De la Hoya v Hopkins

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by toffeejack, Sep 9, 2008.

  1. toffeejack

    toffeejack Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2007
    Messages:
    5,064
    Likes Received:
    1
    I read quite a lot of posts on here accusing DLH of taking a dive against Hopkins with that liver shot.

    Who on here truely believes this? And if so what exactly would he have gained from it? Because there was no rematch.
     
  2. Beeston Brawler

    Beeston Brawler Comical Ali-egedly Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2008
    Messages:
    46,399
    Likes Received:
    15
    No dive IMO

    He was well in the fight - wasn't winning it really but if he had swept the latter rounds he may have scraped a dodgy SD
     
  3. catasyou

    catasyou Lucian Bute Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2008
    Messages:
    38,466
    Likes Received:
    21
    He got KOed simple as that,good liver shot always does that especially the bigger man hit him
     
  4. charlievint

    charlievint Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2004
    Messages:
    19,338
    Likes Received:
    1
    He didn't take a dive......and he was doing very well. The fight was a chess match and DLH was more than holding his own. Bhop starts late anyway so he was warming up by the 6th round and that's when the tide began to shift. As we all know DLH begins to fade later in fights. So I think it was a hard case to make that DLH was going to be Hop.
     
  5. doubleplaidinum

    doubleplaidinum Maravilla Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2008
    Messages:
    8,397
    Likes Received:
    0
    why would he take a dive?
     
  6. Beeston Brawler

    Beeston Brawler Comical Ali-egedly Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2008
    Messages:
    46,399
    Likes Received:
    15
    There was no reason to take a dive, if he had been taking a beating then I suppose fair enough, but imagine a former SFW champ becoming linear and undisputed MW champ?