DLH vs Whitaker wasn't a robbery at all, I have said on another thread that I felt DLH won close but clear. Hatton vs Collazo is a decent fight, many people felt it was a stinker but it had me on the edge of my seat at times - especially in the first two and last two rounds.
Agree with you 100% that it wasn't a robbery...Oscar won a close but clear decision. However, people are split 50/50 on who won that fight so that certainly makes it a controversial decision.
Morales/Barrera II This was a bad decision, even worse when you watch with the sound turned down as the commentators like Barrera a little better & can sway you in close rds. Ps. Who were your winners for the above fights ?
De La Hoya-Mosley I: Mosley De La Hoya-Trinidad: De La Hoya De La Hoya-Whitaker: De La Hoya Pacquiao-Marquez II: Marquez Leonard-Hagler: Hagler Johnson-Dawson: Dawson Mosley clearly won a close fight vs DLH. De La Hoya clearly won vs Trinidad...Robbery: Only 2 rounds Trinidad won CLEARLY. DLH clearly won a close fight vs whitaker from my perspective. I had marquez beating pacquiao. However, I could see someone having pacquiao winning the fight and would have no qualms about it. Hagler was downright robbed. Leonard only won like 2 rounds clearly...Even though Hagler looked as bad as ever, he was better than SRL that night. I had dawson winning a close decision.
I actually thought the decision was fair. Murphy spent too much time being defensive and not doing enough offense of his own. MAGO threw a lot of back punches, although not all were his fault since Murphy turned his body when they came at him.
I think anything worse than a Draw for DLH-Trinidad is just a bad scorecard. Felix only won 2 rounds clearly