Pernell Whitaker vs. Oscar De La Hoya

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by soxfan57, Oct 9, 2008.


  1. Sweet Pea

    Sweet Pea Obsessed with Boxing banned

    27,199
    93
    Dec 26, 2007
    You've clearly stated that you can't actually understand how anyone would give either opponent the win. I've given my reasons for considering it a clear Whitaker win. If you choose to score that way, that's your criteria, though I personally don't give much credit to 10 punch combinations that hit nothing but air.:good
     
  2. Executioner

    Executioner Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,587
    8
    Apr 22, 2006
  3. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion Full Member

    123,070
    35,188
    Jun 23, 2005
  4. EL-MATADOR

    EL-MATADOR Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,760
    2
    Sep 25, 2008
    sweet pea got robbed no question bout it
     
  5. EL-MATADOR

    EL-MATADOR Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,760
    2
    Sep 25, 2008
    exactly oscar's punches weren't effective
     
  6. Sweet Pea Pacquiao

    Sweet Pea Pacquiao Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,294
    0
    Aug 25, 2004
    Does anyone have the animated GIF where Oscar threw a 10 punch combo and none landed?
     
  7. soxfan57

    soxfan57 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,597
    2
    Jun 28, 2008
    Oscar's punches weren't effective? I didn't see more than 5 punches from whitaker that had any effect on oscar...Oscar landed 20+ big shots.
     
  8. the cobra

    the cobra Awesomeizationism! Full Member

    12,028
    106
    Jun 30, 2008
    Whitaker by two points. Close fight, and Oscar did land the harder shots, but they were few and far between and he never really hurt Pea, which isn't enough to overcome Pernell throwing more, landing more, higher connect percentage. He was in control for most of the fight IMO.
     
  9. sweet_scientist

    sweet_scientist Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,744
    88
    Nov 8, 2004
    Oscar's punches had great effect - on the crowd. :D
     
  10. Spitbucket

    Spitbucket Guest

    [yt]jS0CZRZtwaw[/yt]

    And so did Whitakers goofy antics see min 3:23!

    My impression before the fight was that the young DLH was way over his head against a defensive wizard like Pea.

    My impression after the fight, DLH deserved no worse than a tie.
    Whitaker failed to impress me as definitely being the better fighter that night!

    And for the record, primed or not, Whitaker/DLH would have always been a close fight!
     
  11. sweet_scientist

    sweet_scientist Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,744
    88
    Nov 8, 2004
    So after Whitaker struggled with Diosbelys Hurtado and Wilfredo Rivera you thought that DLH was going to be way over his head? Did you not follow boxing at the time? DLH was a 3-1 favourite going into the fight.

    And no, DLH-Whitaker would not have been a close fight in Whitaker's prime, especially at 135.
     
  12. viperguy

    viperguy Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,627
    0
    Jan 21, 2005
    Oscar won that fight with Whitaker but I totally disagreed with the judges score cards. Thay had Oscar up by so many points which was ridiculous.
     
  13. Spitbucket

    Spitbucket Guest

    Call me crazy but a young DLH going into uncharted territory(147) where Pea had reigned for quite a while did give me some doubts.

    But don't tell me, you must be one of the few who had a crystal ball and knew exactly what was going to happen!

    And Yes, even at 135, DLH/Whitaker would have been a close fight, don't let Whitaker's victory over Azumah Nelson fool you!:deal
     
  14. Sweet Pea

    Sweet Pea Obsessed with Boxing banned

    27,199
    93
    Dec 26, 2007
    Oscar would've been schooled at 135. Too green against a prime Pea does not bode well for someone who arguably lost to a past prime Pea during his own prime.
     
  15. sweet_scientist

    sweet_scientist Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,744
    88
    Nov 8, 2004
    There was no crystal ball needed to know that Whitaker had looked like **** in the last 18 months and that DLH was slicing through opponents like they were nothing.

    Moving up to 147 wasn't really an issue because Whitaker was about as small a welterweight as you could get, and as you saw in the fight, DLH actually looked more like a welterweight than what Whitaker did.

    Thinking DLH was going to be in over his head wasn't a realistic expectation. You might have thought that, but nothing really points to it as far as I'm concerned.