And I shredded your points to pieces. Since then you've done nothing but make snide remarks because you have nothing to work with. If you want to be taken seriously (which you wouldn't be by anyone actually reading this debate right now) at least attempt to rebut my points, or else concede and stop trying to convince yourself that you know what you're talking about, because you're clearly out of your league here.
I said he arguably won the fight, which is backed by the poll and every poll that has ever been done on this topic. Is that really so hard to have originally comprehended?
Yeah, I really, really want to be treated seriously by an internet "knowitall" who goes through life with his head up Sweetpea's ass! Oooh please sign me up! Get a life:hi:
You've proven your worth (of lack thereof) as a serious poster. Can't even engage in a debate you started with anything outside of insults, nor can you simply admit you were wrong when it's as clear as day to everyone that you were. I'd guess you were no older than 13-14. Truly, truly pathetic.
Just wanted to fully understand how you meant "Whitaker beat DLH". And sorry, I'm Greek and don't get all the slang ....wind-up???
Lets stick to the actual facts, and I'm not getting on you or any other posters. There is no fight that can describe how another fight went or was judged.
Funny how you get in the lawyer suit whenever Floyd's name is mentioned Ok, ok JOKING! Don't start defending Mayweather now ffs!!!
Wrong about what.:huh Wrong about thinking DLH edged out the fight. Wrong for insisting that DLH was not yet primed at 24. Wrong for saying that DLH/Whitaker would have still been close had they both been in their primes. All you do is disagree with my points and assume that you're right. I stand by my earlier post, You are a douche! Go ahead and disprove that................good luck:deal