: do you think rocky proved his ability to deal with bigger world class guy in his destruction of joe louis? who was similiar size and style of baker/valdez 2nd point: great matchup rocky vs harold, too bad harold had his sights set on light-H crown, he was too busy chasin moore. 3rd point: nice story, hurricane jackson and rocky marciano sparred together in early 54, rocky hit hurricane with a shot to the liver, hurricane jackson realled around the ring draped over the ropes and PUKED EVERYWHERE NON STOP....a reporter who saw the thing threated to report the story in the papers if jackson ever tried to claim marciano was afraid to fight him. point 1: Bivins was like retired and shot by 55, this would be just an utter disgrace lol point 2: interesting u bringing up satterfield. another good story for you, satterfield vs Layne was the battle of fireworks, considered the two top young relentless sluggers in the division. i dont know if u seen it on film, but it was a WAR! lyle-foreman style! The story behind this fight is the winner of this fight was too fight the other top young undefeated heavyweight slugger......rocky marciano. so had satterfield beaten layne(which he almost did) he would have fought marciano in 51. would have been great for the 1 round it lasted! lol. marciano fought layne instead and brutally knocked layne out. your diagnosis of 157-1959 is very interesting.....i believe past his prime he would beat some of them in 1956 and 1957 but by 1958 he would be too far over the hill and one of the young guys would take him(though marciano would never quit) agreed. marciano and liston were the two big dogs.
ur right the public and jim norris clammored for charles who was the # 1 ring magazine rated contender and a big draw. the idea was for marciano to take on valdez in winter of 1955 where he would be a big draw in Miami with the latino crown. in fact, charles was seen as so dangerous marcianos camp chose roland lastarza to fight over ezzard in 53 because they considered ezzard the more experienced/dangerous fighter.
Well, there would be a lot more talk about him ducking the best opposition, obviously- Charles and Moore would have been major oversights for his legacy.
see thats what I think, but then again people wouldnt have the "age" or "size" critisism on rock anymore
The fighters similar in age to Marciano do not seem to have done very well overall against the aging fighters from Joe Louis's era, Walcott and Moore especially. Marciano needed to avenge all the fallen fighters of his era and resist the tyranny of the Joe Louis era which was trying to maintain dominance over the younger generation.